View Item 

Show simple item record

Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries

dc.contributor.authorCohenca, Nestoren_US
dc.contributor.authorSimon, James H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoges, Ramonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorag, Yoaven_US
dc.contributor.authorMalfaz, Jose Mariaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:42:57Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2007-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationCohenca, Nestor; Simon, James H.; Roges, Ramon; Morag, Yoav; Malfaz, Jose Maria (2007). "Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries." Dental Traumatology 23(2): 95-104. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73819>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73819
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17367457&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent1265316 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Munksgaarden_US
dc.subject.otherDental Traumaen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherDigital Imagingen_US
dc.subject.otherComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subject.otherCone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subject.otherLuxation Injuriesen_US
dc.subject.otherRoot Fractureen_US
dc.titleClinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Surgical, Therapeutic and Bioengineering Sciences, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17367457en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73819/1/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceDental Traumatologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkdeniz BG, Sogur E. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 397 – 401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNair MK, Nair UDP, Grondahl HG, Webber RL, Wallace JA. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 375 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTanrikulu R, Erol B. Comparison of computed tomography with conventional radiography for midfacial fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 141 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbreu M Jr, Yi-Ching L, Abreu AL. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 93 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlenk G, Kovacs A. Do we need three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial surgery? J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15: 842 – 50; discussion 850.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLudlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanforth RA, Dus I, Mah J. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 817 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 28 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrope M, Pettigrew J, Petras J, Barnett F, Tronstad L. Differentiation of radicular cyst and granulomas using computerized tomography. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989; 5: 69 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrout MK, Hall JM, Hildebolt CE. Differentiation of periapical granulomas and radicular cysts by digital radiometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 356 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCotti E, Vargiu P, Dettori C, Mallarini G. Computerized tomography in the management and follow-up of extensive periapical lesion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 186 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamps J, Pommel L, Bukiet F. Evaluation of periapical lesion healing by correction of gray values. J Endod 2004; 30: 762 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 126 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMah J, Enciso R, Jorgensen M. Management of impacted cuspids using 3-D volumetric imaging. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 835 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlder ME, Deahl ST, Matteson SR. Clinical usefulness of two-dimensional reformatted and three-dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images: literature review and a survey of surgeons’ opinions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53: 375 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlinkhorn FA. The aetiology of dento-alveolar injuries and factors influencing attendance for emergency care of adolescents in the north west of England. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16: 162 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSgan-Cohen HD, Megnagi G, Jacobi Y. Dental trauma and its association with anatomic, behavioral, and social variables among fifth and sixth grade schoolchildren in Jerusalem. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 174 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Classification, etiology and epidemiology. In: Andreasen F, editor. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 3rd edn. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1994. pp 151 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndreasen FM. Histological and bacteriological study of pulps extirpated after luxation injuries. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988; 4: 170 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatteson SR, Deahl ST, Alder ME, Nummikoski PV. Advanced imaging methods. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7: 346 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFullerton GD, Potter JL. Computed tomography. In: Putman CE, Ravin CE, editors. Textbook of diagnostic imaging. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1988. pp 47 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; 46: 1016 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalra MK, Maher MM, D'Souza R, Saini S. Multidetector computed tomography technology: current status and emerging developments. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28 ( Suppl. 1 ): S2 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ. Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2005; 235: 756 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkle DR, Ringler SL, Luttenton CR, Beernink JH, Peterson NT, Dean RE. Comparison of the diagnostic methods used in maxillofacial trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75: 32 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHornak JP. The basics of MRI. http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/mri/; 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDamadian R, Goldsmith M, Minkoff L. NMR in cancer: XVI. FONAR image of the live human body. Physiol Chem Phys 1977; 9: 97 – 100, 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMansfield P, Maudsley AA. Medical imaging by NMR. Br J Radiol 1977; 50: 188 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukatsu H. 3T MR for clinical use: update. Magn Reson Med Sci 2003; 2: 37 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaine FJ, Conway WF, Laskin DM. Radiology of maxillofacial trauma. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 1993; 22: 145 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 847 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEggers G, Mukhamadiev D, Hassfeld S. Detection of foreign bodies of the head with digital volume tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 74 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 525 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 825 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaumrind S, Carlson S, Beers A, Curry S, Norris K, Boyd RL. Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a progress report from the University of the Pacific. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 ( Suppl. 1 ): 132 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 ( Suppl. 1 ): 95 – 101; discussion 179 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 803 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNgan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2003; 19: 67 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 236 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibbs SJ. Effective dose equivalent and effective dose: comparison for common projections in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 538 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 371 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceImamura H, Sato H, Matsuura T, Ishikawa M, Zeze R. A comparative study of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibular canals and cross-sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 75 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasel CJ, Pretterklieber M, Gahleitner A, Czerny C, Breitenseher M, Imhof H. Osteometry of the mandible performed using dental MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1221 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGahleitner A, Solar P, Nasel C, Homolka P, Youssefzadeh S, Ertl L et al. Magnetic resonance tomography in dental radiology (dental MRI). Radiologe 1999; 39: 1044 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGassner R, Bosch R, Tuli T, Emshoff R. Prevalence of dental trauma in 6000 patients with facial injuries: implications for prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 27 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKositbowornchai S, Nuansakul R, Sikram S, Sinahawattana S, Saengmontri S. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 106 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100 ( Suppl. 2 ): S75 – 96.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x.pdf
Size:
1.206MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.