View Item 

Show simple item record

Visual cortical inhibitory function in migraine is not generally impaired: evidence from a combined psychophysical test with an fMRI study

dc.contributor.authorHuang, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeLano, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yueen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:51:35Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2006-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationHuang, J; DeLano, M; Cao, Y (2006). "Visual cortical inhibitory function in migraine is not generally impaired: evidence from a combined psychophysical test with an fMRI study." Cephalalgia 26(5): 554-560. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73957>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0333-1024en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-2982en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73957
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16674764&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent117651 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Publishing Ltd Cephalalgia , 2006en_US
dc.subject.otherCortical Hyperexcitabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherCortical Inhibitionen_US
dc.subject.otherFunctional MRIen_US
dc.subject.otherMigraine With Auraen_US
dc.subject.otherVisual Maskingen_US
dc.titleVisual cortical inhibitory function in migraine is not generally impaired: evidence from a combined psychophysical test with an fMRI studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16674764en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73957/1/j.1468-2982.2006.01067.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01067.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCephalalgiaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHay KM, Mortimer MJ, Barker DC, Debney LM, Good PA. 1044 women with migraine: the effect of environmental stimuli. Headache 1994; 34: 166 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCao Y, Welch KMA, Aurora S, Vikingstad EM. Functional MRI-BOLD of visually triggered headache in patients with migraine. Arch Neurol 1999; 56: 548 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCao Y, Aurora SK, Nagesh V, Patel SC, Welch KM. Functional MRI-BOLD of brainstem structures during visually triggered migraine. Neurology 2002; 59: 72 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkins A, Nimmo-Smith I, Tait A et al. A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain 1984; 107: 989 – 1017.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcus DA, Soso MJ. Migraine and stripe-induced visual discomfort. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1129 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang J, Cooper TG, Satana B, Kaufman DI, Cao Y. Visual distortion provoked by a stimulus in migraine associated with hyperneuronal activity. Headache 2003; 43: 664 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGawel M, Connolly JF, Rose FC. Migraine patients exhibit abnormalities in the visual evoked potential. Headache 1983; 23: 49 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoestenburg JC, Kramer CJ, Orlebeke JF, Passchier J. Brain potential differences related to spatial attention in migraineurs with and without aura symptoms support supposed differences in activation. Headache 1993; 33: 413 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAurora SK, Ahmad BK, Welch KMA, Bhardhwaj P, Ramadan NM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital migraine. Neurology 1998; 50: 1111 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCao Y, Aurora S, Vikingstad EM, Patel SC, Welch KMA. Functional MRI of the red nucleus and occipital cortex during visual stimulation of subjects with migraine. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAurora SK, Cao Y, Bowyer SM, Welch KMA. The occipital cortex is hyperexcitable in migraine: evidence from TMS, fMRI, and MEG studies. Headache 1999; 39: 469 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShepherd AJ. Increased visual after-effects following pattern adaptation in migraine: a lack of intracortical excitation? Brain 2001; 124: 2310 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAfra J, Macia A, Gerard P, Maertens de Noordhout A, Schoenen J. Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 209 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohotin V, Fumal A, Vandenheede M, Gerard P, Bohotin C, Maertens de Noordhout A, Schoenen J. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine. Brain 2002; 125: 912 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWelch KM, D’Andrea G, Tepley N, Barkley G, Ramadan NM. The concept of migraine as a state of central neuronal hyperexcitability. Neuro Clin 1990; 8: 817 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChronicle E, Mulleners W. Might migraine damage the brain? Cephalalgia 1994; 14: 415 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValverde F. The organizing principles of the primary visual cortex in the monkey. In: Peters A, Jones EG, editors. Visual cortex. New York: Plenum Press 1985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrban GA. Neuronal operations in the visual cortex. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacknik SL, Livingstone MS. Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience 1998; 1: 144 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer JE, Chronicle EP, Rolan P, Mulleners WM. Cortical hyperexcitability is cortical under-inhibition: evidence from a novel functional test of migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 525 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang J, Xiang M, Cao Y. Reduction in cortical activation associated with decreased visibility of a visual target. Proc Int Soc Mag Reson Med 2003; 11: 1915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference22  Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988; 8: 1 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSereno MI, Dale AM, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Brady TJ et al. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1995; 268: 889 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeYoe EA, Carman GJ, Bandettini P, Glickman S, Wieser J, Cox R et al. Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 2382 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngel SA, Glover GH, Wandell BA. Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 1997; 7: 181 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCao Y, Towle VL, Levin DN, Balter JM. Functional mapping of human motor cortical activation with conventional MR imaging at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 869 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang J, Carr TH, Cao Y. Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 2001; 15: 39 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Wong EC, Hyde JS. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 161 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee AT, Glover GH, Meyer CH. Discrimination of large venous vessels in time-course spiral blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic-resonance functional neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 745 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcColl SL, Wilkinson F. Visual contrast gain control in migraine: measures of visual cortical excitability and inhibition. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 74 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchoenen J, Ambrosini A, Sandor PS, Maertens de Noordhout A. Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 955 – 72.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1468-2982.2006.01067.x.pdf
Size:
114.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.