View Item 

Show simple item record

Location, Sex-Typing, and Salary among Academics

dc.contributor.authorFox, Maryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:18:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:18:46Z
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.citationFOX, MARY (1985). "Location, Sex-Typing, and Salary among Academics." Work and Occupations 2(12): 186-205. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69108>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0730-8884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69108
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses upon the effect of intra-university location as it influences the salaries of academics, as it differs for men and women, and as it relates to sex-typing of university locations. The findings indicate the greater importance of intra-university location in determining the salaries of academic men compared to women. However, certain patterns do emerge for both sexes. Namely, for some types of locations, the salary returns are dependent primarily upon attainment levels; for others, they are not; and in almost all cases these effects are more marked for men. Moreover, we discern a particular pattern of salary returns to sex-typed location. That is, for both sexes, certain same sex-typed locations are advantageous, and opposite sex-typed locations are generally disadvantageous, although again the effects are stronger for men than women. In conclusion, the article discusses implications that these observed patterns have for the operation of sex-disparity in salaries within the academic institution.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1649442 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.titleLocation, Sex-Typing, and Salary among Academicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69108/2/10.1177_0730888485012002004.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0730888485012002004en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASTIN, H. (1969) The Woman Doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASTIN, H. (1978) “Factors affecting women's scholarly productivity,” pp. 133-157 in H. Astin and W. S. Hirsch (eds.) The Higher Education of Women. New York: Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASTIN, H. and A. E. BAYER (1973) “Sex discrimination in academe,” pp. 333-356 in A. Rossi and A. Calderwood (eds.) Academic Women on the Move. New York: Russell Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBAYER, A. E. and H. ASTIN (1975) “Sex differentials in the academic reward system.”Science188 (May): 797-802.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBERNARD, J. (1964) Academic Women. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBLACKBURN, R. T., C. E. BEHYMER, and D. E. HALL (1978) “Research note: Correlates of faculty publications.”Sociology of Education51 (April): 132-141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCENTRA, J. A. (1974) Women, Men, and the Doctorate. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCOLE, J. and S. COLE (1973) Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDORNBUSH, S. M. (1979) “Perspectives from sociology: organizational evaluation of faculty performance,” pp. 41-60 in D. Lewis and W. Becker, Jr. (eds.) Academic Rewards and Higher Education. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDUNCAN, O. D. (1968) “Inheritance of poverty or inheritance of race,” pp. 85-110 in D. Moynihan (ed.) On Understanding Poverty. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEKSTROM, R. B. (1979) “Women Faculty: Development, Promotion, and Pay.”ETS Findings5:1-5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFERBER, M. A. (1974) “Professors, performance, and rewards.”Industrial Relations31 (February): 69-77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFERBER, M. A. and B. KORDICK (1978) “Sex differentials in the earnings of Ph.D.s”Industrial and Labor Relations Review31 (January): 227-238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFERBER, M. A., J. LOEB, and H. LOWRY (1978) “The economic status of women faculty: a reappraisal.”The Journal of Human Resources13: 385-401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFOX M. F. (1981) “Sex, Salary, and Achievement: Reward-Dualism in Academia.”Sociology of Education54 (April): 71-84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFUCHS, V. (1971) “Differences in hourly earnings between men and women.”Monthly Labor Review, 94 (May): 9-15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGORDON, N., T. E. MORTON, and I. C. BRADEN (1974) “Faculty salaries: Is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline?”American Economic Review64 (June): 419-427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHORNIG, L. S. (1979) Climbing the Academic Ladder: Doctoral Women Scientists in Academe. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKATZ, D. (1973) “Faculty salaries, promotion, and productivity at a large university.”American Economic Review63 (June): 469-477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLADD, E. and LIPSET, S. M. (1975) “Faculty women: Little Gain in Status.”The Chronicle of Higher Education II (September): 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Education Statistics (1981) Degrees Awarded to Women. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Education Statistics (1980) “Women faculty still lag in salary and tenure for 1979-80 academic year.”Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePATTERSON, M. (1973) “Sex specialization in academe and the professions,” pp. 313-331 in A. Rossi and A. Calderwood (eds.) Academic Women on the Move. New York: Russell Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceREES, A. and G. P. SCHULTZ (1970) Workers and Wages in an Urban Labor Market. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSIEGEL, P. M. (1965) “The cost of being a negro.”Soc. Inquiry35 (Winter): 41-47; 55: 412-457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSTEVENSON, M. H. (1975) “Relative wages and sex discrimination by occupation,” pp. 175-200 in C. Lloyd (ed.) Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSUTER, L. E. and H. P. MILLER (1973) “Components of differences between the incomes of men and career women.”Amer. Journal of Sociology78 (January): 962-974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSYNDER, D. and P. M. HUDIS (1976) “Occupational income and the effects of minority competition and segregation: a reanalysis and some new evidence.”American Sociological Review40 (April): 209-234.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWEISKOFF, F. B. (1972) “Woman's place in the labor market.”American Economic Review62 (May): 161-165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZUCKERMAN, H. (1971) “Women and blacks in American science: the principle of double penalty. Paper presented at Symposium on Women in American Science and Engineering, California Institute of Technology.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0730888485012002004.pdf
Size:
1.573MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.