Show simple item record

The Contribution of Galaxy Clusters to the Soft-X-Ray Background

dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWachter, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEvrard, August E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSilk, Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-14T19:11:28Z
dc.date.available2008-08-14T19:11:28Z
dc.date.issued1992-05-20en_US
dc.identifier.citationBlanchard, A; Wachter, K; Evrard, AE; Silk, J. (1992). Astrophysical Journal, 391:(1, Part1) 1-15. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60598>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-637Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60598
dc.description.abstractWe examine models for the expected contribution to the X-ray background (XRB) from clusters of galaxies in a flat universe with a spectrum of fluctuations corresponding to the standard cold dark matter picture and for a power-law spectrum P(k) is-proportional-to k(n) with n = -2. We consider a self-similar scaling model for clusters proposed by Kaiser, along with several variants. The self-similar model produces an appreciable fraction of the soft X-ray background. However, the predicted luminosity function overproduces low-luminosity clusters and expected number counts exceed observations. Incompleteness due to spatial extension of the sources is unlikely to account for these discrepancies. Photon statistics from synthesized maps of deep Einstein fields show a granularity similar to that deduced by Hamilton and Helfand from the Einstein data but overproduces by a large factor the number of discrete sources observed as clusters, and the fluctuation limit derived from the recent correlation analyses of the background. This occurs even though a large fraction of cluster sources may be missed by detection algorithms geared toward detection of point sources. Two alternative models are designed to be consistent with the local luminosity function data. For these, we generate expected deep images for the ROSAT satellite. We predict that a substantial fraction of extragalactic component of the soft (0.1-2.4 keV) XRB might be due to clusters. Clusters of galaxies should be a significant source of background at energies around 2 keV and are likely to contribute up to 30% of the unresolved component. They should produce fluctuations at a level close to present limits. These sources are extended and might easily be missed by use of a point source algorithm for detection. Furthermore, we find that the clusters' number counts as well as their contribution in the soft ROSAT energy ranges are higher in the n = -2 model than in CDM models. ROSAT observations might therefore help in differentiating between these models.en_US
dc.format.extent2565207 bytes
dc.format.extent18 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherUniv Chicago Pressen_US
dc.subjectDark Matteren_US
dc.subjectDiffuse Radiationen_US
dc.subjectGalaxies : Clusteringen_US
dc.subjectX-rays : Galaxiesen_US
dc.titleThe Contribution of Galaxy Clusters to the Soft-X-Ray Backgrounden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV PARIS 07,F-75221 PARIS 05,FRANCEen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT STAT,BERKELEY,CA 94720en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHYS,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV CALIF BERKELEY,CTR PARTICLE ASTROPHYS,BERKELEY,CA 94720en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT ASTRON,BERKELEY,CA 94720en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT PHYS,BERKELEY,CA 94720en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60598/1/1992ApJ___391____1B.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/171321en_US
dc.owningcollnameAstrophysics (Physics, Department of)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.