Show simple item record

Nationalism, Nuclear Policy and Children in Cold War America

dc.contributor.authorStephens, Sharonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:33:30Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:33:30Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationSTEPHENS, SHARON (1997). "Nationalism, Nuclear Policy and Children in Cold War America." Childhood 1(4): 103-123. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66481>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0907-5682en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66481
dc.description.abstractIn the wake of the Cold War era, researchers have begun to theorize the US national security state. This article is a preliminary attempt to theorize the place of children and childhood in the American `Cold War Consensus' of the 1950s and early 1960s. Children were widely depicted in the Cold War era as innocent beings at the heart of the contained domestic world, as objects of strictly gender-divided parental care and protection, and as the vulnerable core of American society, whose protection from foreign enemies required the construction of a vast and powerful nuclear defense system. The article counterposes dominant Cold War images of abstract, generic children (invariably presented as white and middle class) to the actual children most vulnerable to risks associated with nuclear weapons production and testing, and with government-sponsored radiation experiments. In various ways, these were all seen as `deviant' children, whose lives could legitimately be put at risk in the interests of safeguarding `normal' children at the heart of Cold War visions of American society.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2347494 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherChildrenen_US
dc.subject.otherCold Waren_US
dc.subject.otherNationalismen_US
dc.subject.otherNuclear Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherUSen_US
dc.titleNationalism, Nuclear Policy and Children in Cold War Americaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USA sharonks@umich.eduen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66481/2/10.1177_0907568297004001006.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0907568297004001006en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, Benedict (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaverstock, K.F. and J.W. Stather (eds) (1989) Low Dose Radiation: Biological Bases of Risk Assessment. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertell, Rosalie (1985) No Immediate Danger. London: Women's Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, Joanne (1988) `“A is for Atom, B is for Bomb”: Civil Defense in American Public Education, 1948-63', Journal of American History75: 68-90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChivan, Michael Mc Cally, Howard Hu and Andrew Haines (eds) (1993) Critical Condition: Human Health and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen, Terje and Jon B. Reitan (1993) `Radiation Risks: Which Types of Risks are of Significance for Children?', in Karin Ekberg and Per Egil Mjaavatn (eds) Children at Risk: Selected Papers, pp 71-78. Trondheim: The Norwegian Centre for Child Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohn, Carol (1987) `Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals', in Diane E.H. Russell (ed.) Exposing Nuclear Phallacies, pp 127-163. New York: Pergamon Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoontz, Stephanie (1992) The Way We Never Were: America's Families and the Nostalgia Trap. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorber, Robert, J. (1993) In the Name of National Security: Hitchcock, Homophobia, and the Political Construction of Gender in Postwar America. Durham and London: Duke University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD'Antonio, Michael (1993) Atomic Harvest: Hanford and the Lethal Toll of America's Nuclear Arsenal. New York: Crown Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEaslea, Brian (1983) Fathering the Unthinkable: Masculinity, Scientists and the Nuclear Arms Race. London: Pluto Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallagher, Carole (1993) American Ground Zero: The Secret Nuclear War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, Michelle Stenehjem (1992) On the Home Front: The Cold War Legacy of the Hanford Site. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraebner, William (1980) `The Unstable World of Benjamin Spock: Social Engineering in a Democratic Culture: 1917-1950', Journal of American History67(3): 612-629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolt, John (1975) Escape from Childhood. Harmondsworth: Penguin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) and IEER (Institute for Energy and Environmental Research) (1991) Radioactive Heaven and Earth: The Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Testing In, On, and Above the Earth. New York: Apex Press/London: Zed Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston, Barbara Rose (1994) `Experimenting on Human Subjects: Nuclear Weapons Testing and Human Rights Abuse', in Barbara Rose Johnston (ed.) Who Pays the Price: The Sociocultural Context of Environmental Crisis, pp. 131-142. Washington, DC: Island Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakhijani, Arjun and Ellen Kennedy (1994) `Human Radiation Experiments in the United States', Science for Democratic Action3(1): 1-7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMay, Elaine Tyler (1988) Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisrach, Richard (1990) Bravo 20: The Bombing of the American West. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewsweek (1994) `Nuclear Secrets', 3January: 22-24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider, Keith (1993) `50 Memo Shows Radiation Test Doubts', The New York Times28December: A8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwerdlow, Amy (1982) `Ladies Day at the Capitol: Women Strike for Peace versus HUAC', Feminist Studies8: 493-520.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.