Show simple item record

Key concerns about the current state of bladder cancer

dc.contributor.authorLotan, Yairen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamat, Ashish M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Michael P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Victoria L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShore, Nealen_US
dc.contributor.authorJewett, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchelhammer, Paul F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Ralph deVereen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuale, Dianeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cheryl T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-02T16:57:57Z
dc.date.available2010-10-05T18:27:29Zen_US
dc.date.issued2009-09-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationLotan, Yair; Kamat, Ashish M.; Porter, Michael P.; Robinson, Victoria L.; Shore, Neal; Jewett, Michael; Schelhammer, Paul F.; White, Ralph deVere; Quale, Diane; Lee, Cheryl T. (2009). "Key concerns about the current state of bladder cancer." Cancer 115(18): 4096-4103. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64125>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64125
dc.description.abstractBladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and, on a per capita basis, is the most expensive cancer from diagnosis to death. Unfortunately, National Cancer Institute funding for bladder cancer is quite low when compared with other common malignancies. Limited funding has stifled research opportunities for new and established investigators, ultimately encouraging them to redirect research efforts to other organ sites. Waning interest of scientists has further fueled the cycle of modest funding for bladder cancer. One important consequence of this has been a lack of scientific advancement in the field. Patient advocates have decidedly advanced research efforts in many cancer sites. Breast, prostate, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer advocates have organized highly successful campaigns to lobby the federal government and the medical community to devote increased attention and funding to understudied malignancies and to conduct relevant studies to better understand the therapy, diagnosis, and prevention of these diseases. Bladder cancer survivors have lacked a coordinated advocacy voice until recently. A concerted effort to align bladder cancer advocates, clinicians, and urologic organizations is essential to define the greatest needs in bladder cancer and to develop related solutions. This position paper represents a collaborative discussion to define the most concerning trends and greatest needs in the field of bladder cancer as outlined by the Bladder Cancer Think Tank, the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, and the Society of Urologic Oncology. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent169329 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleKey concerns about the current state of bladder canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas ; Fax: (214) 648-8786 ; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9110en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washingtonen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGrand Strand Urology, Myrtle Beach, South Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Marylanden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19536899en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64125/1/24463_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.24463en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.