View Item 

Show simple item record

What Do Statistics Really Tell Us About the Quality of the Data from Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose?

dc.contributor.authorDedrick, Robert F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, W. K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:57:50Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:57:50Z
dc.date.issued1989-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationDedrick, R. F.; Davis, W. K. (1989). "What Do Statistics Really Tell Us About the Quality of the Data from Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose?." Diabetic Medicine 6(3): 267-273. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74995>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-5491en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74995
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2523790&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent1106847 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1989 Diabetes UKen_US
dc.subject.otherSelf-monitoringen_US
dc.subject.otherBlood Glucoseen_US
dc.subject.otherDiabetesen_US
dc.subject.otherMeasurement Erroren_US
dc.subject.otherStatistical Analysisen_US
dc.titleWhat Do Statistics Really Tell Us About the Quality of the Data from Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, University ol Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid2523790en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74995/1/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01159.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01159.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceDiabetic Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1 Consensus Development Panel. Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 95 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAverhahn C., Bergman M., Kumar SR, Morgan J. Reagent strip performance as evaluated by a meter. The Diabetes Educator 1985; 11: 41 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzis S., Hsiang Y. Comparative study of home blood glucose monitoring devices: Visidex, Chemstrip bG, Glucometer, and Accu-Chek bG. Diabetes Care 1983; 6: 529 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirch K., Hildebrandt P., Marshall MO, Sestoft L. Self-monitoring of blood glucose without a meter. Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 414 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanfield ME, Kemp SF, Hoff C. New blood glucose strip: Comparison of Visidex, Visidex II, and Chemstrip bG with glucose analyzer determination of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 77 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarson C., Daneman D., Frank M., Link J., Perlman K., Ehrlich RM. How accurate are children with diabetes at reading chemstrip bG? Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 354 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClements RS, Keane NA, Kirk KA, Boshell BR. Comparison of various methods for rapid glucose estimation. Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 392 – 395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGifford-Jorgensen RA, Borchert J., Hassanein R., Tilzer L., Eaks GA, Moore WV. Comparison of five glucose meters for self-monitoring of blood glucose by diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1986; 9: 70 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGodine JE, Hurxthal K., Nathan DM. Bedside capillary glucose measurement by staff nurses in a general hospital. Am J Med 1986; 80: 803 – 806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKubilis P., Rosenbloom AL, Lezotte D., et al. Comparison of blood glucose testing using reagent strips with and without a meter (Chemstrips bG and Dextrostix/Dextrometer). Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 417 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaus VG, Dietz MA, Levy RP. Potential pitfalls in the use of glucoscan and glucoscan II meters for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1984; 7: 590 – 594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarquette GP, Dillard T., Bietla S., Byl Nie JR. The accuracy of visual and meter determinations of blood glucose with the use of Chemstrip bG. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 883 – 884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMost RS, Gross AM, Davidson PC, Richardson, P. The accuracy of glucose monitoring by diabetic individuals in their home setting. The Diabetes Educator 1986; 12: 24 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson JD, Woelk MA, Sheps, S. Self glucose monitoring: A comparison of the Glucometer, Glucoscan, and Hypocount B. Diabetes Care 1983; 6: 262 – 267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchade DS, Eaton RP, Mitchell WJ, Friedman, NM. Intravenous home blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 420 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiffrin A., Desrosiers M., Belmonte M. Evaluation of two methods of self blood glucose monitoring by trained insulin-dependent diabetic adolescents outside the hospital. Diabetes Care 1983; 6: 166 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWing RR, Epstein LH, Nowalk MP, Scott N., Koeske, R. Compliance to self-monitoring of blood glucose: A marked-item technique compared with self-report. Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 456 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestgard JO, Hunt, MR. Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method-comparison studies. Clin Chem 1973; 19: 49 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox D., Clarke W., Gonder-Frederick L., et al. Accuracy of perceiving blood glucose in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 529 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePohl S., Gonder-Frederick L., Cox D., Evans W. Self-measurement of blood glucose concentration: clinical significance of patient-generated measurements. Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 617 – 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke WL, Cox D., Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W., Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 622 – 628.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin Chem 1974; 20: 825 – 833.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson WS. The statistical measurement of agreement. Am Sociol Rev 1957; 22: 17 – 25.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1464-5491.1989.tb01159.x.pdf
Size:
1.055MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.