Show simple item record

Timing of Supplemental Feeding for Tilapia Production

dc.contributor.authorDiana, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, C. Kweien_US
dc.contributor.authorYi, Yangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:59:05Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:59:05Z
dc.date.issued1996-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiana, James S.; Lin, C. Kwei; Yi, Yang (1996). "Timing of Supplemental Feeding for Tilapia Production." Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 27(4): 410-419. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73113>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0893-8849en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-7345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73113
dc.description.abstractThe staged addition of feed to fertilized fish ponds was evaluated by adding fertilizers to 15 ponds stocked with Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus , then adding feed at half ad libitum rates once fish in the ponds reached a target weight. Each pond was stocked with 750 fish (3 fish/m 2 ), and each treatment included three ponds with first feeding at (a) 50 g, (b) 100 g, (c) 150 g, (d) 200 g, and (e) 250 g. Ponds in Thailand (at the Ayutthaya Freshwater Fisheries Station, Royal Thai Department of Fisheries) were maintained for 236–328 d until the fish reached 500 g. Growth was similar for all treatments under fertilizer alone (1.17 g/d) and was also similar when feed was applied (3.1 g/d). Feed application rates averaged 1.17% BW/d, indicating substantial use of natural food. Pond water quality did not deteriorate under supplemental feeding. Feed conversion rates averaged 1.03. Multiple regression indicated that 73.8% of the variance in growth was explained by design variables (feed input and days), while 86.2% of the variance in growth was explained by adding dissolved oxygen content and alkalinity into the equation. The most efficient system was to grow fish to 100–150 g with fertilizers alone, then add feed. First adding feed (at 50% ad libitum) once fish reached 100 g produced the highest predicted annual revenues ($6,164 per hectare). Results of this experiment indicated that either critical standing crop occurred early (before the first fish sample) or did not occur at all in these ponds.en_US
dc.format.extent649590 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1996 the World Aquaculture Societyen_US
dc.titleTiming of Supplemental Feeding for Tilapia Productionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1115 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAsian Institute of Technology, G.P.O. Box 2754, Bangkok 10501 Thailanden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73113/1/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00625.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00625.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the World Aquaculture Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAPHA (American Public Health Association). 1980. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, fifteenth edition. Washington, D.C..en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolte, J., S. Nath and D. Ernst 1996. Pond version 3.0. Department of Bioresource Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiana, J. S., D. D. Dettweiler and C. K. Lin 1991a. Effect of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloricus) on the ecosystem of aquaculture ponds, and its significance to the trophic cascade' hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 183 – 190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiana, J. S., C. K. Lin and P. J. Schneeberger 1991b. Relationships among nutrient inputs, water nutrient concentrations, primary production, and yield of Oreochromis niloticus in ponds. Aquaculture 92: 323 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiana, J. S., C. K. Lin and K. Jaiyen 1994. Supplemental feeding of tilapia in fertilized ponds. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 25: 497 – 506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgna, H. S., N. Brown and M. Leslie 1987. General reference: Site descriptions, material and methods for the global experiment. Pond dynamics/Aquaculture collaborative research data reports, volume 1. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, B. W. 1992. Substitution of organic manure for pelleted feed in tilapia production. Aquaculture 101: 213 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall, C. A. S. and R. Moll 1975. Methods of assessing aquatic primary productivity. Pages 19 – 53 in H. Leith and R. H. Whittaker Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHepher, B. 1978. Ecological aspects of warm-water fish pond management. Pages 447 – 468 in S. D. Gerking Ecology of fish production. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnud-Hansen, C. F., C. D. McNabb and T. R. Batterson 1991. Application of limnology for efficient nutrient utilization in tropical pond aquaculture. Proceedings of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnologists 24: 2,541 – 2,543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiedrahita, R. H. 1988. Introduction to computer modeling of aquaculture pond ecosystems. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 19: 1 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePillay, T. V. R. 1993. Aquaculture: Principles and practices. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc..en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZonneveld, N. and R Fadholi 1991. Feed intake and growth of red tilapia at different stocking densities in ponds in Indonesia. Aquaculture 99: 83 – 94.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.