Show simple item record

The X-ray luminosity-mass relation for local clusters of galaxies

dc.contributor.authorStanek, R. M. (Rebecca M.)en_US
dc.contributor.authorEvrard, August E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBohringer, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchuecker, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNord, Brian D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-14T19:11:07Z
dc.date.available2008-08-14T19:11:07Z
dc.date.issued2006-09-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationStanek, R; Evrard, AE; Bohringer, H; Schuecker, P; Nord, B. (2006). Astrophysical Journal, 648:(2, Part1) 956-968. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60592>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-637Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602324en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60592
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the relationship between soft X-ray luminosity and mass for low-redshift clusters of galaxies by comparing observed number counts and scaling laws to halo-based expectations of Lambda CDM cosmologies. We model the conditional likelihood of halo luminosity as a lognormal distribution of fixed width, centered on a scaling relation, L proportional to M-p rho(s)(c) (z), and consider two values for s, appropriate for self-similar evolution or no evolution. Convolving with the halo mass function, we compute expected counts in redshift and flux that, after appropriate survey effects are included, we compare to REFLEX survey data. Counts alone provide only an upper limit on the scatter in mass at fixed luminosity, sigma(ln M) < 0.4. We argue that the observed, intrinsic variance in the temperature-luminosity relation is directly indicative of mass-luminosity variance and derive sigma(ln M) = 0.43 +/- 0.06 from HIFLUGCS data. When added to the likelihood analysis, we derive values p = 1.59 +/- 0.05, ln L-15,L-0 1.34 +/- 0.09, and sigma(ln M) = 0.37 +/- 0.05 for self-similar redshift evolution in a concordance (Omega(m) = 0.3, Omega(Lambda) = 0.7, sigma(8) = 0.9) universe. The present-epoch intercept is sensitive to power spectrum normalization, L-15,L-0 proportional to sigma(-4)(8), and the slope is weakly sensitive to the matter density, p proportional to Omega(1/2)(m). We find a substantially ( factor 2) dimmer intercept and slightly steeper slope than the values published using hydrostatic mass estimates of the HIFLUGCS sample and show that a Malmquist bias of the X-ray flux-limited sample accounts for this effect. In light of new WMAP constraints, we discuss the interplay between parameters and sources of systematic error and offer a compromise model with Omega(m) = 0.24, sigma(8) = 0.85, and somewhat lower scatter sigma(ln M) =0.25, in which hydrostatic mass estimates remain accurate to similar to 15%. We stress the need for independent calibration of the L-M relation via weak gravitational lensing.en_US
dc.format.extent450746 bytes
dc.format.extent18 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherUniv Chicago Pressen_US
dc.subjectGalaxies : Clusters : Generalen_US
dc.subjectIntergalactic Mediumen_US
dc.subjectX-rays : Galaxies : Clustersen_US
dc.titleThe X-ray luminosity-mass relation for local clusters of galaxiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniv Michigan, Dept Astron, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Ctr Theoret Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniv Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMax Planck Inst Extraterr Phys, D-85740 Garching, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60592/1/Stanek2006X-Ray.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/506248en_US
dc.owningcollnameAstrophysics (Physics, Department of)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.