Show simple item record

How Bad Is Depression? Preference Score Estimates from Depressed Patients and the General Population

dc.contributor.authorPyne, Jeffrey M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFortney, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Shanti P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFeeny, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorUbel, Peter A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, Johnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:58:17Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2009-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationPyne, Jeffrey M.; Fortney, John C.; Tripathi, Shanti; Feeny, David; Ubel, Peter; Brazier, John (2009). "How Bad Is Depression? Preference Score Estimates from Depressed Patients and the General Population." Health Services Research 44(4): 1406-1423. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74065>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-9124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1475-6773en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74065
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19453391&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare depression health state preference scores across four groups: (1) general population, (2) previous history of depression but not currently depressed, (3) less severe current depression, and (4) more severe current depression. Data Sources . Primary data were collected from 95 general population, 163 primary care, and 83 specialty mental health subjects. Study Design . Stratified sampling frames were used to recruit general population and patient subjects. Subjects completed cross-sectional surveys. Key variables included rating scale and standard gamble scores assigned to depression health state descriptions developed from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and SF-12. Data Collection/Extraction Methods . Each subject completed an in-person interview. Forty-nine subjects completed test/retest reliability interviews. Principal Findings . Depressed patient preference scores for three of six SF-12 depression health states were significantly lower than the general population using the rating scale and two of six were significantly lower using standard gamble. Depressed patient scores for five of six PHQ-9 depression health states were significantly lower than the general population using the rating scale and two of six were significantly lower using standard gamble. Conclusions . Depressed patients report lower preference scores for depression health states than the general population. In effect, they perceived depression to be worse than the general public perceived it to be. Additional research is needed to examine the implications for cost-effectiveness ratios using general population preference scores versus depressed patient preference scores.en_US
dc.format.extent120994 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 Health Research and Education Trusten_US
dc.subject.otherDepressionen_US
dc.subject.otherRating Scaleen_US
dc.subject.otherStandard Gambleen_US
dc.subject.otherCost–Utilityen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth-related Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.titleHow Bad Is Depression? Preference Score Estimates from Depressed Patients and the General Populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor VAMC and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI ,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research (152/NLR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR 72114 ,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research (152/NLR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR ,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPsychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR ,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Health Research, Northwest/Hawai'i/Southeast, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region, Portland, OR ,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19453391en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74065/1/j.1475-6773.2009.00974.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00974.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdang, E. M., G. Kootstra, G. L. Engel, J. P. van Hooff, and H. L. Merckelbach. 1998. “ Do Retrospective and Prospective Quality of Life Assessments Differ for Pancreas–Kidney Transplant Recipients? ” Transplant International 11 ( 1 ): 11 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlloy, L. B., and L. Y. Abramson. 1979. “ Judgment of Contingency in Depressed and Nondepressed Students: Sadder but Wiser? ” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108 ( 4 ): 441 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBadia, X., A. Diaz-Prieto, M. Rue, and D. L. Patrick. 1996. “ Measuring Health and Health State Preferences among Critically Ill Patients.” Intensive Care Medicine 22 ( 12 ): 1379 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalaban, D. J., P. C. Sagi, N. I. Goldfarb, and S. Nettler. 1986. “ Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument among Rheumatic Arthritics.” Medical Care 24 ( 11 ): 973 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarney, L. J., K. M. Griffiths, A. F. Jorm, and H. Christensen. 2006. “ Stigma about Depression and Its Impact on Help-Seeking Intentions.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40 ( 1 ): 51 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeck, M., S. Dietrich, H. Matschinger, and M. C. Angermeyer. 2003. “ Alcoholism: Low Standing with the Public? Attitudes towards Spending Financial Resources on Medical Care and Research on Alcoholism.” Alcohol and Alcoholism 38 ( 6 ): 602 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd, N., H. Sutherland, K. Heasman, D. L. Tritchler, and B. J. Cummings. 1990. “ Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis? ” Medical Decision Making 10 ( 1 ): 58 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrauer, C. A., A. B. Rosen, D. Greenberg, and P. J. Neumann. 2006. “ Trends in the Measurement of Health Utilities in Published Cost–Utility Analyses.” Value in Health 9 ( 4 ): 213 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrazier, J., R. Akehurst, A. Brennan, P. Dolan, K. Claxton, C. McCabe, M. Sculpher, and A. Tsuchyia. 2005. “ Should Patients Have a Greater Role in Valuing Health States? ” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4 ( 4 ): 201 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrazier, J., M. Deverill, C. Green, R. Harper, and A. Booth. 1999. “ A Review of the Use of Health Status Measures in Economic Evaluation.” Health Technology Assessment 3 ( 9 ): i – iv, 1–164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrazier, J., J. Roberts, and M. Deverill. 2002. “ The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health from The SF-36.” Journal of Health Economics 21 ( 2 ): 271 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrazier, J., T. Usherwood, R. Harper, and K. Thomas. 1998. “ Deriving a Preference-Based Single Index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 ( 11 ): 1115 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Wit, G. A., J. J. Busschbach, and F. T. De Charro. 2000. “ Sensitivity and Perspective in the Valuation of Health Status: Whose Values Count? ” Health Economics 9 ( 2 ): 109 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDolders, M. G., M. P. Zeegers, W. Groot, and A. Ament. 2006. “ A Meta-Analysis Demonstrates No Significant Differences between Patient and Population Preferences.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 ( 7 ): 653 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrummond, M. F., B. O'Brien, G. L. Stoddart, and G. W. Torrance. 1997. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleiss, J. L. 1986. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroberg, D. G., and R. L. Kane. 1989a. “ Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences—II: Scaling Methods.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42 ( 5 ): 459 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroberg, D. G., and R. L. Kane. 1989b. “ Methodology for Measuring Health-State Preferences III: Population and Context Effects.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42 ( 6 ): 585 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurlong, W., D. Feeny, G. W. Torrance, R. Barr, and J. Horsman. 1990. Guide to Design and Development of Health-State Utility Instrumentation. Hamilton, ON, Canada: McMaster University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGabriel, S. E., T. S. Kneeland, L. J. Melton III, M. M. Moncur, B. Ettinger, and A. N. Tosteson. 1999. “ Health-Related Quality of Life in Economic Evaluations for Osteoporosis: Whose Values Should We Use? ” Medical Decision Making 19 ( 2 ): 141 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGold, M. R., J. E. Siegel, L. B. Russell, and M. C. Weinstein. 1996. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, C., J. Brazier, and M. Deverill. 2000. “ Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life. A Review of Health State Valuation Techniques.” PharmacoEconomics 17 ( 2 ): 151 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInsinga, R. P., and D. G. Fryback. 2003. “ Understanding Differences between Self-Ratings and Population Ratings for Health in the EuroQOL.” Quality of Life Research 12 ( 6 ): 611 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan, R. M. 2005. “ The Minimally Clinically Important Difference in Generic Utility-Based Measures.” Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2 ( 1 ): 91 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaton, W. J., M. Schoenbaum, M. Y. Fan, C. M. Callahan, J. Williams Jr., E. Hunkeler, L. Harpole, X. H. Zhou, C. Langston, and J. Unutzer. 2005. “ Cost-Effectiveness of Improving Primary Care Treatment of Late-Life Depression.” Archives of General Psychiatry 62 ( 12 ): 1313 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKroenke, K., R. L. Spitzer, and J. B. Williams. 2001. “ The PHQ-9 Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 16 ( 9 ): 606 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazarus, R. S., and S. Folkman. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenert, L. A., J. R. Treadwell, and C. E. Schwartz. 1999. “ Associations between Health Status and Utilities Implications for Policy.” Medical Care 37 ( 5 ): 479 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLink, B. G., J. C. Phelan, M. Bresnahan, A. Stueve, and B. A. Pescosolido. 1999. “ Public Conceptions of Mental Illness: Labels, Causes, Dangerousness, and Social Distance.” American Journal of Public Health 89 ( 9 ): 1328 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlewellyn-Thomas, H., H. J. Sutherland, R. Tibshirani, A. Ciampi, J. E. Till, and N. F. Boyd. 1984. “ Describing Health States: Methodologic Issues in Obtaining Values for Health States.” Medical Care 22: 543 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacran, S., and P. Kind. 2001. “  ‘Death’ and the Valuation of Health-Related Quality of Life.” Medical Care 39 ( 3 ): 217 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatheson, K., and H. Anisman. 2003. “ Systems of Coping Associated with Dysphoria, Anxiety and Depressive Illness: A Multivariate Profile Perspective.” Stress 6 ( 3 ): 223 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKie, J., and J. Richardson. 2003. “ The Rule of Rescue.” Social Science and Medicine 56 ( 12 ): 2407 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Clinical Excellence. 2004. “Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal” [accessed on January 2, 2008]. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/TAP_Methods.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerry, B. L., B. A. Pescosolido, J. K. Martin, J. D. McLeod, and P. S. Jensen. 2007. “ Comparison of Public Attributions, Attitudes, and Stigma in Regard to Depression among Children and Adults.” Psychiatric Services 58 ( 5 ): 632 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostulart, D., and E. M. M. Adang. 2000. “ Response Shift and Adaption in Chronically Ill Patients.” Medical Decision Making 20: 186 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePyne, J. M., S. Tripathi, D. K. Williams, and J. Fortney. 2007. “ Depression-Free Day to Utility-Weighted Score: Is It Valid? ” Medical Care 45 ( 4 ): 357 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRashidi, A. A., A. H. Anis, and C. A. Marra. 2006. “ Do Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Derived Standard Gamble (SG) Utilities Agree with Health Utilities Index Utilities? A Comparison of Patient and Community Preferences for Health Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4: 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRevicki, D. A., A. Shakespeare, and P. Kind. 1996. “ Preferences for Schizophrenia-Related Health States: A Comparison of Patients, Caregivers and Psychiatrists.” International Clinical Psychopharmacology 11 ( 2 ): 101 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSackett, D. L., and G. W. Torrance. 1978. “ The Utility of Different Health States as Perceived by the General Public.” Journal of Chronic Diseases 31: 697 – 704.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchoenbaum, M., J. Unutzer, C. Sherbourne, N. Duan, L. V. Rubenstein, J. Miranda, L. S. Meredith, M. F. Carney, and K. Wells. 2001. “ Cost-Effectiveness of Practice-Initiated Quality Improvement for Depression: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of the American Medical Association 286 ( 11 ): 1325 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchomerus, G., H. Matschinger, and M. C. Angermeyer. 2006. “ Preferences of the Public Regarding Cutbacks in Expenditure for Patient Care: Are There Indications of Discrimination against Those with Mental Disorders? ” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 41 ( 5 ): 369 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeligman, M. E. P. 1998. Learned Optimism: How to Change Your Mind and Your Life. New York: A.A. Knopf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherbourne, C. D., J. Unutzer, M. M. Schoenbaum, N. Duan, L. A. Lenert, R. Sturm, and K. B. Wells. 2001. “ Can Utility-Weighted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Estimates Capture Health Effects of Quality Improvement for Depression? ” Medical Care 39 ( 11 ): 1246 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon, G. E., W. J. Katon, M. VonKorff, J. Unutzer, E. H. Lin, E. A. Walker, T. Bush, C. Rutter, and E. Ludman. 2001. “ Cost-Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Program for Primary Care Patients with Persistent Depression.” American Journal of Psychiatry 158 ( 10 ): 1638 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, D. M., R. L. Sherriff, L. Damschroder, G. Loewenstein, and P. A. Ubel. 2006. “ Misremembering Colostomies? Former Patients Give Lower Utility Ratings Than Do Current Patients.” Health Psychology 25 ( 6 ): 688 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSugar, C. A., R. Sturm, T. T. Lee, C. D. Sherbourne, R. A. Loshen, K. B. Wells, and L. A. Lenert. 1998. “ Empirically Defined Health States for Depression from the SF-12.” Health Services Research 33 ( 4 ): 911 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsevat, J., N. V. Dawson, A. W. Wu, J. Lynn, J. R. Soukup, E. F. Cook, H. Vidaillet, and R. S. Phillips. 1998. “ Health Values of Hospitalized Patients 80 Years or Older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.” Journal of the American Medical Association 279 ( 5 ): 371 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUbel, P. A., G. Loewenstein, and C. Jepson. 2003. “ Whose Quality of Life? A Commentary Exploring Discrepancies between Health State Evaluations of Patients and the General Public.” Quality of Life Research 12 ( 6 ): 599 – 607.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUbel, P. A., G. Loewenstein, N. Schwarz, and D. Smith. 2005. “ Misimagining the Unimaginable: The Disability Paradox and Health Care Decision Making.” Health Psychology 24 ( 4, suppl. ): S57 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalters, S. J., and J. E. Brazier. 2003. “ What Is the Relationship between the Minimally Important Difference and Health State Utility Values? The Case of the SF-6D.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1: 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare, J. Jr., M. Kosinski, and S. D. Keller. 1996. “ A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity.” Medical Care 34 ( 3 ): 220 – 33.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.