Show simple item record

Family Planning Targets and Quality of Services: Workers' Perspectives and Dilemmas

dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorGhiron, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:18:28Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:18:28Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationSimmons, Ruth; Ghiron, Laura (1999). "Family Planning Targets and Quality of Services: Workers' Perspectives and Dilemmas." Journal of Health Management 1(2): 277-292. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69103>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0972-0634en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69103
dc.description.abstractThis paper uses data from in-depth group interviews with family planning workers in Bangladesh to demonstrate both the dysfunctional influence of family planning targets on quality of care as well as the strong connection between targets and the manage ment system. The findings show that the presence of targets influenced the advice and information workers provided, pushing them towards long-term methods such as steril isation and the IUD rather than helping clients select methods most suited to their needs. The paper then shows the connection between the target system and the struc ture of official and unofficial incentives, the pattern of supervision, the system of accountability and a hierarchically organised and gender-biased organisational cul ture. The authors argue that unless these underlying managerial determinants of qual ity of care are addressed, the hope for reaching the goals of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) will remain illusory.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent714941 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleFamily Planning Targets and Quality of Services: Workers' Perspectives and Dilemmasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Public Health, Department of Health Behaviour/Health Education, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69103/2/10.1177_097206349900100206.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/097206349900100206en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Health Managementen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce, Judith (1990). Fundamental elements of quality of care: A conceptual framework. Studies in Family Planning, 21(2), 61-91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrucker, Peter (1968). The practice of management. London: Pan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaaga, John G. and Rushikesh M. Maru (1996). The effects of operations research on program changes in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 27(2), 75-87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhallil, K. and C. Myntti (1994). Target-setting in family planning programs: Issues and controversies. Presented at the Population Council symposium on Family, Gender, and Population Policy: International Debates and Middle Eastern Realities, Cairo, Egypt, 7-9. February.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips, James F., R. Simmons, G.B. Simmons and Md. Yunus (1984). Transferring health and family planning service innovations to the public sector: An experiment in organization development in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 15(5), 212-21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSenge, Peter M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York : Doubleday.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard, Rinehart, Sharan Rudy and Megan Drennan (1998). GATHER guide to counseling: Population reports, Series J, No.48. Baltimore: Centre for Communication Programmes, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.