View Item 

Show simple item record

Host specificity and multivariate diagnostics of cryptic species in predacious cheyletid mites of the genus Cheletophyes (Acari: Cheyletidae) associated with large carpenter bees

dc.contributor.authorKlimov, Pavel B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBochkov, Andre V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Barry M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:23:45Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2006-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationKLIMOV, PAVEL B.; BOCHKOV, ANDRE V.; OCONNOR, BARRY M. (2006). "Host specificity and multivariate diagnostics of cryptic species in predacious cheyletid mites of the genus Cheletophyes (Acari: Cheyletidae) associated with large carpenter bees." Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 87(1): 45-58. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72537>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0024-4066en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8312en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72537
dc.format.extent570784 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights2006 The Linnean Society of Londonen_US
dc.subject.otherAcarinariumen_US
dc.subject.otherApidaeen_US
dc.subject.otherCanonical Variates Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherLogistic Regression Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherXylocopa Nigritaen_US
dc.subject.otherXylocopa Torridaen_US
dc.titleHost specificity and multivariate diagnostics of cryptic species in predacious cheyletid mites of the genus Cheletophyes (Acari: Cheyletidae) associated with large carpenter beesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Museum of Zoology, 1109 Geddes Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109–1079, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherZoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya embankment 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russiaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72537/1/j.1095-8312.2006.00554.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00554.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiological Journal of the Linnean Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurks RA, Heraty JM. 2002. Morphometric analysis of four species of Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) attacking codling moth and other tortricid pests in North America. Journal of Hymenopteran Research 11: 167 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaceres-Martinez J, del Rio-Portilla MA, Curiel-Ramirez Gutierrez S, Gomez H, Ignacio M. 2003. Phenotypes of the California mussel, Mytilus californianus, Conrad (1837). Journal of Shellfish Research 22: 135 – 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaridge MF, Gillham MC. 1992. Variation in population of leafhoppers and planthoppers (Auchenorrhyncha): biotypes and biological species. In: Sorensen JT, Foottit R, eds. Ordination in the study of morphology, evolution and systematics of insects: applications and quantitative genetic rationales. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 241 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarroch JN, Mosimann JE. 1985. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 72: 241 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeMartini EE, Lau BB. 1999. Morphometric criteria for estimating sexual maturity in two snappers, Etelis carbunculus and Pristipomoides sieboldii. Fishery Bulletin (Seattle) 97: 449 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEickwort GC. 1994. Evolution and life-history patterns of mites assciated with bees. In: Houck MA, ed. Mites: ecological and evolutionary patterns. New York: Chapman & Hall, 218 – 251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFain A. 1979. Idiosomal and leg chaetotaxy in the Cheyletidae. International Journal of Acarology 5: 305 – 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFain A, Bochkov AV. 2001a. A review of some genera of cheyletid mites (Acari: Prostigmata) with descriptions of new species. Acarina 9: 47 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFain A, Bochkov AV. 2001b. A review of the genus Cheyletus Latreille, 1776 (Acari: Cheyletidae). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie 71: 83 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerling D, Velthuis HHW, Hefetz A. 1989. Bionomics of the large carpenter bees of the genus Xylocopa. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 163 – 190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerson U, Fain A, Smiley RL. 1999. Further observations of the Cheyletidae (Acari), with a key to the genera of the Cheyletinae and a list of all known species of the family. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie 69: 35 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroger J. 2000. Separation of two herring stocks in the transition zone between Baltic and North Sea, based on logistic regression and meristic characters. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research 48: 161 – 174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHair JF, Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaitlinger R. 2000. Cheletophyes aurorae n. sp. (Acari: Prostigmata: Cheyletidae) from Xylocopinae (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) in Tanzania. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej We Wroclawiu Zootechnika 47 ( 400 ): 85 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouck M, OConnor BM. 1998. Morphological variation in Hemisarcoptes (Acari: Hemisarcoptidae): application of multivariate morphometric analyses. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 335 – 349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuberty C. 1994. Applied discriminant analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen DH. 1980. When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611 – 612.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJungers WL, Falsetti AB, Wall CE. 1995. Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 38: 137 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlimov PB, Lekveishvili M, Dowling APG, OConnor BM. 2004. Multivariate analysis of morphological variation in two cryptic species of Sancassania (Acari: Acaridae) from Costa Rica. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 322 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLance R, Kennedy ML, Leberg P. 2000. Classification bias in discriminant function analyses used to evaluate putatively different taxa. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 245 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeys R, Cooper SJB, Schwarz MP. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the large carpenter bees, genus Xylocopa (Hymenoptera: Apidae), based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 407 – 418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeys R, Cooper SJB, Schwarz MP. 2002. Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the large carpenter bees, genus Xylocopa (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 249 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMenard S. 2001. Applied logistic regression. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage, 7 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichener CD. 2000. The bees of the world. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinckley RL. 1998. A cladistic analysis and classification of the subgenera and genera of the large carpenter bees, Tribe Xylocopini (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Scientific Papers of the Natural History Museum, the University of Kansas 9: 1 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOConnor BM. 1993. The mite community associated with Xylocopa latipes (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae: Xylocopinae) with description of a new type of acarinarium. International Journal of Acarolology 19: 159 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOConnor BM, Houck MA. 1991. Preparation of mite specimens. In: Rosen D, ed. Armored scale insects, their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. B. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Science Publishers, 243 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodriguero MS, Vilardi JC, Vera MT, Cayol JP, Rial E. 2002. Morphometric traits and sexual selection in medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) under field cage conditions. Florida Entomologist 85: 143 – 149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheurer JA, Bestgen KR, Fausch KD. 2003. Resolving taxonomy and historic distribution for conservation of rare great plains fishes: Hybognathus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in eastern Colorado basins. Copeia 1: 1 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShereef GW, El-Duweini FK. 1980. Biological observations on three species of cheyletid mites with description of immature stages of Cheletophyes eckerti Summers and Price. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Plant Protection Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt 3: 219 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmons T, Falsetti AB, Smith FH. 1991. Frontal bone morphometrics of southwest Asian Pleistocene hominids. Journal of Human Evolution 20: 249 – 269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSummers FM, Price DW. 1970. Review of the mite family Cheyletidae. University of California Publications in Entomology 61: 1 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUmphrey GJ. 1996. Morphometric discrimination among sibling species in the fulva – rudis – texana complex of the ant genus Aphaenogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 528 – 559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVitzthum H. 1920. Acarologische Beobachtungen (2 Reiche). Archiv fÜr Naturgeschichte 84: 1 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolgin VI. 1969. Kleshchi Semeystva Cheyletidae Mirovoy Faun (Mites of the Family Cheyletidae of the World). Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1095-8312.2006.00554.x.pdf
Size:
557.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.