View Item 

Show simple item record

Mortality After Kidney Transplantation: A Comparison Between the United States and Canada

dc.contributor.authorKim, S. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchaubel, Douglas E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFenton, Stanley S. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeichtman, Alan B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPort, Friedrich K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:29:36Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2006-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationKim, S.J.; Schaubel, D.E.; Fenton, S.S.A.; Leichtman, A.B.; Port, F.K. (2006). "Mortality After Kidney Transplantation: A Comparison Between the United States and Canada." American Journal of Transplantation 6(1): 109-114. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74550>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74550
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16433764&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent100411 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Munksgaard 2005en_US
dc.subject.otherCanadaen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherPost-transplant Mortalityen_US
dc.subject.otherUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleMortality After Kidney Transplantation: A Comparison Between the United States and Canadaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16433764en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74550/1/j.1600-6143.2005.01141.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01141.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHariharan S, Johnson CP, Bresnahan BA, Taranto SE, McIntosh MJ, Stablein D. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 605 – 612.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Port FK, Arndorfer JA, Cibrik DM, Kaplan B. Survival improvement among patients with end-stage renal disease: trends over time for transplant recipients and wait-listed patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 1293 – 1296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3.  U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascual M, Theruvath T, Kawai T, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Cosimi AB. Strategies to improve long-term outcomes after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 580 – 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5.  2003 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1993–2002. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeld PJ, Brunner F, Odaka M, Garcia JR, Port FK, Gaylin DS. Five-year survival for end-stage renal disease patients in the United States, Europe, and Japan, 1982 to 1987. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 15: 451 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcelli D, Stannard D, Conte F, Held PJ, Locatelli F, Port FK. ESRD patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions in Lombardy (Italy) versus the United States. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 1013 – 1018.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodkin DA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Koenig KG et al. Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 3270 – 3277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference9.  Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Annual Report 2001. Vol 1: Dialysis and Renal Transplantation. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChurchill DN, Thorpe KE, Vonesh EF, Keshaviah PR. Lower probability of patient survival with continuous peritoneal dialysis in the United States compared with Canada. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 965 – 971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCattran DC, Fenton SS. Contemporary management of renal failure: outcome of the failed allograft recipient. Kidney Int 1993; 41 ( Suppl. ): S36 – S39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan B, Meier-Kriesche HU. Death after graft loss: an important late study endpoint in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 970 – 974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabbat CG, Thorpe KE, Russell JD, Churchill DN. Comparison of mortality risk for dialysis patients and cadaveric first renal transplant recipients in Ontario, Canada. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 917 – 922.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaul P, Armstrong PW, Chang WC et al. Long-term mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada: comparison of patients enrolled in Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO)-I. Circulation 2004; 110: 1754 – 1760.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorey KM, Holowaty J, Fehringer G et al. An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1156 – 1163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorey KM, Kliewer E, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Ng EY. An international comparison of breast cancer survival: Winnipeg, Manitoba and Des Moines, Iowa, metropolitan areas. Ann Epidemiol 2003; 13: 32 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD et al. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1500 – 1505.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2005.01141.x.pdf
Size:
98.05KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.