WHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED?
dc.contributor.author | Knowles, L. Lacey | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T18:50:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T18:50:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Knowles, L. Lacey (2008). "WHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED?." Evolution 62(11): 2713-2717. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72042> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0014-3820 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1558-5646 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72042 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18973487&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 130702 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | Journal compilation © 2008 The Society for the Study of Evolution | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Biogeography | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Demographic History | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Historical Inference | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nested-clade Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Phylogeography | en_US |
dc.title | WHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | E-mail: knowlesl@umich.edu | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18973487 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72042/1/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Evolution | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beaumont, M. A., and M. Panchal. 2008. On the validity of nested clade phylogeographical analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17: 2563 – 2565. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Excoffier, L., and G. Heckel. 2006. Computer programs for population genetics data analysis: a survival guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 745 – 58. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Garrick, R. C., R. J. Dyer, L. B. Beheregaray, and P. Sunnucks. 2008. Babies and bathwater: a comment on the premature obituary for nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1401 – 1403. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Knowles, L. L., and W. P. Maddison. 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2623 – 2635. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McCormack, J. E., H. Huang, and L. L. Knowles. 2009. Sky islands. In R. Gillespie and D. Clague, eds. Encyclopedia of Islands. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. In press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Panchal, M. 2007. The automation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 509 – 510. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Panchal, M., M. A. Beaumont. 2007. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution 61: 1466 – 1480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Petit, R. J. 2008. The coup de grÂce for nested clade phylogeographic analysis? Mol. Ecol. 17: 516 – 518. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Petit, R. J., and D. Grivet. 2002. Optimal randomization strategies when testing the existence of a phylogeographic structure. Genetics 161: 469 – 471. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. Freeman and Co., New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Templeton, A. R. 2004. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol. Ecol. 13: 789 – 809. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Templeton, A. R. 2008. Nested clade analysis: extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1877 – 1880. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.