Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Dimethylmercury. I. Cyclopentane Inhibition
dc.contributor.author | Russell, Morley E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bernstein, Richard B. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-06T21:38:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-06T21:38:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1959-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Russell, Morley E.; Bernstein, Richard B. (1959). "Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Dimethylmercury. I. Cyclopentane Inhibition." The Journal of Chemical Physics 30(3): 607-612. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70105> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70105 | |
dc.description.abstract | The kinetics of the pyrolysis of gaseous dimethylmercury have been studied in the presence and absence of cyclopentane inhibitor from 290–375°C for the inhibited and 265–350°C for the uninhibited reactions. The decomposition in excess cyclopentane is first order, with methane the major product (accounting for >95% of the carbon). Rate constants are dependent upon the ratio of dimethylmercury (DMM) to cyclopentane and upon total pressure. The constant for DMM loss is: kD=1.1×1015 exp(—55 900/RT) sec—1. The rate constant (from combined data on DMM loss and CH4 formation) extrapolated to the fully inhibited, high‐pressure limit is: k1=5.0×1015 exp(—57 900/RT) sec—1.The data for the uninhibited decomposition agree with the literature; a partial mechanism is suggested which predicts the transition from chain to nonchain behavior with increasing temperature.For the inhibited reaction the following mechanism is proposed: (1) Hg(CH3)2→HgCH3+CH3, (2) HgCH3→Hg+CH3, (3) CH3+Hg(CH3)2→CH4+CH3HgCH2, (4) CH3+C5H10→CH4+C5H9, (5) CH3+Hg(CH3)2→C2H6+HgCH3, (6) 2 CH3→C2H6, (7) CH3HgCH2→HgCH3+CH2.Using the present value of E1=57.9±1.4 kcal/mole in conjunction with known thermochemical data, E2=0±3 kcal/mole. From the inhibition data, k3/k4=0.7±0.2 at 300°C, with a very small temperature coefficient. The inert gas pressure effect is evidence for the unimolecular nature of step (1). | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3102 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 422340 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.rights | © The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.title | Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Dimethylmercury. I. Cyclopentane Inhibition | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Chemistry Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/70105/2/JCPSA6-30-3-607-1.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1063/1.1730017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The Journal of Chemical Physics | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L. H. Long, Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 673 (1955). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | R. Srinivasan, J. Chem. Phys. 28, 895 (1958). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | For further details, see Ph.D. dissertation, M. E. Russell, University of Michigan (1958), available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. Gilman and R. E. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 52, 3314 (1930). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. S. Gutowsky, J. Chem. Phys. 17, 128 (1949). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The very small fraction of this residue volatile at −127 °C was analyzed mass spectrometrically and found to contain compounds similar to those in a comparable fraction from a decomposition in the absence of cyclopentane. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | K. E. Wilzbach and W. Y. Sykes, Science 120, 494 (1954). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C. M. Laurie and L. H. Long, Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 665 (1955). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tracer experiments, described elsewhere,3 showed that approximately one‐half of this ethane was derived from the cyclopentane carbon atoms and was therefore spurious, so that the proper ratio lies in the range 0.01–0.02. It was also shown by the tracer technique that <2% of the carbon in the methane product originated from the cyclopentane, with >98% derived from the DMM decomposed. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Comparing values for kDkD and kM/2kM∕2 with k1k1 shows only small differences, due to the fact that the corrections for finite Q and 1/P0t1∕P0t are of opposite sign and similar magnitudes. Using no corrections, one obtains nearly the same equation: k1 = 4.5×1015exp(−57 700/RT).k1=4.5×1015exp(−57700∕RT). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | If one includes the next approximation in the series expansion of the term involving the square root in Eq. (1), one obtains the result, kM = 2k1(1+Qk3/k4) [1−4k1k6Q/k42(C5H10)],kM=2k1(1+Qk3∕k4)[1−4k1k6Q∕k42(C5H10)], which explains the negative curvature of the kMkM vs Q (Fig. 3). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. R. McNesby and A. S. Gordon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 825 (1957). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oswin, Rebbert, and Steacie, Can. J. Chem. 33, 472 (1955). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carson, Carson, and Wilmshurst, Nature 170, 320 (1952). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hartley, Pritchard, and Skinner, Trans. Faraday Soc. 46, 1019 (1950). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. O. Pritchard, J. Chem. Phys. 25, 267 (1956). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gowenlock, Polanyi, and Warhurst, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A218, 269 (1953). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Obtained3 by combining data of reference 13 with that of R. Gomer and G. B. Kistiakowsky, J. Chem. Phys. 19, 85 (1951). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | From a two‐point fit of the data of Gomer and Kistiakowsky (see reference 18), i.e., logk3/k5logk3∕k5 vs 1∕T. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gomer and Kistiakowsky (reference 18); also G. B. Kistiakowsky and E. K. Roberts, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1637 (1953). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yeddanapalli, Srinivasan, and Paul, J. Sci. Ind. Research (India) 13B, 232 (1954). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. J. Price and A. F. Trotman‐Dickenson, Trans. Faraday Soc. 53, 939 (1957). These authors noted the strong pressure dependence of the rate constant for the decomposition of DMM in the high‐temperature region. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | N. B. Slater, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 246, 57 (1953); see also A. F. Trotman‐Dickenson, Gas Kinetics (Butterworths Publications, Ltd., London, 1955), p. 63. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Although only limited data on the pressure dependence of k are available, one may estimate n, the effective number of normal vibrations in the Slater theory; then it is possible to make a rough prediction of the difference between the activation energy for the high‐pressure unimolecular constant and the apparent activation energy deduced from low‐pressure rate constants: E0−Ep = nRT/2,E0−Ep=nRT∕2, where E0E0 is the activation energy for the unimolecular rate constant and EpEp is that for the rate constant in the fully bimolecular region. From the present data the ratio P5/P50P5∕P50 (Slater’s notation) is estimated to be (very approximately) 650 mm Hg∕9 mm Hg = 72,Hg=72, which corresponds to n ≅ 11n≅11 [Table 4 of reference 23 (Slater)]. Alternatively, in terms of the shift of a curve of logk/k∞logk∕k∞ vs logP at two temperatures, n = 2Δn=2Δ logP/ΔlogP∕Δ logT. From a plot of 1∕k vs 1∕P for the data at 816 °K (reference 22, Fig. 1) k∞ ≅ 1.5sec−1;k∞≅1.5sec−1; from this a plot of logk/k∞logk∕k∞ vs logP may be constructed and compared with a similar one for the present data (632 °K). After extrapolation to allow overlap, a shift corresponding to n ≅ 10n≅10 is noted. [A third estimate of n based on the magnitude of k/k = In(θ)k∕k=In(θ) using Slater’s23 relation for θ∕P his Table 3, requires more information than available. The factors except fnfn are known; unfortunately the high pre‐exponential factor gives rise to a very atypical value of θ∕P and the results are unsatisfactory.] Choosing n = 10n=10 as a minimum estimate, E0−Ep ≥ 8E0−Ep⩾8 kcal∕mole near 800 °K. Since Price and Trotman‐Dickenson22 used as their standard pressure a value (16 mm Hg) where the slope of the log‐log plot corresponded to an order of ca 1.5, the difference in activation energy would of course be smaller than this value (and probably somewhat smaller than the 7 kcal∕mole discrepancy sought). | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Physics, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.