Show simple item record

Fracture Resistance of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Dental Implant Abutments

dc.contributor.authorAdatia, Nimet D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBayne, Stephen C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Lyndon F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jeffery Y.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:08:56Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:08:56Z
dc.date.issued2009-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationAdatia, Nimet D.; Bayne, Stephen C.; Cooper, Lyndon F.; Thompson, Jeffery Y. (2009). "Fracture Resistance of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Dental Implant Abutments." Journal of Prosthodontics 18(1): 17-22. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74231>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-849Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74231
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19166544&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: An in vitro study was performed to assess the effect of different degrees of clinical reduction of zirconia abutments on the failure load of clinical assemblies. Materials and Methods: Zirconia abutments (Y-TZP Ceramic Abutment, Astra Tech) were prepared with 0, 0.5, or 1 mm of external axial reduction starting 1 mm above the height-of-contour. Abutments (n = 10) were attached to implant analogs (25 Ncm torque) embedded in a stainless steel cylinder using Field's metal. Fracture loads (N) were determined when assemblies were loaded at 60° off-axis until failure (Instron, CHS = 0.1 mm/min). Groups were statistically compared using ANOVA ( p < 0.05). Results: Fracture loads for all assemblies displayed large variations within groups. There were no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05) among different abutment groups with a mean fracture load of 429 N (±140) for the control group, 576 N (±120) for 0.5-mm margins, and 547 (±139) for 1.0-mm margins. All fractures occurred at the interface where the abutment was connected to the analog. Conclusion: In this in vitro study of simulated ultimate assembly strength, the preparation of zirconia abutments did not significantly impair the fracture resistance of simulated implant assemblies. All implant abutments fractured at rates higher than the maximum incisal forces (90–370 N) estimated to occur in the anterior region of the mouth.en_US
dc.format.extent209581 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.subject.otherImplant Abutmentsen_US
dc.subject.otherStatic Loadingen_US
dc.subject.otherAngled Loadingen_US
dc.subject.otherZirconiaen_US
dc.subject.otherAbutment Complicationen_US
dc.titleFracture Resistance of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Dental Implant Abutmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NCen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TXen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19166544en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74231/1/j.1532-849X.2008.00378.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00378.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, et al: In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 90: 325 - 331en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan PLB, Dunne JT: An esthetic comparison of metal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an all-ceramic crown and zirconia abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 215 - 218en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodbeck U: The ZiReal Post: a new ceramic implant abutment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 10 - 23en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, et al: An in vitro evaluation of ZiReal abutments with hexagonal connection: in original state and following abutment preparation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 108 - 114en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersson B, Taylor A, Lang B, et al: Alumina ceramic abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1–3 year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 432 - 438en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMustafa K, Oden A, Wenneberg A, et al: The influence of surface topography of ceramic abutments on the attachement and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 373 - 381en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, et al: Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005; 33: 9 - 18en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, et al: Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 304 - 313en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, et al: The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater J 1999; 15: 426 - 433en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, et al: Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 487 - 491en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang Y, Lawn B, Rekow ED, et al: Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 381 - 386en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButz F, Heydecke G, Okutan M, et al: Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 838 - 843en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaphangkorakit J, Osborn JW: The effect of pressure on maximum incisal bite force in man. Arch Oral Biol 1997; 42: 11 - 17en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaraldson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B: Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37: 195 - 206en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitsias, ME: Fatigue test analysis of two esthetic implant abutments. 2004; p1 - 92. MS Thesis, Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M: In Vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 75 - 78en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al: Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 604 - 610en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTripodakis AP, Strub JR, Kappert HF, et al: Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 265 - 272en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrub JR, Gerds T: Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 167 - 171en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlue DS, Griggs JA, Woody RD, et al: Effects of bur abrasive particle size and abutment composition on preparation of ceramic implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 247 - 254en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZarb GJA: Mechanical fatigue of two dental luting agents in simulated function. 1999. Masters Thesis, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.