View Item 

Show simple item record

SKEWNESS AND PERMUTATION

dc.contributor.authorKällersjö, Marien_US
dc.contributor.authorFarris, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKluge, Arnold G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBult, Carolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:31:50Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:31:50Z
dc.date.issued1992-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationKÄllersjÖ, Mari; Farris, James S.; Kluge, Arnold G.; Bult, Carol (1992). "SKEWNESS AND PERMUTATION." Cladistics 8(3): 275-287. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73640>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0748-3007en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-0031en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73640
dc.description.abstractThe skewness criterion of phylogenetic structure in data is too sensitive to character state frequencies, is not sensitive enough to number of characters (degree of corroboration) and relies on counts of arbitrarily-resolved bifurcating trees. For these reasons it can give misleading results. Permutation tests lack those drawbacks and can be performed quickly by using approximate parsimony calculations, but the test based on minimal tree length can imply strong structure in ambiguous data. A more satisfactory test is obtained by using a support measure which takes multiple trees into account.en_US
dc.format.extent933420 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1992 The Willi Hennig Societyen_US
dc.titleSKEWNESS AND PERMUTATIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Reptiles and Amphibians, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNaturhistoriska riksmuseet, MolekylÄrsystematiska laboratoriet, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Swedenen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St, New York, New York 10024, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLaboratory of Molecular Systematics, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73640/1/j.1096-0031.1992.tb00071.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1096-0031.1992.tb00071.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCladisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArchie J.W.. 1989. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Syst. Zool. 38: 219 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBremer K.. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrisci J.V., E.A. Zimmer, P.C. Hoch, G.B. Johnson, C. Mudd and N.S. Pan. 1990. Phylogenetic implications of ribosomal DNA reconstruction site variation in the plant family Onagraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 633 – 699.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlgren R. and K. Bremer. 1985. Major clades of the angiosperms. Cladistics 1: 349 – 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonoghue M.J., R.G. Olmstead, J.F. Smith and J.D. Palmer. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbc L sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. ( in press ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaith D.. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Syst. Zool. 40: 366 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaith D. and P. Cranston. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone ?. Cladistics 7: 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris J.S.. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18: 374 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris J.S.. 1985. Distance data revisited. Cladistics 1: 67 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris J.S.. 1991. Excess homoplasy ratios. Cladistics 7: 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarris J.S., A.G. Kluge and M.F. Mickevich. 1982. Immunological distances and the phylogenetic relationships of the Rana boylii species group. Syst. Zool. 31: 479 – 491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitch W.M.. 1979. Cautionary remarks on using gene expression events in parsimony procedures. Syst. Zool. 28: 375 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamby R.K.. 1990. Ribosomal RNA and the early evolution of flowering plants. Ph.D. thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuelsenbeck J.P.. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Syst. Zool. 3: 257 – 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillis D.M.. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In: Miyamoto M.M. and J. Cracraft, ( eds. ) Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Quesne W.J.. 1989. Frequency distributions of lengths of possible networks from a data matrix. Cladistics 5: 395 – 407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiggins R.R. and J.S. Farris. 1983. Cladistics and the roots of angiosperms. Syst. Bot. 8: 96 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung D.A.. 1981. Are the angiosperms primitively vesselless ?. Syst. Bot. 6: 313 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalpole R.E., 1983. Elementary Statistical Concepts. Macmillan, New York.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1096-0031.1992.tb00071.x.pdf
Size:
911.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.