Question Wording as an Independent Variable in Survey Analysis
dc.contributor.author | Schuman, Howard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Presser, Stanley | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-14T14:02:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-14T14:02:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1977 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Schuman, Howard; Presser, Stanley (1977). "Question Wording as an Independent Variable in Survey Analysis." Sociological Methods & Research 6(2): 151-170. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68832> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0049-1241 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68832 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper renews the line of research into the effects of changes in survey question wording and form which occupied researchers during the 1940s. We suggest two reasons for the cessation of such research: the idiosyncratic nature of many of the items experimented with and the near exclusive focus on single-variable distributions. In the present study, the experiments are based on decisions that face all survey investigators: whether to use agree-disagree statements or forced choice items; whether to ask open or closed questions; whether and how to balance alternatives offered; whether to include a middle alternative; and whether or not to filterfor no opinion. Furthermore, we examine the consequences of these decisions not only for univariate distributions but also for an item's relationship to education. The results from SRC national probability samples suggest thatfor thefirst two types, as well as for items involving variations in tone of word, the decisions may affect inferences about correlations with education. For the other three types the effects are restricted mainly to changes in marginals, although the no-opinion type shows a more limited kind of interaction with education. Finally, we present evidence that index construction is not an adequate solution to the question-wording problem. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 872405 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Question Wording as an Independent Variable in Survey Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68832/2/10.1177_004912417700600202.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/004912417700600202 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Sociological Methods & Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cantril, H. et al. (1944) Gauging Public Opinion. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Converse, P.E. (1970) "Attitudes and non-attitudes; continuation of a dialogue," pp. 168-189 in E. R. Tufte (ed.) The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davis, J.A. (1971) Elementary Survey Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ——— (1976) "Are surveys any good, and if so, for what?" pp. 32-38 in H. W. Sinaiko and L.A. Broedling (eds.), Perspectives On Attitude Assessment: Surveys and Their Alternatives. Champaign, II: Pendleton. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goodman, L. (1971) "The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classification," Technometrics 12: 33-61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jackman, M.R. (1973) "Education and prejudice or education and response-set?" American Soc. Rev. 38: 327-339. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1944) "The controversy over detailed interviews: an offer for negotiations." Public Opinion Q. 8: 38-60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lenski, G. (1963) The Religious Factor. Garden City, NY: Anchor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ---and J.C. Leggett (1960) "Caste, class and deference in the research interview." Amer. J. of Sociology 65: 463-467. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mc Nemar, Q. (1946) "Opinion-attitude methodology." Psych. Bul. 43: 289-374. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne, S.L. (1951) The Art of Asking Questions. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Presser, S. (1977) "Survey Question Wording and Attitudes in the General Public." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan (unpublished). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rugg, D. (1941) "Experiments in wording questions: II." Public Opinion Q. 5: 91-92. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schuman, H. and O.D. Duncan (1974) "Questions about attitude survey questions," pp. 232-251 in H. L. Costner (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1973-1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schuman, H. and J. Harding (1964) "Prejudice and the norm of rationality." Sociometry 27: 353-371. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schu Man, H. and S. Presser (1977) "Public opinion and legislative inaction on gun registration." Public Opinion Q. (forthcoming). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stouffer, S.A. (1955) Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stouffer, S.A., et al. (1950) Measurement and Prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stouffer, S.A., et al. (1949) The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.