Show simple item record

Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere

dc.contributor.authorOren, Ramen_US
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Kurt H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEwers, B. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMaier, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchafer, K. V. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHendrey, G. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcNulty, S. G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKatul, Gabriel G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-01T17:21:34Z
dc.date.available2009-06-01T17:21:34Z
dc.date.issued2001-05-24en_US
dc.identifier.citationOren, R; Ellsworth, DS; Johnsen, KH; Phillips, N; Ewers, BE; Maier, C; Schafer, KVR; McCarthy, H; Hendrey, G; McNulty, SG; Katul, GG. (2001) "Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere." Nature 411(6836): 469-472. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/62517>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/62517
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11373677&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractNorthern mid-latitude forests are a large terrestrial carbon sink(1-4). Ignoring nutrient limitations, large increases in carbon sequestration from carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization are expected in these forests(5). Yet, forests are usually relegated to sites of moderate to poor fertility, where tree growth is often limited by nutrient supply, in particular nitrogen(6,7). Here we present evidence that estimates of increases in carbon sequestration of forests, which is expected to partially compensate for increasing CO2 in the atmosphere, are unduly optimistic(8). In two forest experiments on maturing pines exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2, the CO2-induced biomass carbon increment without added nutrients was undetectable at a nutritionally poor site, and the stimulation at a nutritionally moderate site was transient, stabilizing at a marginal gain after three years. However, a large synergistic gain from higher CO2 and nutrients was detected with nutrients added. This gain was even larger at the poor site (threefold higher than the expected additive effect) than at the moderate site (twofold higher). Thus, fertility can restrain the response of wood carbon sequestration to increased atmospheric CO2. Assessment of future carbon sequestration should consider the limitations imposed by soil fertility, as well as interactions with nitrogen deposition.en_US
dc.format.extent307964 bytes
dc.format.extent2489 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMacmillan Publishers Ltd.en_US
dc.sourceNatureen_US
dc.titleSoil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphereen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniv Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDuke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBrookhaven Natl Lab, Dept Environm Sci, Upton, NY 11973 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUS Forest Serv, So Res Stn, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBoston Univ, Dept Geog, Boston, MA 02215 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUS Forest Serv, So Global Climate Change Program, Raleigh, NC 27606 USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11373677en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62517/1/411469a0.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35078064en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNatureen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.