View Item 

Show simple item record

WHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED?

dc.contributor.authorKnowles, L. Laceyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:50:54Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:50:54Z
dc.date.issued2008-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationKnowles, L. Lacey (2008). "WHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED?." Evolution 62(11): 2713-2717. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72042>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0014-3820en_US
dc.identifier.issn1558-5646en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72042
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18973487&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent130702 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2008 The Society for the Study of Evolutionen_US
dc.subject.otherBiogeographyen_US
dc.subject.otherDemographic Historyen_US
dc.subject.otherHistorical Inferenceen_US
dc.subject.otherNested-clade Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherPhylogeographyen_US
dc.titleWHY DOES A METHOD THAT FAILS CONTINUE TO BE USED?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail: knowlesl@umich.eduen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18973487en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72042/1/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaumont, M. A., and M. Panchal. 2008. On the validity of nested clade phylogeographical analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17: 2563 – 2565.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceExcoffier, L., and G. Heckel. 2006. Computer programs for population genetics data analysis: a survival guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 745 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrick, R. C., R. J. Dyer, L. B. Beheregaray, and P. Sunnucks. 2008. Babies and bathwater: a comment on the premature obituary for nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1401 – 1403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles, L. L., and W. P. Maddison. 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2623 – 2635.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCormack, J. E., H. Huang, and L. L. Knowles. 2009. Sky islands. In R. Gillespie and D. Clague, eds. Encyclopedia of Islands. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanchal, M. 2007. The automation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 509 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanchal, M., M. A. Beaumont. 2007. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution 61: 1466 – 1480en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetit, R. J. 2008. The coup de grÂce for nested clade phylogeographic analysis? Mol. Ecol. 17: 516 – 518.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetit, R. J., and D. Grivet. 2002. Optimal randomization strategies when testing the existence of a phylogeographic structure. Genetics 161: 469 – 471.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. Freeman and Co., New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempleton, A. R. 2004. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol. Ecol. 13: 789 – 809.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempleton, A. R. 2008. Nested clade analysis: extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1877 – 1880.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x.pdf
Size:
127.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.