View Item 

Show simple item record

Psychology

dc.contributor.authorFinholt, Thomas A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTeasley, Stephanieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:02:33Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:02:33Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationFinholt, Thomas; Teasley, Stephanie (1998). "Psychology." Social Science Computer Review 16(1): 40-52. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68835>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-4393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68835
dc.description.abstractThe Internet explosion and broad interest in collaborative technology have driven increased interest in the field of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). Historically, behavioral research on CSCW applications has reflected a strong influence from ethnomethodology. This article argues that the CSCW community should adopt a stronger orientation to other social science disciplines, particularly psychology. Greater attention to the psychological literature provides three benefits. First, psychologists offer well-validated principles about human behavior in group and organizational contexts that are relevant to CSCW research. Second, psychologists offer reliable and proven measures of human behavior that, if adopted by CSCW researchers, can provide a uniform basis for comparison across studies. Finally, psychologists offer data collection and analysis methods that identify salient and generalizable features of human behavior, which may lead to the development of universal principles of CSCW design.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1004879 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer-supported Cooperative Worken_US
dc.subject.otherDistributed Cognitionen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer-mediated Groupsen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEthnomethodologyen_US
dc.titlePsychologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68835/2/10.1177_089443939801600106.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/089443939801600106en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Science Computer Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbel, M.J. (1990). Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization In J. Galegher, R. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 489-510). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAccot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts' law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks Proceedings of ACM CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 295-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerman, M.S. (1994). Augmenting the organizational memory: A field study of Answer Garden In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 243-252). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAiello, J.R., & Kolb, K.J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAiello, J.R., & Svec, C.M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 537-548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldag, R.J., & Fuller, S.R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 533-552.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin, L.C., Liker, J.K., & Mc Leod, P.L. (1993). Who controls the technology in group support systems? Determinants and consequences Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 217-236.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalakrishnan, R., & Mac Kenzie, I.S. (1997). Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control Proceedings of ACM CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 303-310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBly, S., Harrison, S.R., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28-47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCard, S.K., Moran, T.P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll, J.M. (1997). Human computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 61-83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, H.H., & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 392-403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 541-547). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (1996). Cognition and communication at work Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinholt, T.A., & Olson, G.M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration Psychological Science, 8(1), 28-36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., & Rice, R. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 48-61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallupe, R.B., Cooper, W.H., Grise, M., & Bastianutti, L.M. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1) 77-86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge, J.M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191-202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGore, A. (1996). The metaphor of distributed intelligence Science, 272(5259), 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R.G. (1991). Social motivation Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 377-399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreeno, J., & Moore, J. (1993). Situativity and symbols Response to Vera and Simon Cognitive Science, 17(1), 49-59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1991). Cognitive and social processes in decision making In L B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 308-327). Washington, DC: APA Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeath, C.C., & Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London Underground control rooms In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 65-80). Slough, UK: Computer Sciences Company.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinckly, K., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Patten, J., & Kassell, N. (1997). Cooperative bimanual action Proceedings of ACM CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 27-34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinsz, V.B., Tindale, R.S., & Vollrath, D.A. (1997). The emerging conception of groups as information processors Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43-64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollingshead, A.B. (1996). The rank-order effect in group decision making Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processing, 68, 181-193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollingshead, A.B., & Mc Grath, J.E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollingshead, A.B., Mc Grath, J.E., & O'Connor, K.M. (1993) Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups Small Group Research, 24(3), 307-333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: The social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 191-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: APA Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHymes, C.M., & Olson, G.M. (1992). Unlocking brainstorming through the use of a simple group editor In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 99-106). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsaacs, E.A., Tang, J.C., & Morris, T. (1996). Piazza: A desktop environment supporting impromptu and planned interactions Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 315-324). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerr, N.L., & Stanfel, J.A. (1993). Role schemata and member motivation in task groups Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 432-442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processing, 52, 96-123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1996). A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and a human-like computer Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 47-65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraut, R.E., Miller, M.D., & Siegel, J. (1996). Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 57-66). New York : ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraut, R.E., Galegher, J., Fish, R., & Chalfonte, B. (1992). Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 375-407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLatour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, C. (1989). The relationship between goal-setting, self-efficacy, and female field hockey performance International Journal of Sport Psychology, 20(2), 147-161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1990). Progress in small group research Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, J.M., Resnick, L.B., & Higgins, E.T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel Psychological Science, 1(4), 240-246en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLosada, M., Sanchez, P., & Noble, E.E. (1990). Collaborative technology and group process feedback: Their impact on interactive sequences in meetings In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 53-64). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Leod, P.L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoorhead, G., Ference, R., & Neck, C.P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink Human Relations, 44(6), 539-550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoreland, R.L., Hogg, M.A., & Hains, S.C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeck, C.P., & Moorhead, G. (1995). Groupthink remodeled: The importance of leadership, time pressure, and methodical decision-making procedures Human Relations, 48(5), 537-557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Leary-Kelly, A.M., Martocchio, J.J., & Frink, D.D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285-1301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, J.S., Card, S.K., Landauer, T.K., & Olson, G.M. (1993). Computer-supported cooperative work: Research issues for the 90s Behavior and Information Technology, 12, 115-129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1996). My partner is a real dog: Cooperation with social agents In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 399-408). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePea, R.D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePycock, J., & Bowers, J. (1996). Getting others to get it right: An ethnography of design work in the fashion industry In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 219-228). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRader, C., Brand, C., & Lewis, C. (1997). Degrees of comprehension: Children's understanding of a visual programming environment Proceedings of ACM CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 351-366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition Washington, DC: APA Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRouncefield, M., Hughes, J.A., Rodden, T., & Viller, S. (1994). Working with "constant interruption": CSCW and the small office In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 275-286). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanna, L.J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774-786.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShapiro, A. (1994). The limits of ethnography: Combining social sciences for CSCW Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work '94, Chapel Hill, NC, 417-427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShepperd, J.A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 67-81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J., & Kahai, S.S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., & Walker, J.H. (1996). When the interface is a face Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 97-124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStasser, G., Taylor, L.A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D.G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., & Suchman, L. (1987). Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 32-47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStraus, S.G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStraus, S.G., & Mc Grath, J.E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 89-97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutton, R.I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 685-718.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTang, J.C., Isaacs, E.A., & Rua, M. (1994). Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 23-34). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerwilliger, R.B., & Polson, P.G. (1997). Relationship between users' and interfaces' task representations Proceedings of ACM CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 295-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToth, J.A. (1994). The effects of interactive graphics and text on social influence in computer-meditated small groups In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 299-310). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValicich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processing, 57, 448-467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValicich, J.S., George, J.F., Nunamaker, J.F., & Vogel, D.R. (1994). Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation Small Group Research, 25, 83-104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValicich, J.S., Wheeler, B.C., Mennecke, B.E., & Wachter, R. (1995). The effects of numerical and logical group size on computer-mediated idea generation Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processing, 62, 318-329.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur, A., Burnstein, E., Sechrest, L., & Wortman, P.M. (1985). Group decision making by experts: Field study of panels evaluating medical technologies Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 70-84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeingart, L.R. (1992). Impact of groups goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682-693.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisband, S.P., Schneider, S.K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information : Status salience and status differences Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeldon, E., & Weingart, L.R. (1993). Group goals and group performance British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 307-334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, P.H., Kjelgaard, M.M., & Harkins, S.G. (1995) Testing the contribution of self-evaluation to goal-setting effects Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 69-79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, K.D., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570-581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZare, R.N. (1997). Knowledge and distributed intelligence Science, 275(5303), 1047.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_089443939801600106.pdf
Size:
981.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.