Show simple item record

METACLADISTICS

dc.contributor.authorKluge, Arnold G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:41:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:41:25Z
dc.date.issued1989-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationKluge, Arnold G. (1989). "METACLADISTICS." Cladistics 5(3): 291-294. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74736>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0748-3007en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-0031en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74736
dc.format.extent260637 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1989 The Willi Hennig Societyen_US
dc.titleMETACLADISTICSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Zoology and Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74736/1/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00491.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00491.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCladisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanser, B. H. 1950. A theory of systcmatics. Biblthca Biotheor. 4: 117 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4: 317 – 338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonoghue, M. J. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88: 172 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonoghue, M. J. 1982. Systematic studies in the genus Viburnum. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEstes, R., K. de Queiroz, and J. Gauthier. 1988. Phylogenctic relationships within the Squamata. In Estes, R. and G. Pregill ( eds ), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: essays commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 119 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEtheridge, R. and K. de Queiroz 1988. A phylogeny of Iguanidae. In Estes, R. and G. Pregill ( eds ), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: essays commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 283 – 367.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzinger, L. 1843. Systema reptilium. Braumuller and Seidel, Wien.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGauthier, J. 1984. A cladistic analysis of the higher systematic categories of the Diapsida. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley. 85–12825, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGauthier, J. 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin ofbirds. In Padian, K. ( ed. ), The origin of birds and the evolution of flight. Mem. Cal. Acad. Sci. 8: 1 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGauthier, J., R. Estes, and K. de Queiroz 1988. A phylogenctic analysis of Lepido-sauromorpha. In Estes, R. and G. Pregill ( eds ), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: essays commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 15 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, J. E. 1827. A synopsis of the genera of saurian reptiles, in which some new genera are indicated and others reviewed by actual examination. Annu. Philos. 2: 54 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHull, D. L. 1980. Individuality and selection. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 311 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHull, D. L. 1987. Genealogical actors in ecological roles. Biol. Philos. 2: 168 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKluge, A. G. 1988. The characterization of ontogeny. In Humphries, C.J. ( ed. ), Ontogeny and systematics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 57 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKluge, A. G. 1989a. Progress in squamate classification. Herpetologica, 45: 372 – 383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKluge, A. G. 1989b. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool., 38: 7 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMishler, B. D. and R. N. Brandon. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenctic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2: 397 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwenk, K. 1988. Comparative morphology of the lepidosaur tongue and its relevance to squamate phylogeny. In Estes, R. and G. Pregill ( eds ), Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: essays commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 569 – 598.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley, New York.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.