Show simple item record

In Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylinders

dc.contributor.authorRazzoog, Michael E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKoka, Sreenivasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:24:36Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:24:36Z
dc.date.issued1994-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationRazzoog, Michael E.; Koka, Sreenivas (1994). "In Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylinders." Journal of Prosthodontics 3(2): 103-107. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73524>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-849Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73524
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9227105&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two air-abrasive prophylaxis systems and the effect of inlet air pressure on the surface of BrÅnemark titanium abutment cylinders. Materials and Methods : Single abutment cylinders were treated with either the Prophy-Jet system (sodium bicarbonate abrasive) (Dentsply International, York, PA) or the Microprophy system (aluminum oxide abrasive) (Danville Engineering Co, Danville, CA) for 60 seconds at an inlet air pressure of 60 psi or 90 psi. The effects on the surface of each abutment cylinder were visually inspected by scanning electron microscopy. Results : A comparison of abutment cylinder surfaces after treatment showed that the Prophy Jet system removed machining marks to a greater degree than the Microprophy system. Sodium bicarbonate particles from the Prophy-Jet system were significantly larger than the aluminum oxide particles used with the Microprophy system, potentially accounting for the difference in abrasivity. In addition, inlet air pressure of 60 psi caused removal of machining marks to a greater degree than an inlet air pressure of 90 psi. The principle of phase separation may account for the lower inlet air pressure causing more removal of machining marks than the higher inlet air pressure. Conclusions : Under the experimental conditions tested, neither of the two systems tested seemed to cause significant abrasion of the surface of titanium abutment cylinders.en_US
dc.format.extent457954 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1994 by The American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.subject.otherTitaniumen_US
dc.subject.otherProphylaxisen_US
dc.subject.otherAir Abrasiveen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Implantsen_US
dc.titleIn Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylindersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Associate Professor. Department of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother† Assistant Professor, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center. College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9227105en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73524/1/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00136.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00136.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Zarb GA: The BrÅnemark Osseointegrated Implant. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArkinson DR, Cobb CM, Killoy WJ: The effect of an air powder abrasive system on in-vitro root surfaces. J Periodontol 1984; 55: 13 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetersson LG, Hellden L Jong Blocd W, et al: The effect of a jet abrasive instrument (Prophy jet) on root surfaces. Swed Dent J 1985; 9: 193 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubow RM, Cooley RL: Effect of air-powder abrasive instrument on restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 462 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHomiak AW, Cook PA, DeBoer J: Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 364 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalmsley AD, Williams AR, Laird WRE: The air-powder dental abrasive unit—an evaluation using a model system. J Oral Rehabil 1987; 14: 43 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoka S, Han JS, Razzoog ME, et al: The effects of two air-powder abrasive prophylaxis systems on the surface of machined titanium: A pilot study. Implant Dent 1992; 1: 259 – 265.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMishkin DJ, Engler WO, Javed T, et al: A clinical comparison of the effect on the gingiva of the Prophy-Jet and the rubber cup and paste techniques. J Periodontol 1986; 57: 151 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman PS, Silverwood RA, Dolby AE: The effects of an air-abrasive instrument on dental hard tissues, skin and oral mucosa. Br Dent J 1985; 159: 9 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKontturi-Narhi V, Markkanen S, Markkanen H: The gingival effects of dental airpolishing as evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Periodontol 1989; 60: 19 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown FH, Ogletree RC, Houston GD: Pneumoparotitis associated with the use of an air-powder prophylaxis unit. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 642 – 644.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallis GB: One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1969.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYuan SW: Foundations of Fluid Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1967.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.