Comparative study of the growth processes of GaAs, AlGaAs, InGaAs, and InAlAs lattice matched and nonlattice matched semiconductors using high‐energy electron diffraction
dc.contributor.author | Berger, Paul R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bhattacharya, Pallab K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Singh, Jasprit | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-06T21:36:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-06T21:36:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-04-15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Berger, Paul R.; Bhattacharya, Pallab K.; Singh, Jasprit (1987). "Comparative study of the growth processes of GaAs, AlGaAs, InGaAs, and InAlAs lattice matched and nonlattice matched semiconductors using high‐energy electron diffraction." Journal of Applied Physics 61(8): 2856-2860. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70085> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70085 | |
dc.description.abstract | We have examined the effect of growth temperature and growth interruption time on molecular‐beam‐epitaxial growth of GaAs, Al0.3Ga0.7As, and InxGa1−xAs on GaAs substrates and In0.53Ga0.47As and In0.52Al0.48As on InP substrates using dynamical reflection high‐energy electron diffraction as an in situ probe. We have studied the time taken for a rough growth front to recover in the absence of growth as a function of growth temperature for these compounds. It is found that while GaAs and InGaAs surfaces can recover in 15–20 s under ideal growth conditions, Al0.3Ga0.7As surfaces take ≊45 s, and In0.52Al0.48As surfaces take several minutes to recover. Our results also suggest that smoothening of the growth front occurs by rearrangement of the surface atoms, rather than by re‐evaporation. We have also studied the effect of strain induced by mismatch on growth modes in the case of InxGa1−xAs on GaAs. Our studies suggest that the presence of strain inhibits the surface migration of adatoms during growth and thus tends to generate a rougher growth front. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3102 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 807928 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/octet-stream | |
dc.publisher | The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.rights | © The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative study of the growth processes of GaAs, AlGaAs, InGaAs, and InAlAs lattice matched and nonlattice matched semiconductors using high‐energy electron diffraction | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐2212 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/70085/2/JAPIAU-61-8-2856-1.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1063/1.337880 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Applied Physics | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. M. Van Hove, C. S. Lent, P. R. Pukite, and P. I. Cohen, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 741 (1983). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. H. Neave and B. A. Joyce, Appl. Phys. A 34, 179 (1983). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. H. Neave, P. J. Dobson, B. A. Joyce, and J. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 100 (1985). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Madhukar, T. C. Lee, M. Y. Yen, P. Chen, J. Y. Kim, S. V. Ghaisas, and P. G. Newman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 1148 (1985). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. Singh and K. K. Bajaj, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2, 576 (1984). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. Singh, S. Dudley, and K. K. Bajaj, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 4, 878 (1986). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. R. Arthur, Surf. Sci. 64, 293 (1977). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B. A. Joyce and C. T. Foxon, J. Cryst. Growth 31, 122 (1975). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | F.‐Y. Juang, P. K. Bhattacharya, and J. Singh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 290 (1986). | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Physics, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.