View Item 

Show simple item record

Pregnant, Donor Oocyte Recipient Women Describe Their Lived Experience of Establishing the “Family Lexicon”

dc.contributor.authorHershberger, Patricia E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:47:44Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:47:44Z
dc.date.issued2007-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationHershberger, Patricia E. (2007). "Pregnant, Donor Oocyte Recipient Women Describe Their Lived Experience of Establishing the “Family Lexicon”." Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 36(2): 161-167. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72928>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-2175en_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-6909en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72928
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17371517&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent107279 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007, AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nursesen_US
dc.subject.otherAssisted Reproductionen_US
dc.subject.otherInfertilityen_US
dc.subject.otherOocyte Donationen_US
dc.subject.otherPhenomenologyen_US
dc.subject.otherQualitative Researchen_US
dc.titlePregnant, Donor Oocyte Recipient Women Describe Their Lived Experience of Establishing the “Family Lexicon”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPatricia E. Hershberger, PhD, APRN, BC, FNP, is a postdoctoral research fellow at the School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17371517en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72928/1/j.1552-6909.2007.00128.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00128.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhuja, K. K., Mostyn, B. J., & Simons, E. G. ( 1997 ). Egg sharing and egg donation: Attitudes of British egg donors and recipients. Human Reproduction, 12, 2845 - 2852.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApplegarth, L., Goldberg, N. C., Cholst, I., McGoff, N., Fantini, D., Zellers, N, et al. ( 1995 ). Families created through ovum donation: A preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12, 574 - 580.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaetens, P., Devroey, P., Camus, M., Van Steirteghem, A. C., & Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. ( 2000 ). Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: The decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Human Reproduction, 15, 476 - 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeck, C. T. ( 1994 ). Reliability and validity issues in phenomenological research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 16, 254 - 267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 1997 ). 1995 assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. ( 2005 ). 2003 assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColaizzi, P. F. ( 1978 ). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King ( Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology ( pp. 48 - 71 ). New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCowles, K. V. ( 1988 ). Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 163 - 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Health. ( 2004 ). Anonymity to be removed from future sperm, egg and embryo donors (reference no. 2004/0023). Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEthics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. ( 2004 ). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertility and Sterility, 82, S212 - S216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenfeld, D. A., Greenfeld, D. G., Mazure, C. M., Keefe, D. L., & Olive, D. L. ( 1998 ). Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation? Fertility and Sterility, 70, 1009 - 1014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenfeld, D. A., & Klock, S. C. ( 2004 ). Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1565 - 1571.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn, S. J., & Craft-Rosenberg, M. ( 2002 ). The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 283 - 293.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHershberger, P. ( 2004 ). Recipients of oocyte donation: An integrative review. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 33, 610 - 621.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHershberger, P., Klock, S. C., & Barnes, R. B. ( in press ). Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: A phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman, D. L., Zellman, G. L., Fair, C. C., Mayer, J. F., Zeitz, J. G., Gibbons, W. E, et al. ( 2003 ). Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertility and Sterility, 79, 1063 - 1069.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHusserl, E. ( 1962 ). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W.R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). New York: Collier-Macmillan. (Original translation published 1931)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M., Ozgur, K., Donmez, L., & Stones-Abbasi, A. ( 2006 ). Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: First data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction, 21, 318 - 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKavanaugh, K., & Ayres, L. ( 1998 ). “Not as bad as it could have been”: Assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 91 - 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKearney, M. H. ( 2001 ). Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 145 - 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkland, A., Power, M., Burton, G., Baber, R., Studd, J., & Abdalla, H. ( 1992 ). Comparison of attitudes of donors and recipients to oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 7, 355 - 357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlock, S. C., & Greenfeld, D. A. ( 2004 ). Parents’ knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 19, 1575 - 1579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindheim, S. R., Kavic, S., & Sauer, M. V. ( 2000 ). Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: A comparison between gamete donors and their recipients. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17, 127 - 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, C., & Golombok, S. ( 2003 ). To tell or not to tell: The decision-making process of egg-donation parents. Human Fertility, 6, 89 - 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNachtigall, R. D., Becker, G., Friese, C., Butler, A., & MacDougall, K. ( 2005 ). Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 431 - 434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePettee, D., & Weckstein, L. N. ( 1993 ). A survey of parental attitudes toward oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 8, 1963 - 1965.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePractice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. ( 2006 ). Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertility and Sterility, 86 ( Suppl. 5 ), S51 - S52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePresident’s Council on Bioethics. ( 2004 ). Reproduction and responsibility: The regulation of new biotechnologies. Washington, DC: Author.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabinerson, D., Dekel, A., Orvieto, R., Feldberg, D., Simon, D., & Kaplan, B. ( 2002 ). Subsidised oocyte donation in Israel (1998-2000): Results, costs and lessons. Human Reproduction, 17, 1404 - 1406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchenker, J. G. ( 1997 ). Assisted reproduction practice in Europe: Legal and ethical aspects. Human Reproduction Update, 3, 173 - 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel, J. M. ( 1998 ). Pathways to single motherhood: Sexual intercourse, adoption, and donor insemination. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79, 75 - 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSÖderstrÖm-Anttila, V. ( 2001 ). Pregnancy and child outcome after oocyte donation. Human Reproduction Update, 7, 28 - 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorrell, J. M., & Redmond, G. M. ( 1995 ). Interviews in qualitative nursing research: Differing approaches for ethnographic and phenomenological studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 1117 - 1122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiegelberg, H. ( 1975 ). Doing phenomenology. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan den Akker, O. ( 2006 ). A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions. Human Reproduction Update, 12, 91 - 101.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1552-6909.2007.00128.x.pdf
Size:
104.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.