Show simple item record

The Long-Term Effects of Seventh-Grade Ability Grouping in Mathematics

dc.contributor.authorFuligni, Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.authorEccles, Jacquelynne S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Bonnie L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:14:54Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:14:54Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationFuligni, Andrew; Eccles, Jacquelynne; Barber, Bonnie (1995). "The Long-Term Effects of Seventh-Grade Ability Grouping in Mathematics." The Journal of Early Adolescence 15(1): 58-89. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67207>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0272-4316en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67207
dc.description.abstractFew definitive answers exist as to the implications of ability grouping for children's development. Perhaps the most significant source of this inconclusiveness has been the absence of a longitudinal perspective and long-term studies of the effects of ability grouping on children's development. To address this need, this study examined the long-term correlates of being placed in an ability-grouped mathematics class on entry into junior high school. Results revealed some negative and no positive correlates at the tenth-grade level for low-ability students placed in low-ability classrooms compared with their peers placed in ungrouped classrooms. Conversely, a number of positive correlates of ability grouping were found for medium- and high-ability students. Discussion focuses on the role of ability grouping in junior high school as a sorting event which sets youths on different trajectories that have implications for their later academic, career; and personal development.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2481704 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleThe Long-Term Effects of Seventh-Grade Ability Grouping in Mathematicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPennsylvania State Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67207/2/10.1177_0272431695015001005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0272431695015001005en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Early Adolescenceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander, K. A., & Mc Dill, E. L. (1976). Selection and allocation within schools: Some causes and consequences of curriculum placement. American Sociological Review, 43, 47-66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne, B. M. (1988). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Reexamining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46-67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawson, M. M. (1987). Beyond ability grouping: A review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives. School Psychology Review, 16, 348-369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J. Adler, T. & Meece J.L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement. A test of alternative theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles (Parsons), J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: Wm. Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J., Adler, T., & Meece, J.L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternative theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146-1183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGood, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38, 415-427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffer, T. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 205-227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIanni, F.A.J. (1989). The search for structure: A report on American youth today. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKandel, D. B., & Lesser, G. S. (1972). Youth in two worlds. London: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulik, C. L., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415-428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23, 22-30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarascuilo, L. A., & Mc Sweeney, M. (1972). Tracking and minority student attitudes and performance. Urban Education, 6, 303-319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOakes, J. (1985). Keeping track.- How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReuman, D. A., Mac Iver, D., Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1987, April). Changes in students' mathematics motivation and behavior at the transition to junior high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical problems and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRutter, M. (1989). Pathways from childhood to adult life. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 23-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.