Show simple item record

The Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performance

dc.contributor.authorWaung, Marieen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrice, Thomas S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:40:39Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:40:39Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationWaung, Marie; Brice, Thomas (1998). "The Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performance." Small Group Research 5(29): 624-634. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68467>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-4964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68467
dc.description.abstractGiven the increasing use of work teams in organizations, personnel selection procedures based on individual conscientiousness are likely to result in groups composed of highly conscientious members. This laboratory experiment examined the performance of groups of either high or low conscientious individuals, with the groups being given more (caucus condition) or less (no caucus condition) opportunity to develop performance norms. Groups of high-conscientious individuals given the chance to caucus were less productive than such groups that were not given the opportunity to caucus and less productive than groups of low-conscientious individuals given the chance to caucus. Thesefindings are explained in terms of the development of quality norms by the high-conscientious caucus groups at the expense of productivity.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent870453 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.en_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Conscientiousness and Opportunity to Caucus on Group Performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan-Dearbomen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Polk Companyen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68467/2/10.1177_1046496498295005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1046496498295005en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosta, P. T., Jr., Mc Crae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales foragreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Group, subgroup, and nominal group idea generation: New rules for a new media?Journal of Management, 2, 723-736.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHackman, J. R., & Kaplan, R. E. (1974). Interventions into group process: An approach improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sciences, 5, 459-480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interraterreliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89-92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 891-897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTegano, D. W., & Moran, J. D. (1989). Sex differences in the original thinking of preschool and elementary school children. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 101-110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTziner, A. E., & Eden, D. (1985). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85-93.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.