Show simple item record

Monotherapy Trials with Gabapentin for Partial Epilepsy

dc.contributor.authorBeydoun, Ahmad A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:08:32Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:08:32Z
dc.date.issued1999-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBeydoun, Ahmad (1999). "Monotherapy Trials with Gabapentin for Partial Epilepsy." Epilepsia 40(): s13-s16. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65608>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-9580en_US
dc.identifier.issn1528-1167en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65608
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10530677&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy and safety of gabapentin as monotherapy for treatment of partial onset seizures were evaluated in three large multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-controlled trials. In the first trial, 275 outpatients with refractory partial epilepsy maintained on stable doses of one or two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were switched to gabapentin (GBP) monotherapy at 600 mg, 1200 mg, or 2400 mg daily. Patients were required to exit the 26-week double-blind phase of the study if they experienced worsening of seizure frequency. With respect to time to exit, there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups; only 3% of patients withdrew from the trial because of adverse events. In the second study, 82 hospitalized patients with medically refractory epilepsy were tapered off baseline AEDs and randomly assigned to GBP monotherapy at 300 mg/day or 3600 mg/day. Patients remained in the trial for a maximum of 8 days but had to exit the trial if they experienced one or more exit events. Time to exit was significantly longer in patients in the 3600-mg group (151 h) compared with those in the 300-mg group (85 h) ( p = 0.0001). None of the patients withdrew from the trial because of side effects. In the third study, 292 patients with newly diagnosed partial seizures were randomized to GBP 300, 900, or 1800 mg/day or to carbamazepine (CBZ) 600 mg/day. Patients remained in the trial for up to 6 months or until they experienced an exit event. Mean time to exit was significantly longer for patients who received GBP 900 mg/day ( p = 0.02) or 1800 mg/day ( p = 0.04) compared with those who received 300 mg/day. The completion rate for the CBZ group (37%) was similar to that of the GBP 900-mg (39%) and 1800-mg (38%) groups. Patients receiving CBZ had a higher withdrawal rate because of adverse events compared with the GBP 900-mg and 1800-mg groups. The results of these trials provide good evidence of the efficacy and safety of GBP as monotherapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures.en_US
dc.format.extent337627 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1999 International League Against Epilepsyen_US
dc.subject.otherGabapentinen_US
dc.subject.otherMonotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherNewly Diagnosed Seizuresen_US
dc.subject.otherPartial-onset Seizuresen_US
dc.subject.otherRefractory Epilepsyen_US
dc.titleMonotherapy Trials with Gabapentin for Partial Epilepsyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid10530677en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65608/1/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00927.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00927.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEpilepsiaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnhut H, Ashman P, Feuerstein TJ, Sauermann W, Saunders M, Schmidt B. Gabapentin (Neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The International Gabapentin Study Group. Epilepsia 1994 ; 35 : 795 – 801.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2. UK Gabapentin Study Group. Gabapentin in partial epilepsy. Lancet 1990 ; 335 : 1114 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3. The US Gabapentin Study Group No. 5. Gabapentin as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Neurology 1993 ; 43 : 2292 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeydoun A, Fischer J, Labar DR, et al. Gabapentin monotherapy: II. A 26-week, double-blind, dose-controlled, multicenter study of conversion from polytherapy in outpatients with refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures. The US Gabapentin Study Group 82/83. Neurology 1997 ; 49 : 746 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeber PD. Hazards of inference: the active control investigation. Epilepsia 1989 ; 30 : ( suppl 1 ): S57 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeydoun A, Fakhoury T, Nasreddine W, Abou-Khalil B. Conversion to high dose gabapentin monotherapy in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. Epilepsia 1998 ; 39 : 188 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergey GK, Morris HH, Rosenfeld W, et al. Gabapentin monotherapy: I. An 8-day, double-blind, dose-controlled, multicenter study in hospitalized patients with refractory complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures. The US Gabapentin Study Group 88/89. Neurology 1997 ; 49 : 739 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChadwick DW, Anhut H, Greiner MJ, et al. A double-blind trial of gabapentin monotherapy for newly diagnosed partial seizures. International Gabapentin Monotherapy Study Group 945–77. Neurology 1998 ; 51 : 1282 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroderick E. Prescribing patterns for nursing home residents in the US. The reality and the vision. Drugs Aging 1997 ; 11 : 255 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonette J, Gurwitz JH, Avorn J. Epidemiology of adverse drug events in the nursing home setting. Drugs Aging 1995 ; 7 : 203 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrilling JS, Kelso EB. Selections from current literature: some common geriatric concerns. Fam Pract 1998 ; 15 : 269 – 74.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.