Show simple item record

Changing Behavior and Making it Stick

dc.contributor.authorDe Young, Raymonden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:42:14Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:42:14Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.citationDe Young, Raymond (1993). "Changing Behavior and Making it Stick." Environment and Behavior 25(3): 485-505. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66636>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-9165en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66636
dc.description.abstractA sustainable planet is not possible without patterns of conserving behavior. The resource-costly life-styles that are characteristic of the current scene present a historic challenge. Never before have so many behaviors needed to change in so short a time. More challenging is that they must stay changed. For many reasons the techniques commonly used to promote conservation behavior are more reliable at modulating short-term behavior than at achieving durable change. The perceived urgency of environmental problems tends to make immediate behavior change the major focus. But of equal importance is the stability of behavior once changed. Thus one goal of conservation behavior research is to discover techniques that change individual behavior while minimizing or eliminating the need for repeated intervention. This article categerorizes behavior change techniques first by their informational or motivational nature and second by the source of the change: derived from others or gained by direct personal involvement. Evaluating selected techniques using five proposed dimensions suggests why durable behavior change has been so hard to achieve. Research implications are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1950493 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleChanging Behavior and Making it Sticken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66636/2/10.1177_0013916593253003.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0013916593253003en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEnvironment and Behavioren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirch, D., & Veroff, J. (1966). Motivation: A study of action. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrehm, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, G. D. (in press). Environmental challenges and managerial responses. In N. Choucri (Ed.), Global commons: Environmental challenges and international responses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurn, S. M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611-629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29-41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCondry, J., & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of rewards: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 61-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCone, J. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Environmental problems/behavioral solutions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, S. W., & Berrenberg, J. L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 73-107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeci, E. L. (1992). On the nature and functions of motivation theories. Psychological Science, 3, 167-171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R. (1985-1986). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 281-292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18, 435-449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R. (1988-1989). Exploring the difference between recyclers and nonrecyclers: The role of information. Journal of Environmental Systems, 18, 341-351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R. (1990). Recycling as appropriate behavior: A review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3, 253-266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R., & Kaplan, S. (1985-1986). Conservation behavior and the structure of satisfactions. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 233-242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Young, R., & Kaplan, S. (1988). On averting the tragedy of the commons. Environmental Management, 12, 273, 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161-202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345-351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFolz, D. H. (1991). Recycling program design, management, and participation: A national survey of municipal experience. Public Administration Review, 51(3), 222-231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, E. S. (1987). Applied behavior analysis and environmental psychology: From strange bedfellows to a productive marriage. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 361-388). New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, E. S. (1989). Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 17-36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, E. S. (1992). Solving environmental problems: A behavior change perspective. In S. Staub & P. Green (Eds.), Psychology and social responsibility: Facing global challenges (pp. 248-268). New York: New York University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, E. S., Needleman, L. D., & Randall, K. (1990). Developing a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for environmental protection. In Proceedings of the First U.S. Conference on Municipal Solid Waste Management: Solutions for the 90s (Vol. 3, pp. 1261-1285). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavioral change. New York Pergamon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranzin, K. L., & Olsen, J. E. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 1-27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, D. B. (1985). Ecological beliefs and behaviors: Assessment and change. Westport, CT: Greenwood.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan, S. (1990). Being needed, adaptive muddling and human-environment relationships. EDRA 21. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Oklahoma City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatzev, R. D. (1986). The impact of commitment in promoting consumer energy conservation. In E. Monnier, G. Gaskell, P. Ester, B. Joerges, B. Lapillonne, C. Midden, & L. Puiseux (Eds.), Consumer behavior and energy policy: An international perspective (pp. 280-294). New York: Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatzev, R. D. (1989, February). How to motivate recycling: Applying minimal justification techniques. Paper presented at the Association for Conservation Information's Winter Workshop, Arlington, VA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatzev, R. D., & Johnson, T. R. (1983). A social-psychological analysis of residential electricity consumption: The impact of minimal justification techniques. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 267-284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatzev, R. D., & Johnson, T. R. (1987). Promoting energy conservation: An analysis of behavioral research. Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatzev, R. D., & Pardini, A. U. (1987-1988). The comparative effectiveness of rewards and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 17, 93-113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreutzwiser, R. (1991). Municipal recycling programs and household conservation behaviour. (ER 508G, funded by the Research and Technology Branch of Environment Ontario). Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Department of Geography.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLamb, R. E. (1990). The quarterly ear. COPPE Quarterly, 4(1), 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepper, M. R. (1981). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls. In W. Collins (Ed.), Aspects of the development of competence: The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 14, 155-160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289-309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (Eds.). (1978). The hidden costs of rewards: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazis, M. R. (1975). Antipollution measures and psychological reactance theory: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 654-660.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Clelland, L., & Canter, R. J. (1981). Psychological research on energy conservation: Context, approaches, methods. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology: Volume 3. Energy conservation: Psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonroe, M. C., & Kaplan, S. (1988). When words speak louder than actions: Environmental problem solving in the classroom. Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 38-41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen, J. M., & Ellington, B. L. (1983). Social processes and resource conservation: A case study in low technology recycling. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 288-312). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNolan, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494-519.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePardini, A. U., & Katzev, R. D. (1983-1984). The effects of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 245-254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePintrich, P. R., & Garcia, G. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePittman, T. S., Emery, J., & Boggiano, A. K. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced change in preference for complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 789-797.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, J. W., & Robertson, J. L. (1979). Reactance and norm appeal in antilittering messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 91-101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon, H. A. (1992). What is an "explanation" of behavior?Psychological Science, 3, 150-161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStem, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStem, P. C., & Aronson, E. (Eds.). (1984). Energy use: The human dimension. New York: Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStem, P. C., Dietz, T., & Black, J. S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStem, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1043-1088). New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1991, Spring/Summer). EDFs new recycling campaign. Reusable news. Communications Services Branch (OS-305). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVargish, T. (1980). Why the person sitting next to you hates limits to growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16, 179-189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, T. H., & Katzev, R. D. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 265-275.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.