View Item 

Show simple item record

Determinants of Discard of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys: Impact of Biopsy and Machine Perfusion

dc.contributor.authorSung, Randall S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Laura L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeichtman, Alan B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGreenstein, S. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDistant, Dale A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWynn, James J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStegall, Mark D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDelmonico, Francis L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPort, Friedrich K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:43:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2008-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationSung, R. S.; Christensen, L. L.; Leichtman, A. B.; Greenstein, S. M.; Distant, D. A.; Wynn, J. J.; Stegall, M. D.; Delmonico, F. L.; Port, F. K. (2008). "Determinants of Discard of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys: Impact of Biopsy and Machine Perfusion." American Journal of Transplantation 8(4): 783-792. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73820>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73820
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18294347&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent877061 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2008 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.subject.otherBiopsyen_US
dc.subject.otherDelayed Graft Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherDiscard Ratesen_US
dc.subject.otherExpanded Criteria Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherGlomerulosclerosisen_US
dc.subject.otherGraft Failureen_US
dc.subject.otherMachine Perfusionen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of Discard of Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys: Impact of Biopsy and Machine Perfusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, SUNY/Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MNen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18294347en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73820/1/j.1600-6143.2008.02157.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02157.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 2005 Annual Report, Table 5.4. Available from: https://www.ustransplant.org, Accessed December 15, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOjo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 589 – 597.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey EJ et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 701 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung RS, Guidinger MK, Lake C et al. Impact of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney allocation system on the utilization of ECD kidneys. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1257 – 1261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee CM, Scandling JD, Pavlakis M, Markezich AJ, Dafoe DC, Alfrey EJ. A review of kidneys that nobody wanted: Determinants of optimal outcome. Transplantation 1998; 65: 213 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC et al. The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1940 – 1945.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoshi MD, Hunsicker LG. Short- and long-term outcomes with the use of kidneys and livers donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 121 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards EB, Posner MP, Maluf DG, Kauffman HM. Reasons for non-use of recovered kidneys: The effect of donor glomerulosclerosis and creatinine clearance on graft survival. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1411 – 1415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCecka JM, Cohen B, Rosendale J, Smith M. Could more effective use of kidneys recovered from older deceased donors result in more kidney transplants for older patients? Transplantation 2006; 81: 966 – 970.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Eng J Med 2006; 354: 343 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRandhawa PS, Minervini MI, Lombardero M et al. Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: Correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 2000; 69: 1352 – 1357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePokorna E, Vitko S, Chadimova M, Schuck O, Ekberg H. Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 36 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipkowitz GS, Leichtman AB, Christensen LL et al. Procurement, utilization and initial outcome in a prospective ECD study. Am J Transplant 2005; 5S11 ( abstract ): 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 543 – 549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: A rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 293 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsuoka L, Shah T, Aswad S et al. Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1473 – 1478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuarrara JV, Polyak MM, Arrington B et al. Pushing the envelope in renal preservation: Improved results with novel perfusate modifications for pulsatile machine perfusion of cadaver kidneys. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 1257 – 1260.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2008.02157.x.pdf
Size:
856.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.