Show simple item record

The Impact of Parity on Course of Labor in a Contemporary Population

dc.contributor.authorVahratian, Anjelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Matthew K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTroendle, James F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Junen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:43:35Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:43:35Z
dc.date.issued2006-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationVahratian, Anjel; Hoffman, Matthew K.; Troendle, James F.; Zhang, Jun (2006). "The Impact of Parity on Course of Labor in a Contemporary Population." Birth 33(1): 12-17. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73829>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0730-7659en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-536Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73829
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16499527&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Few studies have examined in depth the labor progression of multiparas to determine if there is any additional impact of being parous beyond the first birth. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of parity on labor progression in contemporary obstetric practice . Methods: Our sample consisted of all low-risk women who delivered a term, live-born infant from January 2002 to March 2004 at a single institution in Delaware, United States ( n =  5,589). The median duration of labor by each centimeter of cervical dilation was computed for parity = 0 ( n =  2,645); parity = 1 ( n =  1,839); parity = 2 ( n =  750); and parity = 3 + ( n =  355) . Results: Multiparas had a significantly faster labor progression from 4 to 10 cm (293, 300, and 313 min, respectively, for parity = 1, parity = 2, and parity = 3 +), compared with nulliparas (383 min for parity = 0), as well as a shorter second stage of labor. However, no significant differences were found in duration of the active phase or the second stage of labor among multiparas . Conclusions: Additional childbearing appears to have no effect of on the progression of labor among multiparous subgroups. The difference in duration of the active phase between nulliparas and multiparas is substantially smaller in a contemporary population. (BIRTH 33:1 March 2006)en_US
dc.format.extent102377 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Publishing, Inc. 2006en_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Parity on Course of Labor in a Contemporary Populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumAnjel Vahratian, James Troendle, and Jun Zhang are in the Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland; and Matthew Hoffman is in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA. Dr. Vahratian is now affiliated with the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16499527en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73829/1/j.0730-7659.2006.00069.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00069.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBirthen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954; 68: 1568 – 1575.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA. Primigravid labor: A graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955; 6: 567 – 589.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA. Labor in multiparas: A graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1956; 8: 691 – 703.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergsjo P, Bakketeig L, Eikhom SN. Duration of labour with spontaneous onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Sc and 1979; 58: 129 – 134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation & Management. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA, Kroll BH. Computer analysis of labor progression. III. Pattern variations by parity. J Reprod Med 1971; 6: 179 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilpatrick SJ, Laros Jr RK. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 85 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeisner DB, Rosen MG. Latent phase of labor in normal patients: A reassessment. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 644 – 648.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbers LL, for the CNM Data Group 1996. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 114 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurewitsch ED, Diament P, Fong J, et al. The labor curve of the grand multipara: Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1331 – 1338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurewitsch ED, Johnson E, Allen RH, et al. The descent curve of the grand multiparous woman. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1036 – 1041.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArulkumaran S, Gibb DMF, Lun KC, et al. The effect of parity on uterine activity in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 843 – 848.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuntunen K, Kirkinen P. Partogram of a grand multipara: Different descent slope compared with an ordinary parturient. J Perinat Med 1994; 22: 213 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52 (10): 1 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Berlin: Springer, 1997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison PD. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide: SAS Institute Inc., 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference17.  SAS Institute Inc. SAS Online Doc, Version 8, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNesheim B. Duration of labor: An analysis of influencing factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 121 – 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman EA. The labor curve. Clin Perinatol 1981; 8: 15 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbers LL, Schiff M, Gorwoda JG. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 355 – 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 2004; 291: 2847 – 2850.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 943 – 951.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunderson E, Abrams B. Epidemiology of gestational weight gain and body weight changes after pregnancy. Epidemiol Rev 1999; 21: 261 – 275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman SA. The effect of pregnancy weight gain on later obesity. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 148 – 155.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg L, Palmer JR, Wise LA, et al. A prospective study of the effect of childbearing on weight gain in African-American women. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1526 – 1535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiega-Riz AM, Evenson KR, Dole N. Pregnancy-related weight gain—a link to obesity? Nutr Rev 2004; 62: S105 – S111.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.