Show simple item record

State Practice Variations in the Use of Tube Feeding for Nursing Home Residents with Severe Cognitive Impairment

dc.contributor.authorAhronheim, Judith C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMulvihill, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSieger, Carolen_US
dc.contributor.authorPark, Pilen_US
dc.contributor.authorFries, Brant E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:00:11Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:00:11Z
dc.date.issued2001-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationAhronheim, Judith C.; Mulvihill, Michael; Sieger, Carol; Park, Pil; Fries, Brant E. (2001). "State Practice Variations in the Use of Tube Feeding for Nursing Home Residents with Severe Cognitive Impairment." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 49(2): 148-152. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65463>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65463
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11207868&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo describe the differences in prevalence of tube feeding among states and to examine possible factors that could explain practice patterns. DESIGN: Analysis of random samples from an interstate data bank comprised of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized, federally mandated assessment instrument for nursing home residents. SETTING: Nursing homes in four states participating in a federal demonstration project of case mix payment plus five others with existing MDS data systems. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 65 years of age and older (N = 57,029), who had very severe cognitive impairment, including total dependence in eating, and who resided in nursing homes during 1994, the most recent year for which uniform data were available. MEASUREMENTS: State-by-state differences in prevalence of tube feeding, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of tube feeding ranged from 7.5% in Maine to 40.1% in Mississippi. Each state had a significantly elevated prevalence of tube feeding compared with Maine, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 1.50 to 5.83, P < .001. Specific directives not to provide tube feeding (OR 0.41, P < .001), and white race (OR 0.45, P < .001) were strongly and negatively associated with tube feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Wide regional variations exist in the use of tube feeding of nursing home residents with equivalent impairments. Sociodemographic factors could be important, but more study is needed to determine whether physician characteristics, such as race, attitudes, or knowledge, have an impact and to clarify medical standards for the use of tube feeding in this population.en_US
dc.format.extent118736 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rightsAmerican Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherEnteral Nutritionen_US
dc.subject.otherNutritional Supporten_US
dc.subject.otherNursing Homesen_US
dc.subject.otherAdvance Directivesen_US
dc.subject.otherMental Competencyen_US
dc.titleState Practice Variations in the Use of Tube Feeding for Nursing Home Residents with Severe Cognitive Impairmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute of Gerontology, University of Michigan and Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor VA GRECC, Ann Arbor, Michigan.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* Eileen E. Anderson Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Saint Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center, New York, and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPartnership for Caring, New York;en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11207868en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65463/1/j.1532-5415.2001.49035.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49035.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1.  The Hastings Center. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN : University Press, 1987, pp 59 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2.  American Medical Association. Decisions near the end of life. Current Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Chicago : American Medical Association, 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3.  American Nurses' Association. Guidelines on withdrawing or withholding food and fluid. Biolaw Update 1988 ; 2 : 1123 – 1126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4.  American College of Physicians. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part 2: The physician and society; research; life-sustaining treatment; other issues. Ann Intern Med 1989 ; 111 : 327 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5.  Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261,280 (1990).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsch DA, Faber-Langendoen K & Shea JA et al. The sequence of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments from patients. Am J Med 1999 ; 107 : 153 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeissman DE, Ambuel B & Norton AJ et al. A survey of competencies and concerns in end-of-life care for physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998 ; 15 : 82 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon MZ, O'donnell L & Jennings B. Decisions near the end of life: Professional views on life sustaining treatments. Am J Pub Health 1993 ; 83 : 14 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference9.  Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261,279 (1990).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference10.  Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S.Ct. 2258, 2270 (1997).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11.  N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 2982(2)(b).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference12.  MO. Ann. Stat.§ 459.010(3).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference13.  Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1337.13 (E).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhronheim JC. Artificial nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill patient. Clin Geriatr Med 1996 ; 12 ( 2 ): 379 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Hawes C & Fries BE et al. Designing the National Resident Assessment Instrument for nursing facilities. Gerontologist 1990 ; 30 ( 3 ): 293 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawes C, Morris JN & Phillips CD et al. Reliability estimates for the Minimum Data Set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening (MDS). Gerontologist 1995 ; 35 ( 2 ): 172 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Fries BE & Mehr DR et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol 1994 ; 49 : M174 – M182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference18.  SAS Institute. SAS Language, Version 6. Cary, NC : SAS Institute, 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson KJ, Nichols DH & Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 1993 ; 328 : 856 – 860.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLu-Yao GL, McLerran D & Wasson J et al. An assessment of radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1993 ; 269 : 2633 – 2636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSgadari A, Morris JN & Fries BE et al. Efforts to establish the reliability of the Resident Assessment Instrument. Age Ageing 1997 ; 26 ( Suppl 2 ): 27 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinucane TE & Bynum JP. Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia. Lancet 1996 ; 348 : 1421 – 1424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinucane TE. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: A review of the evidence. JAMA 1999 ; 282 : 1365 – 1370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell SL, Kiely DK & Lipsitz LA. The risk factors and impact on survival of feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment. Arch Intern Med 1997 ; 157 : 327 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference25.  Meier DE, Ahronheim JC, Morris J et al. High short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with advanced dementia: Lack of benefit of tube-feeding. Arch Intern Med. In press 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEleazer GP, Hornung CA & Egbert CB et al. The relationship between ethnicity and advance directives in a frail older population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996 ; 44 : 938 – 943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSulmasy DP, Song KY & Marx ES et al. Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med 1996 ; 11 : 657 – 663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopp FP & Duffy SA. Racial variations in end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000 ; 48 : 658 – 663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference29.  U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates for the U.S., Regions, and States by Selected Age Groups and Sex: Annual Time series, July 1, 1990 to July 1, 1999 [On-line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/state/st-99-09.txt, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrett JM, Harris RP & Norburn JK et al. Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: Who wants what? J Gen Intern Med 1993 ; 8 : 361 – 368.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'brien LA, Siegert EA & Grisso JA et al. Tube feeding preferences among nursing home residents. J Gen Intern Med 1997 ; 12 : 364 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMebane EW, Oman RF & Kroonen LT et al. The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision making. J Amer Geriatr Soc 1999 ; 47 : 579 – 591.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.