Show simple item record

The Creation and Development of an Interest Group: Life at the Intersection of Big Business and Education Reform

dc.contributor.authorSipple, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiskel, Cecilen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatheney, Timothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKearney, C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:46:50Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:46:50Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationSipple, John; Miskel, Cecil; Matheney, Timothy; Kearney, C. (1997). "The Creation and Development of an Interest Group: Life at the Intersection of Big Business and Education Reform." Educational Administration Quarterly 33(4): 440-473. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66716>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-161Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66716
dc.description.abstractResponding to calls from the president of the United Sates and the Business Roundtable, business leaders have become increasingly involved in setting the education reform agenda. Using five interest group theories and longitudinal data; the authors examined the formation, agenda setting, and maintenance of an organization of business leaders. Moderate support was found for each of the theories. Analyses further revealed that policy interests and to a lesser degree, functional interests were important to the formation and activity of the interest group. To forge successful partnerships and to implement effective reform, educators, policy makers, and researchers must better understand the motives and actions that impel business involvement in educationen_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent3648746 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleThe Creation and Development of an Interest Group: Life at the Intersection of Big Business and Education Reformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDartmouth Collegeen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66716/2/10.1177_0013161X97033004003.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0013161X97033004003en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEducational Administration Quarterlyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorman, K., Castenell, L., & Gallagher, K. (1993). Business involvement in school reform: The rise of the Business Roundtable. In C. Marshal (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender (pp. 69-83). Washington, DC: Falmer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusiness Roundtable (BRT). (1990). 7he Business Roundtable participation guide: A pimer for business on education. Washington, DC: Author.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusiness Roundtable (BRT). (1992). The essential components of a successful education: Putting policy into practice. Washington, DC: Author.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCuban, L. (1992). The corporate myth of reforming public schools.Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 157-159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamison, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in American schools. New York: Crown.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Closkey, H., Hoffman, P., & O'Hara, R. (1960). Issue conflict and consensus among party leaders and followers.American Political Science Review, 54, 406-427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Farland, A. S. (1987). Interest groups and theories of power in America.British Journal of Political Science, 17, 129-147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Farland, A. S. (1992). Interest groups and the policy-making process: Sources of countervailing power in America. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed (pp. 58-79). Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoe, T. (1980). The organization of interests: Incentives and the internal dynamics of political interest groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, M. J. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetracca, M. P. (Ed.). (1992). The politics of interest: Interest groups transformed. Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlotke, D. (1992). The political mobilization of business. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed (pp. 175-198). Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRay, C. A., & Mickelson, R. A. (1990). Corporate leaders, resistant youth, and school reform in Sunbelt City.Social Problems, 37, 178-190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabatier, P. A. (1992). Interest group membership and organization: Multiple theories. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed (pp. 99-129). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabatier, P. A., & Mc Laughlin, S. (1990). Belief congruence between interest group leaders and members: An empirical analysis of three theories and a suggested synthesis.Journal of Politics, 52, 914-935.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups.Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1-32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, C. S., & Hrebenar, R. J. (1992). Changing patterns of interest group activity. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interest: Interest groups transformed (pp. 150-174). Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTruman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process. New York: Knopf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Chamber of Commerce. (1982). American education: An economic issue. Washington, DC: Author.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, J. L., Jr. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions, and social movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.