Show simple item record

Evaluation and Use of an Index of Oral Health Status

dc.contributor.authorLang, Walter Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorgnakke, Wenche S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, George W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoolfolk, Marilyn W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRonis, David L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNyquist, Linda V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:11:03Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:11:03Z
dc.date.issued1997-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationLang, W. Paul; Borgnakke, Wenche S.; Taylor, George W.; Woolfolk, Marilyn W.; Ronis, David L.; Nyquist, Linda V. (1997). "Evaluation and Use of an Index of Oral Health Status." Journal of Public Health Dentistry 57(4): 233-242. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65652>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4006en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-7325en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65652
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9558627&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The goals of this investigation were (1) to evaluate the Oral Health Status Index in relation to demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and preventive behaviors of an adult population; and (2) to understand how individual index components performed as indicators of oral health status compared to the composite index. Methods : The Oral Health Status Index (OHSI) was used on a probability sample of adults, aged 18–93 years, living in the Detroit tricounty area. Data were collected on 509 subjects via in-home dental examinations. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the OHSI and its components, including decayed, missing, and replaced teeth, free ends, and moderate and severe periodontal disease measures. Results : The mean OHSI score for subjects was 77.3 (se=1.83) with a range of -8.0 to 100.0. In regression analyses, OHSI scores were positively correlated with subjects' education level, self-rated oral health scores, and frequency of dental checkups and negatively correlated with age, nonwhite race, and smoking. Of the index components, missing teeth performed well as an indicator of oral health status. Missing teeth were positively correlated with age, nonwhite race, and smoking and negatively correlated with education level, self-rated oral health, and use of Medicaid. About 53 percent of variance in OHSI scores was explained by the multivariate models, compared to 46 percent for missing teeth. Conclusions : Choosing an indicator of oral health status likely will depend upon the characteristics of the population to be studied. As a composite measure of oral health status, the OHSI performed acceptably; however, missing teeth, an index component, also worked well. Continued evaluation of the OHSI is warranted.en_US
dc.format.extent1110658 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1997 by the American Association of Public Health Dentistryen_US
dc.subject.otherOral Health Statusen_US
dc.subject.otherIndexen_US
dc.subject.otherConstruct Validationen_US
dc.subject.otherPopulation Studiesen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and Use of an Index of Oral Health Statusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDr. Lang, Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, 1011 North University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–1078. E-mail: wplang@umich.edu . Dr. Ronis is affiliated with the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research and School of Nursing and US Department of Veterans Affairs. Drs. Borgnakke, Taylor, Woolfolk, and Nyquist are at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry in Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9558627en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65652/1/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02980.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02980.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Public Health Dentistryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt B, Eklund S. Dentistry, dental practice and the community. Philadelphia : Saunders, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunning J. Principles of dental public health. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1979.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoulter ID, Marcus M, Atchison KA. Measuring oral health status: theoretical and methodological challenges. Soc Sci Med 1994 ; 38 : 1531 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReisine S. An overview of self-reported outcome assessment in dental research. J Dent Educ 1996 ; 60 : 488 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus M, Koch AL, Gershen JA. A proposed index of oral health status: a practical application. J Am Dent Assoc 1983 ; 107 : 729 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 1976 ; 11 : 478 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus M, Koch A, Gershen J. Construction of a population index of adult oral health status derived from dentists' preferences. J Public Health Dent 1983 ; 43 : 284 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBulman J. Demand and need for dental care; a socio-dental study. London : Oxford University Press, 1968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikias M, Sollecito W, Fink R. An empirical approach to developing multidimensional oral status profiles. J Public Health Dent 1978 ; 38 : 148 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikias M, Sollecito W, Fink R. An oral health index based on ranking oral health profiles by panels of dental professionals. J Public Health Dent 1979 ; 39 : 16 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoch AL. Application of a paired preference computer scaling technique to model expert decision making for the development of an oral health status index. Los Angeles : University of California, 1981.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus M, Koch A, Gershen J. An empirically derived measure of oral health status for adult populations. J Public Health Dent 1980 ; 40 : 334 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus M, Gershen J, Koch A. Indirect and direct adult oral health status index user's guide. Development of oral health status measures for quality assurance. Los Angeles : University of California, 1980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraun RJ. A methodology for a pilot study to develop a geriatric oral health status index. J Dent Educ 1985 ; 49 : 753 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1973 ; 51 : 95 – 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter ? J Health Soc Behav 1995 ; 36 : 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAday LA, Andersen R. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv Res 1974 ; 9 : 208 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang WP, Ronis DL, Farghaly MM. Preventive behaviors as correlates of periodontal health status. J Public Health Dent 1995 ; 55 : 10 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang WP, Farghaly MM, Ronis DL. The relation of preventive dental behaviors to periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 1994 ; 21 : 194 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorlen P, Ostberg H, Bjorn AL. Relationship between general health, social factors and oral health in women at the age of retirement. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991 ; 19 : 296 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEklund SA, Burt BA. Risk factors for total tooth loss in the United States; longitudinal analysis of national data. J Public Health Dent 1994 ; 54 : 5 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocker D. Smoking and oral health in older adults. Can J Public Health 1992 ; 83 : 429 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller AJ, Brunelle JA, Carlos JP, Brown LJ, LÖe H. Oral health of United States adults. The national survey of oral health in US employed adults and seniors: 1985–1986. National findings. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt R. Percent agreement, Pearson's correlation, and kappa as measures of inter-examiner reliability. J Dent Res 1986 ; 65 : 128 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference25. American Academy of Periodontology's Research, Science, and Therapy Committee. Epidemiology of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 1996 ; 67 : 935 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen MS. Oral health of disadvantaged populations. In : Cohen L, Gift H, eds. Disease prevention and oral health promotion. Copenhagen : Munksgaard, 1995 : 153 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference27. Public Health Service's Oral Health Coordinating Committee. Toward improving the oral health of Americans: an overview of oral health status, resources, and care delivery. Public Health Rep 1993 ; 108 : 657 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrandsen A. Mechanical oral hygiene practices. State-of-the-science review. In : LÖe H, Kleinman DV, eds. Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. Bethesda, MD : IRL Press, 1985 : 93 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988 ; 5 : 3 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReisine ST, Bailit HL. Clinical oral health status and adult perceptions of oral health. Soc Sci Med 1980 ; 14A : 597 – 605.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGooch B, Dolan T, Bourque L. Correlates of self-reported dental health status upon enrollment in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. J Dent Educ 1989 ; 53 : 629 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtchison K, Dolan T. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ 1990 ; 54 : 680 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994 ; 11 : 3 – 11.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.