The Scholarly Communication Process within the University Research Corridor (Michigan State University, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State University)
dc.contributor.author | Utter, Timothy P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Holley, Robert P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-13T19:25:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-01-13T19:25:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-10-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Resource Sharing & Information Networks, Volume 20 Issue 1, January 2009 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64857> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0737-7797 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64857 | |
dc.description | Author Posting. (c) Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2009. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of 'Copyright Holder' for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Resource Sharing & Information Networks, Volume 20 Issue 1, January 2009. doi:10.1080/07377790903018444 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07377790903018444) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The growth of open access publishing, the development of institutional repositories, and the availability of millions of digitized monographs and journals are rapidly changing scholarly communication. This case study looks at the current and possible uses of these tools by Michigan’s three largest universities: Michigan State University, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State University. The authors explore their usefulness in fostering collaboration within the University Research Corridor (URC), an alliance of the three universities, as a specific example of scholarly research collaborations. The paper also examines whether any shared use of these tools would further the related missions of the URC as well as their member universities and libraries toward the ultimate goal of helping the Michigan economy. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 213552 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.subject | Scholarly Communication | en_US |
dc.subject | Scholarly Publishing | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access | en_US |
dc.subject | Collaboration | en_US |
dc.subject | University Research Corridor | en_US |
dc.subject | Institutional Repositories | en_US |
dc.title | The Scholarly Communication Process within the University Research Corridor (Michigan State University, the University of Michigan, and Wayne State University) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Library, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Wayne State University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64857/1/Scholarly Communication Process.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/07377790903018444 | |
dc.identifier.source | Resource Sharing & Information Networks | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-4340-3083 | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Utter, Timothy; 0000-0002-4340-3083 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Library (University of Michigan Library) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.