Show simple item record

Impact of Technetium-99m Sestamibi Imaging on the Emergency Department Management and Costs in the Evaluation of Low-risk Chest Pain

dc.contributor.authorKosnik, Joseph W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZalenski, Robert J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrzybowski, Maryen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Raywinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSweeny, Padraic J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWelch, Robert D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:40:47Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:40:47Z
dc.date.issued2001-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationKosnik, Joseph W.; Zalenski, Robert J.; Grzybowski, Mary; Huang, Raywin; Sweeny, Padraic J.; Welch, Robert D. (2001). "Impact of Technetium-99m Sestamibi Imaging on the Emergency Department Management and Costs in the Evaluation of Low-risk Chest Pain." Academic Emergency Medicine 8(4): 315-323. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73784>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73784
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11282665&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the impact of rest sestamibi scanning on emergency physicians' (EPs') diagnostic certainty and decision making (as assessed by the hypothetical disposition of patients) for 69 consenting stable patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. The resultant impact on costs was examined as a secondary outcome. Methods: Patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia were injected with 25 mCi of sestamibi within two hours of active pain in one of three emergency department study sites. The probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina (UA), and hypothetical disposition decisions were recorded immediately before and after physicians were notified of scan results. Changes in disposition were classified as optimal or suboptimal. For the cost determinations, a cost-based decision support program was used. Results: For the subgroup found to be free of acute cardiac events (ACEs) ( n = 62), the EPs' post-sestamibi scan probabilities for AMI decreased by 11% and UA by 18% (p < 0.001 for both conditions). In seven patients with ACEs, the post-scan probabilities of AMI and UA increased, but neither was statistically significant. Scan results led to hypothetical disposition changes in 29 patients (42%), of which 27 (93%) were optimal (nine patients were reassigned to a lower level of care, two to a higher level, and 16 additional patients to “discharge-home” status). The strategy of scanning all patients who were low to moderate risk for acute cardiac ischemia would result in an increase of direct costs of care of $222 per patient evaluated, due to added cost of sestamibi scanning. Conclusions: Sestamibi scanning results appropriately affected the EPs' estimates of the probability of AMI and UA and improved disposition decisions. Scanning all low-risk patients would likely be associated with increased costs at this medical center.en_US
dc.format.extent153855 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2001 Society for Academic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherSestamibi Imagingen_US
dc.subject.otherChest Painen_US
dc.subject.otherCost Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Departmenten_US
dc.titleImpact of Technetium-99m Sestamibi Imaging on the Emergency Department Management and Costs in the Evaluation of Low-risk Chest Painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan (MG), Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Emergency Medicine (JWK, RJZ, MG, RH, PJS, RDW), Wayne State University, Detroit, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Healthcare Effectiveness Research (MG), Wayne State University, Detroit, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, John D. Dingell Veterans Hospital (RJZ), Detroit, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11282665en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73784/1/j.1553-2712.2001.tb02108.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb02108.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStussman, BJ. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1995 Emergency Department Summary. Advance data from Vital and Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics. 1997; 285 ;( Apr 15 ): 1 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibler, WB, Lewis, LM, Erb, RE, et al. Early detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs; serial CK-MB sampling in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 9: 1359 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibler, WB, Young, GP, Hedges, JR, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in chest pain patients with non-diagnostic ECGs: serial CK-MB sampling in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 504 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeingarten, SR, Ermann, B, Riedinger, MS, Shah, PK, Ellrodt, AG. Selecting the best triage rule for patients hospitalized with chest pain. Am J Med. 1989; 87: 494 – 500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, R, Kleiman, NS Earlier diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction necessitates the need for a “new diagnostic mind-set.” Circulation. 1994; 89: 872 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldman, L, Cook, EF, Brand, DA, et al. A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 797 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePozen, MW, D'Agostin, RB, Mitchell, JB, et al. The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admission to the coronary care unit. Ann Intern Med. 1980; 92: 238 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelker, HP, Griffith, JL, Patil, S, Long, WJ, D'Agostino, RB. A comparison of performance of mathematical predictive methods for medical diagnosis: identifying acute cardiac ischemia among emergency department patients. J Invest Med. 1995; 43: 468 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuleo, PR, Meyer, D, Wathen, C, et al. Use of a rapid assay of subforms of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 561 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibler, WB, Runyon, JP, Levy, RC, et al. A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25: 1 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorowitz, RS, Morganroth, J, Parrotto, C, et al. Immediate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1982; 65: 323 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaretto, T, Cantalupi, D, Altieri, A, Orlandi, C. Emergency room technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1804 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHilton, T, Thompson, R, Williams, H, et al. Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 1016 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKontos, MC, Jesse, RL, Schmidt, KL, Ornato, JP, Tatum, JL. Value of acute rest sestamibi perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 976 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatum, JL, Jesse, RL, Kontos, MC, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29: 116 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosnik, JW, Zalenski, RJ, Shamsa, F, et al. Resting sestamibi imaging for the prognosis of low risk chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 998 – 1004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelker, HP, Griffith, FL, D'Agostino, RD. A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use: a time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study. Med Care. 1991; 29: 610 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMikhail, MG, Smith, FA, Gray, M, Britton, C, Frederiksen, SM. Cost—effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29: 88 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeter, J, Wasserman, W, Kutner, MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs, 2nd edition. Homewood, IL: Irwin, Inc., 1985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeissman, IA, Dickinson, CZ, Dworkin, HJ, O'Neill, WW, Junie, JE. Cost—effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT in the emergency department evaluation of patients with unexplained chest pain. Radiology. 1996; 199: 353 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadensky, PW, Hilton, TC, Fulmer, H, McLaughlin, BA, Stowers, SA. Potential cost—effectiveness of initial myocardial perfusion imaging for assessment of emergency department patients with chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79: 595 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeller, GV, Stowers, SA, Hendel, RC, et al. Clinical value of acute rest technetium-99m tetrofosmin tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1011 – 7.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.