Landowners' Responses to an Endangered Species Act Listing and Implications for Encouraging Conservation
dc.contributor.author | Brook, Amara | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zint, Michaela | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | De Young, Raymond | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T20:45:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T20:45:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | BROOK, AMARA; ZINT, MICHAELA; DE YOUNG, RAYMOND (2003). "Landowners' Responses to an Endangered Species Act Listing and Implications for Encouraging Conservation." Conservation Biology 17(6): 1638-1649. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73866> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0888-8892 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1523-1739 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73866 | |
dc.description.abstract | Private landowners manage many rare species' habitats, yet research on their responses to species conservation legislation is scarce. To address this need, we examined private landowners' responses to the listing of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse ( Zapus hudsonius preblei ) as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). We mailed a questionnaire designed to measure these responses to a sample of landowners. The adjusted response rate was 46% ( n 379). The questionnaire asked landowners whether they had managed their land to improve the Preble's habitat and to minimize the chance of the Preble's living on it. We also asked whether landowners had or would allow a survey for the Preble's on their property. We hypothesized that landowners would respond to these questions based on their aesthetic preferences, economic concerns, information sources, parcel size, personal values, recreation activities, residence status, social influences, and other factors. Listing the Preble's under the ESA does not appear to have enhanced its survival prospects on private land. In terms of hectares owned, for example, the efforts of landowners who reported they had sought to help the Preble's (25%) were canceled out by the efforts of those who sought to harm it (26%). Moreover, the majority of respondents had not or would not allow a biological survey (56%), thus preventing the collection of data for conserving the species. All eight hypothesized determinants significantly predicted responses to the listing when they were considered individually. When considered simultaneously, however, only one economic consideration (dependence on agriculture), recreation activity (consumptive), and social factor (distrusting government), and select information sources (conservation and social), and personal values (valuing nature, valuing local control, and denying landowner responsibility) remained direct determinants. To promote the conservation of rare species by private landowners, we recommend communicating information through social networks, alleviating landowners' economic concerns, increasing use of collaborative processes, and institutionalizing assurances that landowners will not be harmed by managing their land to help rare species. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 183555 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Science Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | The Journal of the society for Conservation Biology | en_US |
dc.title | Landowners' Responses to an Endangered Species Act Listing and Implications for Encouraging Conservation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Dana Building, 430 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 1115, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73866/1/j.1523-1739.2003.00258.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00258.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Conservation Biology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bean, M. J., and D. S. Wilcove. 1997. The private-land problem. Conservation Biology 11: 1 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Benson, D. E. 1991. Values and management of wildlife and recreation on private land in South Africa. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19: 497 510. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bliss, J. C., and A. J. Martin. 1989. Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Science 35: 601 622. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bourke, L., and A. E. Luloff. 1994. Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land. Society and Natural Resources 7: 445 457. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brehm, J. W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brewer, M. B., and R. J. Brown. 1998. Intergroup relations. Pages 554 594 in D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, G. Lindzey, editors. The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, Boston. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brook, A. 1999. Landowner responses to an Endangered Species Act listing: some recommendations for encouraging private land conservation. M.S. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Caporael, L. R., R. M. Dawes, J. M. Orbell, and A. J. Van de Kragt. 1989. Selfishness examined: cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 683 739. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carr, S., and J. Tait. 1991. Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications. Journal of Environmental Management 32: 281 294. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dunlap, R. E., and K. D. Van Liere. 1978. The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9: 10 19. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Environmental Defense Fund. 1999. Safe harbor: helping landowners help endangered species. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Erickson, D. L., and R. De Young. 1993. Management of farm woodlots and windbreaks: some psychological and landscape patterns. Journal of Environmental Systems 22: 233 247. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fisher, E. 1996. Habitat conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act: no surprises and the quest for certainty. University of Colorado Law Review 67: 371 405. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fortmann, L., and L. Huntsinger. 1989. The effects of nonmetropolitan population growth on resource management. Society and Natural Resources 2: 9 22. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Green, S. B., N. J. Salkind, and T. M. Akey. 2000. Using SPSS for Windows: analyzing and understanding data. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Grieshop, J. I., E. MacMullan, S. Brush, C. Pickel, and F. G. Zalom. 1990. Extending integrated pest management by public mandate: a case study from California. Society and Natural Resources 3: 33 51. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hawken, P., A. Lovins, and L. H. Lovins. 1999. Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown, Boston. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Haymond, J. L. 1990. Wildlife attitudes of early adopters who own forestland. Society and Natural Resources 3: 11 18. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holsman, R. H. 2000. Goodwill hunting Exploring the role of hunters as ecosystem stewards. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 808 816. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Honnold, D., J. A. Jackson, and S. Lowry. 1997. Habitat conservation plans and the protection of habitat: reply to Bean and Wilcove. Conservation Biology 11: 297 299. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hoyle, R. H. editor. 1995. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hudson, W. E. 1994. Building economic incentives into the Endangered Species Act. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | James, S. M. 2002. Bridging the gap between private landowners and conservationists. Conservation Biology 16: 269 271. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kalton, G. 1983. Introduction to survey sampling. Sage, Newbury Park, California. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kellert, S. R. 1980. American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: an update. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 1: 87 119. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Klem, L. 1999. Personal communication to Amara Brook. University of Michigan Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, Ann Arbor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Korsching, P. F., and T. J. I. Hoban. 1990. Relationships between information sources and farmers' conservation perceptions and behavior. Society and Natural Resources 3: 1 10. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kraus, S. J. 1995. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21: 58 75. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lepkowski, J. M., and M. P. Couper. 1999. Analysis of survey data. I: Course notes. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Makowski, T. J., A. J. Sofranko, and J. C. Van Es. 1990. Agroecological and policy influences on no-till adoption. Society and Natural Resources 3: 361 371. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McCann, E., S. Sullivan, D. Erickson, and R. De Young. 1997. Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management 21: 747 758. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Napier, T. L., and S. M. Camboni. 1988. Attitudes toward a proposed soil conservation program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43: 186 191. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ochterski, J. A. 1996. Why land is protected: motivations underlying real estate donations to land conservancies. M.S. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Opotow, S. 1993. Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues 49: 71 85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Opotow, S., and A. Brook. 2004. Identity and exclusion in rangeland conflict. Pages 505 556 in S. Clayton and S. Opotow, editors. Identity and the natural environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Osterman, D. A., and T. L. Hicks. 1988. Highly erodible land: farmer perceptions versus actual measurements. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43: 177 182. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peterson, T. R., and C. C. Horton. 1995. Rooted in the soil: how understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. Quarterly Journal of Speech 81: 139 166. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reading, R. P., T. W. Clark, and S. R. Kellert. 1994. Attitudes and knowledge of people living in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Society and Natural Resources 7: 349 365. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Salant, P., and D. A. Dillman. 1994. How to conduct your own survey. Wiley, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schwartz, S. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Pages 221 279 in L. Berkowitz, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stein, B. A., T. Breden, and R. Warner. 1995. Significance of federal lands for endangered species. Pages 398 401 in E. T. LaRoe, editor. Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. National Biological Service, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sullivan, S., E. McCann, R. De Young, and D. Erickson. 1996. Farmers' attitudes about farming and the environment: a survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9: 123 143. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Theodori, G. L., A. E. Luloff, and F. K. Willits. 1998. The association of outdoor recreation and environmental concern: reexamining the Dunlap-Heffernan thesis. Rural Sociology 63: 94 108. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tietenberg, T. 2000. Environmental and natural resource economics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tyler, T. R., and E. A. Lind. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 115 191. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tyler, T. R., and H. J. Smith. 1998. Social justice and social movements. Pages 595 629 in D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, editor. The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, Boston. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998 a. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: final rule to list the Preble's meadow jumping mouse as a threatened species. Federal Register 63: 26517 26530. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998 b. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: proposed special regulations for the Preble's meadow jumping mouse. Federal Register 63: 66777 66784. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: final special regulations for the Preble's meadow jumping mouse. Federal Register 66: 28125 28131. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: designation of critical habitat for the Preble's meadow jumping mouse ( Zapus hudsonius preblei ); proposed rule. Federal Register 67: 47154 47210. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Endangered Species Act: information on species protection on nonfederal lands. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vogel, S. 1996. Farmers' environmental attitudes and behavior: a case study for Austria. Environment and Behavior 28: 591 613. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Weicher, J. C. 1995. Changes in distribution of wealth: increasing inequality Review: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 77: 5 23. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | West, P. C., J. M. Fly, D. J. Blahna, and E. M. Carpenter. 1988. The communication and diffusion of NIPF management strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5: 265 270. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilcove, D. S., M. J. Bean, R. Bonnie, and M. McMillan. 1996. Rebuilding the Ark: toward a more effective Endangered Species Act for private land. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wondolleck, J. M., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.