Show simple item record

Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence

dc.contributor.authorTang, Tricia S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Stephanie K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoubidoux, Marilyn A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Linpingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-12T15:37:03Z
dc.date.available2010-09-01T19:24:06Zen_US
dc.date.issued2009-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationTang, Tricia S.; Patterson, Stephanie K.; Roubidoux, Marilyn A.; Duan, Linping (2009). "Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence." Psycho-Oncology 18(7): 727-734. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63566>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63566
dc.description.abstractObjectives : Although rates for first-time and recent mammography screening have increased for women in the US in the past decade, rates for repeat mammography remain low. This study aimed to conduct an analysis of women's mammography experience, to examine the rates of repeat mammography and to identify the significant predictors of repeat mammography within 12 and 18 months of the index mammogram. Methods : Participants were 397 women obtaining a screening mammogram (i.e. index) at three university-affiliated radiology clinics. Following the index mammogram, women completed the measures assessing demographic background, health history, breast cancer knowledge, risk, and screening history, and aspects of the mammography experience. Eighteen months following the index mammogram, 296 women were contacted via telephone to assess repeat mammography behavior. Results : Factor analysis of a mammography experience survey yielded four major components including satisfaction with clinic services, physical experience, psychological experience, and communication with clinic staff. Twelve-month and 18-month repeat mammography rates were 37 and 68%, respectively. Logistic regression models found lifetime number of mammograms to predict repeat mammography at 12 and 18 months. In addition, the number of clinical breast exams obtained in the past 5 years predicted repeat mammography at 12 months, while having scheduled a mammography appointment predicted repeat mammography at 18 months. Conclusions : Based on these findings, strategies to increase mammography adherence include implementing a formal reminder system that prompts patients (e.g. postcard, automated telephone call) to schedule an annual mammogram or training clinic staff to automatically schedule an annual mammogram at the time of the current screening appointment. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent149224 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleWomen's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ; Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, G1109 Towsley Center, SPC 5201 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5201, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19035468en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63566/1/1463_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.1463en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsycho-Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.