Ever Closer Union or Babylonian Discord?
dc.contributor.author | Fidrmuc, Jan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ginsburgh, Victor | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weber, Schlomo | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-17T17:03:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-17T17:03:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-07-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2007-887 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64410 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Extensive multilingualism is one of the most important and fundamental principles of the European Union. However, a large number of official languages (currently 23) hinders communication and imposes substantial financial and legal costs. We address the merits of multilingualism and formulate an analytical framework to determine the optimal number of official languages in the EU. Using the results of a 2005 Eurobarometer survey of languages in the EU 27, we first derive the sets of languages that minimize aggregate linguistic disenfranchisement of the Unionís citizens for any given number of languages. We then proceed by discussing the political-economy framework and feasibility of a potential linguistic reform in the EU under alternative voting rules. We argue that a six-language regime would be a reasonable intermediate choice: a lower number of official languages results in excessive linguistic disenfranchisement whereas adding further languages increases the costs but brings only limited benefits. We also show that even though a linguistic reform reducing the number of official languages to six is unlikely to gain sufficient support at the present, this may change in the future since young people are more proficient at speaking foreign languages. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 227597 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1802 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | wp887 | en_US |
dc.subject | Languages, Disenfranchisement, European Union, Linguistic Standardization | en_US |
dc.subject.other | D70, O52, Z13 | en_US |
dc.title | Ever Closer Union or Babylonian Discord? | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | William Davidson Institute | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64410/1/wp887.pdf | |
dc.contributor.authoremail | Jan.Fidrmuc@brunel.ac.uk | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.