View Item 

Show simple item record

Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003

dc.contributor.authorDanovitch, Gabriel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCohen, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeir, Matthew R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStock, Peter G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBennett, William M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Laura L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSung, Randall S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:07:49Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2005-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationDanovitch, Gabriel M.; Cohen, David J.; Weir, Matthew R.; Stock, Peter G.; Bennett, William M.; Christensen, Laura L.; Sung, Randall S. (2005). "Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003." American Journal of Transplantation 5(4p2): 904-915. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75152>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75152
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15760417&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent141971 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Munksgaard 2005en_US
dc.subject.otherDeceased Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherGraft Survivalen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney-pancreas Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Donationen_US
dc.subject.otherPancreas Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Survivalen_US
dc.subject.otherSRTRen_US
dc.subject.otherWaiting Listen_US
dc.titleCurrent status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherColumbia University, New York, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNorthwest Renal Clinic, Portland, ORen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15760417en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75152/1/j.1600-6135.2005.00835.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00835.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson DM, Dykstra DM, Levine GM, Li S, Welch JC, Webb RL. Transplant data: sources, collection, and research considerations, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 850 – 861.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Murray S et al. Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 950 – 957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXue JL, Ma J, Lois T, Collins A. Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage-renal-disease in the United Sates in the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2753 – 2761.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaston RS, Alvarenga DY, Becker B et al. Kidney and pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( Suppl. 4 ): 64 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5.  U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMagee JC, Bucuvalas JC, Farmer DG, Harmon WE, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Mendeloff EN. Pediatric transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 9 ): 54 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeier-Kriesche H-U, Port FK, Ojo AO et al. Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 1311 – 1317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMetzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( Suppl. 4 ): 114 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanovitch GM, Cecka JM. Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: past present, and future. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 882 – 890.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuidinger MK, Sung RS, Lake CD et al. Initial experience with the expanded criteria donor kidney allocation system: impact on utilization (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung RS, Guidinger MK, Leichtman AB et al. Initial experience with the expanded criteria donor kidney allocation system: impact on listed candidates (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDistant DA, Ashby VB, Port FK, Leichtman AB, Wolfe RA, Merion RM. ECD mortality: OPO waiting time by race and age (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenstrom JM, McBride MA, Rother KI, Hirshberg B, Orchard TJ, Harlan DM. Survival after pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes and preserved kidney function. JAMA 2003; 290: 2817 – 2823.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReddy KS, Stablein D, Taranto S et al. Long-term survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation versus kidney transplantation alone in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 464 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGruessner RW, Sutherland DE, Gruessner AC. Increased patient survival after solitary pancreas transplants (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 582 – 583.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWynn JJ, Distant DA, Pirsch J et al. Kidney and pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 9 ); 72 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JP, Wolfe RA, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups. N Engl J Med 2004; 35: 545 – 551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort FK, Ashby VB, Leichtman AB et al. Eliminating points for HLA-B similarity increased kidney allocation to minority, pediatric, sensitized, and zero MM candidates (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 414 – 415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCecka M, Gjertson D, Danovitch GM, Edward E. Most zero HLA-mismatched kidney transplant occur soon after listing leaving a waiting list of patients with increasingly uncommon HLA phenotypes (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 322.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanovitch GM, Smits J, Cohen B. Waiting-time or wasted time? The case for using time on dialysis to determine waiting time in the allocation of cadaveric kidneys. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 891 – 893.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanovitch GM, Rush SH, Gillespie B et al. Use of dialysis time to determine waiting time in the deceased-donor kidney allocation algorithm may improve access to transplantation for disadvantaged patient groups (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 431a.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6135.2005.00835.x.pdf
Size:
138.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.