Show simple item record

A National Survey of Physician Practices Regarding Influenza Vaccine

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Matthew M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMc Mahon, Shawn R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantoli, Jeanne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Benjaminen_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Sarah J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:01:49Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2002-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Matthew M.; Mc Mahon, Shawn R.; Santoli, Jeanne M.; Schwartz, Benjamin; Clark, Sarah J. (2002). "A National Survey of Physician Practices Regarding Influenza Vaccine." Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(9): 670-676. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73157>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73157
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12220362&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo characterize U.S. physicians' practices regarding influenza vaccine, particularly regarding the capacity to identify high-risk patients, the use of reminder systems, and the typical period of administration of vaccine. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey administered in October and November 2000. PARTICIPANTS: National random sample of internists and family physicians ( N = 1,606). RESULTS: Response rate was 60%. Family physicians are significantly more likely than internists to administer influenza vaccine in their practices (82% vs 76%; P < .05). Eighty percent of physicians typically administer influenza vaccine for 3 to 5 months, but only 27% continue administering vaccine after the typical national peak of influenza activity. Only one half of physicians said their practices are able to generate lists of patients with chronic illnesses at high risk for complications of influenza, and only one quarter had used mail or telephone reminder systems to contact high-risk patients. Physicians working in a physician network (including managed care organizations) are more than twice as likely to use reminders as physicians in other practice settings (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 3.55). CONCLUSIONS: Over three quarters of U.S. internists and family physicians routinely administer influenza vaccine, but few continue immunization efforts past the typical national peak of influenza activity. Many physicians may be limited by their practice data systems' capacity to identify high-risk patients. Despite the known effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reminder systems, few physicians use reminders for influenza vaccination efforts. These findings raise concerns about meeting domestic influenza vaccination goals—especially for individuals with chronic illness and during periods of delayed vaccine availability—and the possibility of increased morbidity and mortality attributable to influenza as a result.en_US
dc.format.extent104764 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2002 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherInfluenza Vaccineen_US
dc.subject.otherRemindersen_US
dc.subject.otherChronic Illnessen_US
dc.subject.otherGeneral Internisten_US
dc.subject.otherFamily Physicianen_US
dc.subject.otherGeriatricianen_US
dc.titleA National Survey of Physician Practices Regarding Influenza Vaccineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReceived from the Division of General Internal Medicine (MMD) and Division of General Pediatrics (MMD, SJC), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (SRM, JMS, BS), Atlanta, Ga.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12220362en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73157/1/j.1525-1497.2002.11040.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11040.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 1 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza, pneumococcal, and tetanus toxoid vaccination of adults – United States, 1993–1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 39 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Delayed supply of influenza vaccine and adjunct ACIP influenza vaccine recommendations for the 2000–01 influenza season. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 619 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in response to delays in supply of influenza vaccine for the 2000–01 season. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 888 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Delayed influenza vaccine availability for 2001–02 season and supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50: 582 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference6. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination levels among persons aged ≥ 65 years – United States, 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50: 532 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: Objectives for Improving Health. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingleton JA, Lu PJ, Strikas RA. Progress toward the Healthy People 2000 influenza vaccination objective, United States, 1997. In: Abstracts of the 34th National Immunization Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2000. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith DM, Zhou X-H, Weinberger M, Smith F, Mc Donald RC. Mailed reminders for area-wide influenza immunization: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999; 47: 1 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKellerman RK, Allred CT, Frisch LE. Enhancing influenza immunization: postcard and telephone reminders and the challenge of immunization site shift. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9: 368 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBriss PA, Rodewald LR, Hinman AR, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 97S – 140S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzilagyi PG, Bordley C, Vann JC, et al. Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates. JAMA. 2000; 284: 1820 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzilagyi PG, Rodewald LE, Humiston SG, et al. Immunization practices of pediatricians and family physicians in the United States. Pediatrics. 1994; 94: 517 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza activity—United States, 2000–01 season. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 1085 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker AM, Mc Carthy B, Gurley VF, Yood MU. Influenza immunization in a managed care organization. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13: 469 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider EC, Cleary PD, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparity in influenza vaccination: does managed care narrow the gap between African-Americans and whites? JAMA. 2001; 286: 1506 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Missed opportunities for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination of Medicare pneumonia inpatients—12 western states, 1995. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997; 46: 919 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFedson DS. Adult immunization: summary of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee report. JAMA. 1994; 272: 1133 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference20. American Board of Internal Medicine. Diplomates certified by state, as of January 22, 2001. Available at: http://www.abim.org/info/states.htm. Accessed March 1, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoel AJ, Singleton JA, Wooten K. Where adults reported receiving influenza vaccination, US, 1998/1999. In: Abstracts of the 35th National Immunization Conference. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. Med Care. 1996; 34: 873 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999; 282: 1458 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis JW, Lee E, Taira D, Chung R. Influenza vaccination, hospitalizations, and costs among members of a Medicare managed care plan. Med Care. 2001; 39: 1273 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, et al. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000; 284: 1655 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsch DA, Jedrziewski K, Christakis NA. Response rates to mailed surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 1129 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001; 35: 1347 – 55.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.