Show simple item record

Measurements of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear polarizabilities for HF and HCl

dc.contributor.authorDudley, J. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWard, J. F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T22:34:24Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T22:34:24Z
dc.date.issued1985-05-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationDudley, J. W.; Ward, J. F. (1985). "Measurements of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear polarizabilities for HF and HCl." The Journal of Chemical Physics 82(10): 4673-4677. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70699>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70699
dc.description.abstractMeasurements of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear polarizabilities (hyperpolarizabilities) for HF and HCl using dc electric‐field‐induced second‐harmonic generation are presented: χ(3)∥(HF)=70(10)×10−39 esu/mol, χ(2)∥ (HF)=−4.70(41)×10−32 esu/mol, χ(3)∥(HCl)= 347(15)×10−39 esu/mol, χ(2)∥(HCl)= −4.22(50)×10−32 esu/mol. In the case of HF this allows a critical comparison with theory. HF has fewer electrons than any polar molecule previously studied experimentally and the small size of HF has made it an attractive candidate for theoretical investigation. Christiansen and McCullough have used numerical Hartree–Fock techniques to establish generally accepted criteria for basis set selection; and Bartlett and Purvis have applied to HF the most elaborate technique applied so far to the calculation of any molecular hyperpolarizability (CHF SDQ‐MBPT[4]). Experimental corrections and uncertainties are carefully considered as are several other factors relevant to a comparison of these experimental and theoretical data. The theoretical results are about a factor of 2 smaller than the experimental data and none of the factors considered seems to offer a resolution of this discrepancy.en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent452099 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleMeasurements of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear polarizabilities for HF and HClen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRandall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/70699/2/JCPSA6-82-10-4673-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.448726en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Chemical Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFor a review, see M. P. Bogaard and B. J. Orr, International Review of Science: Physical Chemistry, edited by A. D. Buckingham (Butter‐worths, London, 1975), Ser. 2, Vol. 2, pp. 149–194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. J. Bartlett and G. D. Purvis III, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1313 (1979).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. F. Ward and I. J. Bigio, Phys. Rev. 11, 60 (1975).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. K. Miller and J. F. Ward, Phys. Rev. A 16, 1179 (1977).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. F. Ward and C. K. Miller, Phys. Rev. A 19, 826 (1979).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. F. Ward and G. H. C. New, Phys. Rev. 185, 57 (1969); B. J. Orr and J. F. Ward, Mol. Phys. 20, 513 (1971).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. J. Bigio, R. S. Finn, and J. F. Ward, Appl. Opt. 14, 336 (1975).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Sitz and R. Yaris, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 3546 (1968).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. D. Buckingham and D. A. Dunmur, Trans. Faraday Soc. 64, 1776 (1968).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. S. Finn and J. F. Ward, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 454 (1974).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. S. Finn and J. F. Ward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 285 (1971).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. S. Finn and J. F. Ward, Appl. Opt. 11, 2103 (1972); J. F. Ward and D. S. Elliott, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 5438 (1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. D. Nelson, D. R. Lide, and A. A. Maryott, Selected Values of Electric Dipole Moments for Molecules in the Gas Phase, NSRDSNBS 10 (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1967).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. N. Maclean, F. J. C. Rossotti, and H. S. Rossotti, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 24, 1549 (1962).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. H. Dymond and E. B. Smith, The Virial Coefficients of Pure Gases and Mixtures (Oxford University, Oxford, 1980).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandolt‐Bornstein, Zahlenwerte und Funktionen (Springer, Berlin, 1962), II Band, 8 Teil, p. 6–879.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. J. Perkins, J. Phys. Chem. 68, 654 (1964).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. D. Buckingham and B. J. Orr, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 305, 259 (1968).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJANAF Thermochemical Tables, 2nd Ed., D. R. Stull and H. Prophet, project directors, Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. Natl. Bur. Stand, NSRDSNBS37 (U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C., 1971).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. E. Barton and B. J. Howard, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 73, 45 (1982).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. D. McLean and M. Yoshimine, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3682 (1967); S. P. Liebmann and J. W. Moskowitz, 54, 3622 (1971).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. M. O’Hare and R. P. Hurst, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 2356 (1967).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. D. McLean and M. Yoshimine, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 3256 (1967).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. P. Arrighini, M. Maestro, and R. Moccia, Symp. Faraday Soc. 2, 48 (1968); G. P. Lazzeretti and R. Zanasi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 39, 323 (1976); P. Lazzeretti and R. Zanasi, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 1523 (1978); P. Lazzeretti and R. Zanasi, 74, 5216 (1981).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. E. Raidy and D. P. Santry, Chem. Phys. Lett. 53, 568 (1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. A. Christiansen and E. A. McCullough, Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 63, 570 (1979).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. M. Bishop and L. M. Cheung, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1310 (1979); R. D. Amos, Mol. Phys. 38, 33 (1979).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. D. Purvis III and R. J. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. A 23, 1594 (1981).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. E. Raidy and D. P. Santry, Chem. Phys. Lett. 61, 473 (1979); R. S. Watts and A. T. Stelbovics, 61, 351 (1979).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.‐J. Werner and W. Meyer, Mol. Phys. 31, 855 (1976).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. A. Christiansen and E. A. McCullough, Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 51, 468 (1977).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. A. Gianturco and C. Guidotti, J. Phys. B 11, L385 (1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. D. Amos, Mol. Phys. 35, 1765 (1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.‐J. Werner and P. Rosmus, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 2319 (1980).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. A. Christiansen and E. A. McCullough, Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 55, 439 (1978).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWe use the notation β and γ here rather than χ⪷(2)χ⪷(2) and χ⪷(3)χ⪷(3) to emphasize conventional differences in definitions. The relationships are made explicit in Eqs. (11) and (12).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. J. Bartlett (private communication).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. D. Buckingham, Adv. Chem. Phys. 12, 107 (1967). (a) Added in proof. The SDQ‐MBPT(4) value of γyyyyγyyyy is now available (private communication, R. J. Bartlett). Using this value in place of Eq. (12) increases χ⪷(3)χ⪷(3) (see Table II) from 35×10−3935×10−39 to 39×10−3939×10−39 esu. Our conclusions remain unchanged.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. S. Finn, Thesis, (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) (1971).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. J. Orr, Nonlinear Behaviour of Molecules, Atoms and Ions in Electric Magnetic or Electromagnetic Fields, edited by L. Neel (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 227; D. M. Bishop, Mol. Phys. 42, 1219 (1981).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. S. Elliott and J. F. Ward, Mol. Phys. 51, 45 (1984).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. H. F. Diercksen, V. Kellö, and A. J. Sadlej, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 2918 (1983); G. H. F. Diercksen, V. Kellö, and A. J. Sadlej, Chem. Phys. Lett. 95, 226 (1983).en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.