Show simple item record

Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modeling

dc.contributor.authorFornell, Claesen_US
dc.contributor.authorYi, Youjaeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:43:22Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:43:22Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationFORNELL, CLAES; YI, YOUJAE (1992). "Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modeling." Sociological Methods & Research 3(20): 291-320. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68513>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0049-1241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68513
dc.description.abstractAlthough methods for latent variable modeling that allow a joint analysis of measurement and theory have become popular, they are not without difficulties. As these difficulties have become more apparent, several researchers have recently called for a “two-step approach” to latent variable modeling in which measurement is evaluated separately from theory. This implies that programs for covariance structure analysis are not needed because factor analysis and regressions would suffice for analysis. Before a return to earlier practice using seemingly simpler analysis tools can be recommended, it seems prudent to consider the assumptions underlying a two-step approach. At least four implicit assumptions can be identified: (a) theory and measurement are independent, (b) results of factor analysis specifications can be generalized to other specifications, (c) the estimators have desirable statistical properties, and (d) the statistical test in one step is independent of the test in the other. The authors show that these assumptions cannot be met in general and that some of them are logically inconsistent. Thus any wholesale adoption of a two-step approach could have serious consequences.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2637332 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.titleAssumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modelingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68513/2/10.1177_0049124192020003001.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0049124192020003001en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAchinstein, Peter. 1968. Concepts of Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAjzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin103:411-423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, James C. and James A. Narus. 1984. “A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of the Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships.”Journal of Marketing48:62-74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, Norman H. 1970. “Functional Measurement and Psychophysical Judgment.”Psychological Review77:153-170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagozzi, Richard P. 1983. “Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Further Comment.”Journal of Consumer Research9:449-450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagozzi, Richard P. and Youjae Yi. 1989. “The Degree of Intention Formation as a Moderator of the Attitude-Behavior Relationship.”Social Psychology Quarterly52:266-279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. 1978. “The Interdependence of Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Data: Causal Modeling as an Approach to Construct Validation.” Pp. 267-302 in Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, edited by D. B. Kandel. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. 1985. Theory and Implementation of EQS, A Structural Equation Program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. 1986. “Structural Modeling and Psychometrika: An Historical Perspective on Growth and Achievements.”Psychometrika51:35-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. and C. P. Chou. 1987. “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.”Multivariate Behavioral Research16:78-117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. and Ab Mooijaart. 1989. “Choice of Structural Model via Parsimony: A Rationale Based on Precision.”Psychological Bulletin106:315-317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. and George Speckart. 1979. “Models of Attitude-Behavior Relations.”Psychological Review86:452-464.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler, Peter M. and George Speckart. 1981. “Attitudes `Causes' Behaviors: A Structural Equation Analysis.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40:226-238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlalock, Herbert M., Jr. 1969. Theory Construction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBollen, Kenneth A. 1987. “Outliers and Improper Solutions: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Example.”Sociological Methods & Research15:375-384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBollen, Kenneth A. 1989. Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgatta, Edgar F. and George W. Bohrnstedt. 1988. “A Review of the Background and History of the Fifteen Years of Sociological Methods and Research.”Sociological Methods & Research17:3-20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt, Ronald S. 1973. “Confirmatory Factor-Analysis Structures and the Theory Construction Process.”Sociological Methods & Research2:131-187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt, Ronald S. 1976. “Interpretational Confounding of Unobserved Variables in Structural Equation Models.”Sociological Methods & Research5:3-52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCliff, Norman. 1972. “Consistencies among Judgments of Adjective Combinations.” Pp. 163-182 in Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, edited by R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, and S. B. Nerlove. New York: Seminar Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCliff, Norman. 1983. “Some Cautions Concerning the Application of Causal Modeling Methods.”Multivariate Behavioral Research18:115-126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCudeck, Robert and Michael W. Browne. 1983. “Cross-Validation of Covariance Structures.”Multivariate Behavioral Research18:147-167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, Lee J. and Paul E. Meehl. 1955. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.”Psychological Bulletin52:281-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuncan, Otis D. 1984. Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFornell, Claes. 1983. “Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research9:443-448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFornell, Claes. 1989. “The Blending of Theoretical and Empirical Knowledge in Structural Equations with Unobservables.” Pp. 153-173 in Theoretical Empiricism, edited by H. Wold. New York: Paragon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuttman, Louis. 1971. “Measurement as Structural Theory.”Psychometrika36:329-347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall, J. L. 1978. “Stabilized Lasers and Precision Measurements.”Science202:147-156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanson, Norwood R. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerting, Jerry R. and Herbert L. Costner. 1985. “Respecification in Multiple Indicator Models.” Pp. 321-393 in Causal Models in the Social Sciences, edited by H. M. Blalock. New York: Hawthorne.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1980. “On How Not to Make Inferences About Measurement Error.”Quality and Quantity14:503-510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoran, Patrick M. 1989. “Causal Models of Measurement: Some Problems for Theory Construction.”Quality and Quantity23:39-59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston, J. 1984. Econometric Methods (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJÖreskog, Karl G. and Dag SÖrbom. 1984. LISREL VI User's Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan, David. 1989. “The Problem of Error Rate Inflation in Covariance Structure Models.”Educational and Psychological Measurement49:333-337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar, Ajith and William R. Dillon. 1987. “The Interaction of Measurement and Structure in Simultaneous Equation Models with Unobservable Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research24:98-105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLance, Charles E., John M. Cornwell, and Stanley A. Mulaik. 1988. “Limited Information Parameter Estimates for Latent or Mixed Manifest and Latent Variable Models.”Multivariate Behavioral Research23:171-187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarson, Harold J. and Theodore A. Bancroft. 1963. “Biases in Prediction by Regression for Certain Incompletely Specified Models.”Biometrika50:391-402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLohmÖller, Jan-Bernd. 1984. LVPLS, Program Manual, Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least-Squares Estimation. KÖln: Zentralarchiv FÜr Empirische Sozialforschung, Universitat zu KÖln, West Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong, J. Scott. 1983. Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuce, R. Duncan. 1972. “What Sort of Measurement Is Psychophysical Measurement?”American Psychologist27:96-106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMac Callum, Robert 1986. “Specification Searches in Covariance Structure Analyses.”Psychological Bulletin100:107-120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Ardle, J. Jack and Roderick P. Mc Donald. 1984. “Some Algebraic Properties of the Reticular Action Model for Moment Structures.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology37:234-251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Donald, Roderick P. 1978. “A Simple Comprehensive Model for the Analysis of Covariance Structures.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology31:59-72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthen, Bengt O. and David Kaplan. 1985. “A Comparison of Some Methodologies for the Factor Analysis of Non-Normal Likert Variables.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology38:171-189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunnally, Jum C. 1978. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePassmore, John. 1967. “Logical Positivism.” Pp. 52-57 in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5., edited by P. Edwards. New York:Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePawson, Ray. 1980. “Empiricist Measurement Strategies: A Critique of the Multiple Indicator Approach to Measurement.”Quality and Quantity14:651-678.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRindskopf, David. 1984. “Structural Equation Models: Empirical Identification, Heywood Cases, and Related Problems.”Sociological Methods & Research13:109-119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRindskopf, David and Tedd Rose. 1988. “Some Theory and Applications of Confirmatory Second-Order Factor Analysis.”Multivariate Behavioral Research23:51-67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSakahian, William S. 1982. History and Systems of Social Psychology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatorra, Albert and Willem E. Saris. 1985. “Power of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Covariance Structure Analysis.”Psychometrika50:83-90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelvin, Hanan C. and Alan Stuart. 1966. “Data-Dredging Procedures in Survey Analysis.”American Statistician20:20-23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiger, James H., Alexander Shapiro, and Michael W. Browne. 1985. “On the Multivariate Asymptotic Distribution of Sequential Chi-Square Statistics.”Psychometrika50:253-264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZinnes, Joseph L. 1969. “Scaling.”Annual Review of Psychology20:447-478.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.