Show simple item record

Theory is the Cart, Vision is the Horse: Reflections on Research in Diabetes Patient Education

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFunnell, Martha M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:21:34Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:21:34Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, Robert; Funnell, Martha (1999). "Theory is the Cart, Vision is the Horse: Reflections on Research in Diabetes Patient Education." The Diabetes Educator 25(): 43-51. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69155>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0145-7217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69155
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10711084&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE In this paper, we examine the nature of vision and the role it plays in helping educators identify and use theories productively. We also discuss the role of theory in diabetes education and provide criteria for selecting appropriate theories. METHODS The vision of diabetes education developed at the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center was used to illustrate how our vision has influenced our use of educational and behavioral theories. RESULTS Both our vision and our theoretical assumptions should be articulated, discussed, debated, and studied. CONCLUSIONS Diabetes patient education research can systematically contribute to the development of a sound, coherent, and progressive body of knowledge that will truly serve diabetes patient education.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2636853 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleTheory is the Cart, Vision is the Horse: Reflections on Research in Diabetes Patient Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFamily Medicine and Primary Careen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Department of Medical Education, Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, G1116, Towsley Center, Box 0201, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0201 boba@umich.meden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid10711084en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69155/2/10.1177_014572179902500622.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/014572179902500622en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Diabetes Educatoren_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1. Anderson RM. Is the problem of noncompliance all in our heads?Diabetes Educ. 1985;11:31-34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2. Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Arnold MS, et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17:37-41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3. American Diabetes Association. Report of the Task Force on the Delivery of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy. Diabetes Spectrum. 1999;12: 44-47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4. Anderson RM. Patient empowerment and the traditional medical model: a case of irreconcilable differences?Diabetes Care. 1995;18:412-415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5. Feste C, Anderson RM. Empowerment: from philosophy to practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;26:139-144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference6. Christensen CM. Relationships between pupil achievement, pupil affect-need, teacher warmth, and teacher permissiveness. J Educ Psychol. 1960;51:169-174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference7. Roebuck FN. Cognitive and affective goals of education: towards a clarification plan. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; March, 1980; Atlanta, Ga.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference8. Aspy DN, Roebuck FN. The relationship of teacher-offered conditions of meaning to behaviors described by Flanders' Interaction Analysis. Education 95. 1995;Spring:216-222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference9. Truax CB, Carkhuff RR, Kodman F. Relationships between therapist-offered conditions and patient change in group psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol. 1965;21:327-329.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference10. Truax CB, Wargo DG, Frank JD, et al. Therapist empathy, genuineness, and warmth and patient therapeutic outcome. J Consult Psychol. 1966b;3: 395-401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11. Truax CB. Empathy, warmth, genuineness. Rehabil Rec 7. 1966:10-11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference12. Aspy DN, Roebuck FN. Client centered therapy in the educational process. Proceedings of the European Conference on Client Centered Therapy. Wurtzburg, Germany: University of Wurtzburg Press; 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference13. Dymond RF. A preliminary investigation of the relation of insight and empathy. J Consult Psychol. 1948;12:228-233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference14. Knowles M. Self-Directed Learning. Chicago: Follett; 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference15. Knowles M. The Modem Practice of Adult Education. New York: Cambridge; 1980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference16. Knowles M. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, Tex: Gulf Publishing; 1978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference17. Combs WA, Avila DL, Purkey WW. Helping Relationships. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference18. Mearns D, Thorne B. Person-Centered Counseling in Action. London, UK: Sage Publications; 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference19. Rogers CR. On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference20. Warr PB. An introduction to models in psychological research. In: Chapman AJ, Jones DM, eds. Models of Man. Leicester, England: British Psychological Society; 1980: 291-310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference21. Ryan A. The Philosophy of Social Science. London, UK: Mac Millian, London and Basking Stoke; 1970.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.