Analysis of laser absorption on a rough metal surface
dc.contributor.author | Ang, L. K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Y. Y. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gilgenbach, Ronald M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Spindler, H. L. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-06T23:30:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-06T23:30:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997-02-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ang, L. K.; Lau, Y. Y.; Gilgenbach, R. M.; Spindler, H. L. (1997). "Analysis of laser absorption on a rough metal surface." Applied Physics Letters 70(6): 696-698. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71289> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71289 | |
dc.description.abstract | We have developed a simple model to estimate the cumulative absorption coefficient of an ultraviolet laser pulse impinging on a pure metal, including the effects of surface roughness whose scale is much larger than the laser wavelength λ. The multiple reflections from the rough surface may increase the absorption coefficient over a pristine, flat surface by an order of magnitude. Thus, as much as 16% (at room temperature) of the power of a 248 nm KrF excimer laser pulse may be absorbed by an aluminum target. A comparison with experimental data is given. © 1997 American Institute of Physics. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3102 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 94145 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.rights | © The American Institute of Physics | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis of laser absorption on a rough metal surface | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, Intense Energy Beam Interaction Laboratory, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2104 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71289/2/APPLAB-70-6-696-1.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1063/1.118242 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Applied Physics Letters | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. L. Spindler, R. M. Gilgenbach, and J. S. Lash, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLABAIP68, 3245 (1996). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. I. Anisimov and V. A. Khokhlov, Instabilities in Laser-Matter Interaction (Chemical Rubber, Boca Raton, 1995). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Peterlongo, A. Miotello, and R. Kelley, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8AIP50, 4716 (1994). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. F. Young, J. E. Sipe, and H. M. van Driel, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDOAIP30, 2001 (1984). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H. M. van Driel, J. E. Sipe, and J. F. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAOAIP49, 1955 (1982). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. E. Sipe, J. F. Young, J. S. Preston, and H. M. van Driel, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDOAIP27, 1141 (1983). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. R. J. Brueck and D. J. Ehrlich, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAOAIP48, 1678 (1982). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | F. Keilmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAOAIP51, 2097 (1983). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Poueyo-Verwaerde, R. Fabbro, G. Deshors, A. M. de Frutos, and J. M. Orza, J. Appl. Phys. JAPIAUAIP74, 5773 (1993). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | See, e.g., M. A. Lieberman and A. J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing (Wiley, New York, 1994); R. P. Feynman, Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964), Vol. 2, pp. 32-10. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | See, e.g., Chap. 10 in C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1976). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | If instead we calculate ωpωp by assuming that there is one free electron for each aluminum atom, as done in Feynamn [Ref. 10], we arrive at a similar value of ωp/ω = 1.82.ωp/ω=1.82. Feynman, in addition, suggested a method to evaluate Δ, with the result being given in Eq. (2) following his procedure. More serious are the effects of oxide layer and of polycrystallinity in the metal in the evaluation of Δ and ωp.ωp. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | See, e.g., Chap. 7.3 in J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1990). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J. F. Young, J. S. Preston, H. M. van Driel, and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDOAIP27, 1155 (1983). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. M. Bonch-Bruevich, Y. A. Imas, G. S. Romanov, M. N. Libenson, and L. N. Mal’tsev, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. SPTPA3INS13, 640 (1968). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | T. E. Zavecz and M. A. Saifi, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLABAIP26, 165 (1975). | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Physics, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.