Show simple item record

What Effect Does Increasing Inpatient Time Have on Outpatient-oriented Internist Satisfaction?

dc.contributor.authorSaint, Sanjayen_US
dc.contributor.authorZemencuk, Judith K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Rodney A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGolin, Carol E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKonrad, Thomas R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLinzer, Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:50:57Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2003-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationSaint, Sanjay; Zemencuk, Judith K.; Hayward, Rodney A.; Golin, Carol E.; Konrad, Thomas R.; Linzer, Mark (2003). "What Effect Does Increasing Inpatient Time Have on Outpatient-oriented Internist Satisfaction?." Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(9): 725-729. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72043>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72043
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12950481&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBecause career satisfaction among general internists is relatively low, we sought to understand the impact on satisfaction of general internists managing patients both in and outside of the hospital. Using data from a national survey, we asked, “Among outpatient-oriented general internists (i.e., internists who spend less than 50% of their clinical time caring for inpatients), what effect does time spent in the hospital have on physician satisfaction, stress, and burnout?” DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The Physician Worklife Study, in which 5,704 physicians in primary and specialty nonsurgical care selected from the American Medical Association's Masterfile were surveyed (adjusted response rate = 52%), was used. Our analyses focused on clinically active outpatient-oriented general internists ( N = 339). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We constructed multivariate linear models to test for statistically significant associations between the amount of time spent seeing inpatients and physician satisfaction as measured by several satisfaction scales. Even after controlling for total hours worked and other possible confounding variables, we found that increased time working in the hospital was significantly associated with decreases in satisfaction with administration, specialty, autonomy, and personal time, and significantly associated with an increase in life stress. There was also a significant association between increased time spent in the hospital and burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings imply that there may be a tension between the practice of inpatient and outpatient medicine by general internists, and suggest that fewer hospital duties may increase career satisfaction for outpatient-oriented internists. Although additional studies are warranted in order to better understand why these relationships exist, our data suggest that the hospitalist model of inpatient care might be one approach to alleviate stress and improve satisfaction for many general internists.en_US
dc.format.extent88664 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2003 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherJob Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherHospitalistsen_US
dc.subject.otherBurnouten_US
dc.subject.otherProfessionalen_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary Health Careen_US
dc.subject.otherProfessional Practiceen_US
dc.titleWhat Effect Does Increasing Inpatient Time Have on Outpatient-oriented Internist Satisfaction?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReceived from the Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Ann Arbor VA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research (SS, JKZ, RAH), and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School (SS, RAH), Ann Arbor, Mich; the Department of Medicine and Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of North Carolina Schools of Medicine and Public Health (CEG), and the Division of Health Professions and Primary Care, Sheps Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine (TRK), Chapel Hill, NC; and the Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Medicine (ML), Madison, Wis.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12950481en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72043/1/j.1525-1497.2003.20637.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20637.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaint S, Konrad TR, Golin CE, Welsh DE, Linzer M. Characteristics of general internists who practice only outpatient medicine: results from the Physician Worklife Study. Seminars in Medical Practice. 2002; 5: 5 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWachter RM, Goldman L. The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American health care system. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 514 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002; 287: 487 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryant DC. Hospitalists and ‘officists’ preparing for the future of general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14: 182 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15: 441 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWetterneck TB, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Worklife and satisfaction of general internists. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 649 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinzer M, Gerrity M, Douglas JA, McMurray JE, Williams ES, Konrad TR. Physician stress: results from the Physician Worklife Study. Stress Health. 2002; 18: 37 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadison DL, Konrad TR. Large medical group-practice organizations and employed physicians: a relationship in transition. Milbank Q. 1988; 66: 240 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenstein R. Measuring the job satisfaction of physicians in organized settings. Med Care. 1984; 22: 56 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMurray JE, Williams E, Schwartz MD, et al. Physician job satisfaction: developing a model using qualitative data. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 711 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999; 37: 1174 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999; 37: 1140 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24: 385 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmoldt RA, Freeborn DK, Klevit HD. Physician burnout: recommendations for HMO managers. HMO Pract. 1994; 8: 58 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinzer M, Visser MR, Oort FJ, et al. Predicting and preventing physician burnout: results from the United States and the Netherlands. Am J Med. 2001; 111: 170 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLessler JT, Kalsbeek WD. Nonsampling Error in Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1992: 172 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomz M, Wittenberg J, King G. Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results, Version 1.2. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandez A, Grumbach K, Goitein L, Vranizan K, Osmond DH, Bindman AB. Friend or foe? How primary care physicians perceive hospitalists. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 2902 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 1129 – 36.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.