In Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylinders
dc.contributor.author | Razzoog, Michael E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koka, Sreenivas | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T20:24:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T20:24:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Razzoog, Michael E.; Koka, Sreenivas (1994). "In Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylinders." Journal of Prosthodontics 3(2): 103-107. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73524> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1059-941X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-849X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73524 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9227105&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | : The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two air-abrasive prophylaxis systems and the effect of inlet air pressure on the surface of BrÅnemark titanium abutment cylinders. Materials and Methods : Single abutment cylinders were treated with either the Prophy-Jet system (sodium bicarbonate abrasive) (Dentsply International, York, PA) or the Microprophy system (aluminum oxide abrasive) (Danville Engineering Co, Danville, CA) for 60 seconds at an inlet air pressure of 60 psi or 90 psi. The effects on the surface of each abutment cylinder were visually inspected by scanning electron microscopy. Results : A comparison of abutment cylinder surfaces after treatment showed that the Prophy Jet system removed machining marks to a greater degree than the Microprophy system. Sodium bicarbonate particles from the Prophy-Jet system were significantly larger than the aluminum oxide particles used with the Microprophy system, potentially accounting for the difference in abrasivity. In addition, inlet air pressure of 60 psi caused removal of machining marks to a greater degree than an inlet air pressure of 90 psi. The principle of phase separation may account for the lower inlet air pressure causing more removal of machining marks than the higher inlet air pressure. Conclusions : Under the experimental conditions tested, neither of the two systems tested seemed to cause significant abrasion of the surface of titanium abutment cylinders. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 457954 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | 1994 by The American College of Prosthodontists | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Titanium | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Air Abrasive | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.title | In Vitro Analysis of the Effects of Two Air-Abrasive Prophylaxis Systems and Inlet Air Pressure on the Surface of Titanium Abutment Cylinders | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | * Associate Professor. Department of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | † Assistant Professor, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center. College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE. | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9227105 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73524/1/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00136.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00136.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Albrektsson T, Zarb GA: The BrÅnemark Osseointegrated Implant. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1989. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Arkinson DR, Cobb CM, Killoy WJ: The effect of an air powder abrasive system on in-vitro root surfaces. J Periodontol 1984; 55: 13 – 18. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Petersson LG, Hellden L Jong Blocd W, et al: The effect of a jet abrasive instrument (Prophy jet) on root surfaces. Swed Dent J 1985; 9: 193 – 199. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lubow RM, Cooley RL: Effect of air-powder abrasive instrument on restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 462 – 465. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Homiak AW, Cook PA, DeBoer J: Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 364 – 369. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Walmsley AD, Williams AR, Laird WRE: The air-powder dental abrasive unit—an evaluation using a model system. J Oral Rehabil 1987; 14: 43 – 50. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Koka S, Han JS, Razzoog ME, et al: The effects of two air-powder abrasive prophylaxis systems on the surface of machined titanium: A pilot study. Implant Dent 1992; 1: 259 – 265. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mishkin DJ, Engler WO, Javed T, et al: A clinical comparison of the effect on the gingiva of the Prophy-Jet and the rubber cup and paste techniques. J Periodontol 1986; 57: 151 – 154. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Newman PS, Silverwood RA, Dolby AE: The effects of an air-abrasive instrument on dental hard tissues, skin and oral mucosa. Br Dent J 1985; 159: 9 – 12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kontturi-Narhi V, Markkanen S, Markkanen H: The gingival effects of dental airpolishing as evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. J Periodontol 1989; 60: 19 – 22. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown FH, Ogletree RC, Houston GD: Pneumoparotitis associated with the use of an air-powder prophylaxis unit. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 642 – 644. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wallis GB: One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1969. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yuan SW: Foundations of Fluid Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1967. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.