View Item 

Show simple item record

Risk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantation

dc.contributor.authorEnglesbe, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDubay, Derek A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Brenda W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoyer, A. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPelletier, Shawn J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSung, Randall S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMagee, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPunch, Jeffery D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Darrell A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:41:02Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:41:02Z
dc.date.issued2007-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationEnglesbe, M. J.; Dubay, D. A.; Gillespie, B. W.; Moyer, A. S.; Pelletier, S. J.; Sung, R. S.; Magee, J. C.; Punch, J. D.; Campbell, D. A.; Merion, R. M. (2007). "Risk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantation." American Journal of Transplantation 7(6): 1536-1541. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73788>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73788
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17430402&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent77004 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.titleRisk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17430402en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73788/1/j.1600-6143.2007.01790.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01790.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhauli RB, Ayvazian PJ. Modified extravesical ureteroneocystostomy and routine ureteral stenting in renal transplantation: Experience in 300 consecutive cases. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 2665 – 2666.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDominguez J, Clase CM, Mahalati K et al. Is routine ureteric stenting needed in kidney transplantation? A randomized trial. Transplantation 2000; 70: 597 – 601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCimic J, Meuleman EJ, Oosterhof GO, Hoitsma AJ. Urological complications in renal transplantation. A comparison between living-related and cadaveric grafts. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 433 – 435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassiri A, Amiransari B, Yazdani M, Sesavar Y, Gol S. Renal transplantation using ureteral stents. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2593 – 2594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenoit G, Blanchet P, Eschwege P, Alexandre L, Bensadoun H, Charpentier B. Insertion of a double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: A prospective randomized study. J Urol 1996; 156: 881 – 884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar A, Kumar R, Bhandari M. Significance of routine JJ stenting in living related renal transplantation: A prospective randomised study. Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 2995 – 2997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaskowski A, Jones RM, Murie JA, Morris PJ. Urological complications in 600 consecutive renal transplants. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 922 – 925.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrench CG, Acott PD, Crocker JF, Bitter-Suermann H, Lawen JG. Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy with and without internalized ureteric stents in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 21 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMangus RS, Haag BW. Stented versus nonstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: A metaanalysis. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1889 – 1896.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePleass HC, Clark KR, Rigg KM et al. Urologic complications after renal transplantation: A prospective randomized trial comparing different techniques of ureteric anastomosis and the use of prophylactic ureteric stents. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 1091 – 1092.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRigg KM, Proud G, Taylor RM. Urological complications following renal transplantation. A study of 1016 consecutive transplants from a single centre. Transpl Int 1994; 7: 120 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShoskes DA, Hanbury D, Cranston D, Morris PJ. Urological complications in 1,000 consecutive renal transplant recipients. J Urol 1995; 153: 18 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhl DA, Konnak JW, Campbell DA, Dafoe DC, Merion RM, Turcotte JG. Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. J Urol 1988; 139: 499 – 502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSecin FP, Rovegno AR, Marrugat RE, Virasoro R, Lautersztein GA, Fernandez H. Comparing Taguchi and Lich-Gregoir ureterovesical reimplantation techniques for kidney transplants. J Urol 2002; 168: 926 – 930.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZomorrodi A, Bahluli A. Evaluation of urologic complications in 30 cases of kidney transplantation with technique of proper exposure edge of bladder mucosa and U-stitch ureteroneocystostomy. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 2662 – 2663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceModlin CS, Flechner SM, Boparai N, Goldfarb DA, Novick AC. U-stitch ureteroneocystostomy: A new renal transplantation ureteral reimplantation technique associated with reduced urologic complications. Tech Urol 2000; 6: 1 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSumrani NB, Lipkowitz GS, Hong JH, Hanson P, Butt KM. Complications of “one stitch” extravesical ureteric implantation in renal transplants in the cyclosporine and precyclosporine eras. Transplant Proc 1989; 21 ( 1 Pt 2 ): 1957 – 1959.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaenza A, Nardo B, Catena F et al. Ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation. A study on 869 consecutive transplants. Transpl Int 1999; 12: 334 – 340.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingh D, Lawen J, Alkhudair W. Does pretransplant obesity affect the outcome in kidney transplant recipients? Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 717 – 720.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks WH, Florence LS, Chapman PH, Precht AF, Perkinson DT. Morbid obesity is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 635 – 638.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhilosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68: 497 – 502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722 – 728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuo PC, Cho ES, Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Bartlett ST, Johnson LB. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 559 – 563.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2007.01790.x.pdf
Size:
75.19KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.