Show simple item record

International Preferences in Selecting Mates

dc.contributor.authorBuss, David M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, Maxen_US
dc.contributor.authorAngleitner, Aloisen_US
dc.contributor.authorAsherian, Armenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBiaggio, Angelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlanco-Villasenor, Angelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruchon-Schweitzer, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCh'U, Hai-Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCzapinski, Januszen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeraad, Boeleen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkehammar, Boen_US
dc.contributor.authorEl Lohamy, Nohaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFioravanti, Marioen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgas, Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjerde, Peren_US
dc.contributor.authorGuttman, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorHazan, Fatimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIwawaki, Saburoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanakiramaiah, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKhosroshani, Fatemehen_US
dc.contributor.authorKreitler, Shulamithen_US
dc.contributor.authorLachenicht, Lanceen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.authorLiik, Kadien_US
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Brianen_US
dc.contributor.authorMika, Stanislawen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoadel-Shahid, Mariamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoane, Geraldineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMontero, Maritzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMundy-Castle, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNiit, Toomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorNsenduluka, Evaristoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPienkowski, Ryszarden_US
dc.contributor.authorPirtila-Backman, Anne-Maijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Leon, Julioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRousseau, Jacquesen_US
dc.contributor.authorRunco, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorSafir, Marilynen_US
dc.contributor.authorSamuels, Curtisen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanitioso, Rasyiden_US
dc.contributor.authorSerpell, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorSmid, Nicoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Christopheren_US
dc.contributor.authorTadinac, Merien_US
dc.contributor.authorTodorova, Elkaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTroland, Karien_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Den Brande, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Heck, Guusen_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Langenhove, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYang, Kuo-Shuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:42:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:42:46Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationBuss, David; Abbott, Max; Angleitner, Alois; Asherian, Armen; Biaggio, Angela; Blanco-Villasenor, Angel; Bruchon-Schweitzer, M.; Ch'U, Hai-Yuan; Czapinski, Janusz; Deraad, Boele; Ekehammar, Bo; El Lohamy, Noha; Fioravanti, Mario; Georgas, James; Gjerde, Per; Guttman, Ruth; Hazan, Fatima; Iwawaki, Saburo; Janakiramaiah, N.; Khosroshani, Fatemeh; Kreitler, Shulamith; Lachenicht, Lance; Lee, Margaret; Liik, Kadi; Little, Brian; Mika, Stanislaw; Moadel-Shahid, Mariam; Moane, Geraldine; Montero, Maritza; Mundy-Castle, A.; Niit, Toomas; Nsenduluka, Evaristo; Pienkowski, Ryszard; Pirtila-Backman, Anne-Maija; De Leon, Julio; Rousseau, Jacques; Runco, Mark; Safir, Marilyn; Samuels, Curtis; Sanitioso, Rasyid; Serpell, Robert; Smid, Nico; Spencer, Christopher; Tadinac, Meri; Todorova, Elka; Troland, Kari; Van Den Brande, L.; Van Heck, Guus; Van Langenhove, L.; Yang, Kuo-Shu (1990). "International Preferences in Selecting Mates." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21(1): 5-47. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67686>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0221en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67686
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to identify the effects of culture and sex on mate preferences using samples drawn world-wide. Thirty-seven samples were obtained from 33 countries located on six continents and five islands (N = 9,474). Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed strong effects of both culture and sex, moderated by specific mate characteristics. Chastity proved to be the mate characteristic on which cultures varied the most. The preference ordering of each sample was contrasted with an international complement. Each culture displayed a unique preference ordering, but there were some similarities among all cultures as reflected in a positive manifold of the cross-country correlation matrix. Multidimensional scaling of the cultures yielded a five dimensional solution, the first two of which were interpreted. The first dimension was interpreted as Traditional versus Modern, with China, India, Iran, and Nigeria anchoring one end and the Netherlands, Great Britain, Finland, and Sweden anchoring the other. The second dimension involved valuation of education, intelligence, and refinement. Consistent sex differences in value attached to eaming potential and physical attractiveness supported evolution-based hypotheses about the importance of resources and reproductive value in mates. Discussion emphasizes the importance of psychological mate preferences for scientific disciplines ranging from evolutionary biology to sociology.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2995115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleInternational Preferences in Selecting Matesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67686/2/10.1177_0022022190211001.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022022190211001en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBateson, P. (1983). Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 157-215). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuss, D. M. (in press). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuss, D. M., & Barnes, M. F. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDigman, J., & Inoye, I. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116-123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGough, H. G. (1973). Personality assessment in the study of population. In J. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population (pp. 329-353). New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, T. R. (1978). Sexual selection and mate choice. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 180-213). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudson, J. W., & Henze, L. F. (1969). Campus values in mate selection: A replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 772-775.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Crae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Ginnis, R. (1958). Campus values in mate selection. Social Forces, 36, 368-373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlomin, R., De Fries, J. C., & Mc Clearn, G. E. (1980). Behavioral genetics: A primer. San Francisco: Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShort, R. V. (1981). Sexual selection in man and the great apes. In C. E. Graham (Ed.), Reproductive biology of the great apes (pp. 319-341). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H., Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M. J. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971. Chicago: Aldine.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillerman, L. (1979). The psychology of individual and group differences. San Francisco: Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, J. E., Giles, J., Edwards, J. R., Best, D. L., and Daws, J. T. (1977). Sex-trait stereotypes in England, Ireland, and the United States. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16, 303-309.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.