Show simple item record

Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results—Medicare data Findings from this article were presented at the ASCO Breast Symposium, San Francisco, California, September 7-8, 2007.

dc.contributor.authorFriese, Christopher R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNeville, Bridget A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEdge, Stephen B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHassett, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEarle, Craig C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-03T20:10:25Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T17:40:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2009-02-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationFriese, Christopher R.; Neville, Bridget A.; Edge, Stephen B.; Hassett, Michael J.; Earle, Craig C. (2009). "Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results—Medicare data Findings from this article were presented at the ASCO Breast Symposium, San Francisco, California, September 7-8, 2007. ." Cancer 115(4): 716-724. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61889>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61889
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19152430&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite known benefits to needle biopsy for suspicious breast lesions, variability in the use of this technique has been documented in practice. We sought to study the use of needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy in women with breast cancer, predictors of needle biopsy use, and the effect of biopsy choice on overall number of surgical procedures needed to treat breast cancer. METHODS: We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for 45,542 women diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 with ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I-II breast cancer. By using diagnosis and procedure codes from 3 months before to 6 months after the SEER diagnosis, we classified the initial biopsy as needle or surgical. By using multivariate logistic regression, we identified patient and tumor characteristics associated with needle biopsy use, and estimated the association between initial biopsy type and likelihood for multiple breast surgeries. RESULTS: Needle biopsy was the initial procedure for 11,073 (24.3%) women. In multivariate analyses, needle biopsy use varied significantly by race, year of diagnosis, and tumor size. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, needle biopsy use was associated with a reduced likelihood of multiple breast surgeries (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Use of needle biopsy as the initial breast cancer procedure was more common among black women and those with larger tumors, and increased significantly over time. Providers should consider needle biopsy when clinically feasible as the initial breast procedure, because it may reduce the number of surgeries needed to treat breast cancer. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent186333 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleBreast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results—Medicare data Findings from this article were presented at the ASCO Breast Symposium, San Francisco, California, September 7-8, 2007.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nursing Business and Health Systems, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 647-2417 ; AOCN, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Room 4162, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5482en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Breast Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts ; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHealth Services Research Program, Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19152430en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/61889/1/24085_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.24085en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.