View Item 

Show simple item record

Determinants of Breast Conservation Rates: Reasons for Mastectomy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

dc.contributor.authorLee, Marie Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Kendraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kent A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDiehl, Kathleen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBreslin, Tara M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCimmino, Vincent M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Alfred E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Lisa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSabel, Michael S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:20:08Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:20:08Z
dc.date.issued2009-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, M. Catherine; Rogers, Kendra; Griffith, Kent; Diehl, Kathleen A.; Breslin, Tara M.; Cimmino, Vincent M.; Chang, Alfred E.; Newman, Lisa A.; Sabel, Michael S. (2009). "Determinants of Breast Conservation Rates: Reasons for Mastectomy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center." The Breast Journal 15(1): 34-40. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75345>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1075-122Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4741en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75345
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19141132&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent290133 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Conservation Ratesen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality Measureen_US
dc.titleDeterminants of Breast Conservation Rates: Reasons for Mastectomy at a Comprehensive Cancer Centeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19141132en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75345/1/j.1524-4741.2008.00668.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00668.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Breast Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1. NIH consensus statement: treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 1990; 265: 668 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. JCO 2005; 23: 5526 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 745 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Surgeon perspectives about local therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 104: 1854 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3001 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster RSJ, Farwell ME, Costanza MC, et al. Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2: 275 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Hawley ST. From policy to patients and back: surgical treatment decision making for patients with breast cancer. Health Aff 2007; 26: 761 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006; 107: 2346 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce LJ, Griffith KA, Hayman JA, et al. Conservative surgery and radiotherapy for stage I/II breast cancer using lung density correction: 10-year and 15-year results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 1317 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen-David MA, Sturtz DE, Griffith KA, et al. Long-term results of conservative surgery and radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ using lung density correction: the University of Michigan experience. Breast J 2007; 13: 392 – 400.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1097 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 86: 628 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazovich D, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I and II breast cancer. JAMA 1991; 266: 3433 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbain KS, Green SR, Lichter AS, et al. Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography and systemic risk on the use of breast-sparing treatment in women enroled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials. JCO 1996; 14: 3009 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, et al. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1102 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNattinger AB, Hoffman RG, Shapiro R, et al. The effect of legislative requirements on the use of breast-conserving surgery. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1035 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBallard-Barbash R, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, et al. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 716 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawley ST, Hofer TP, Janz NK, et al. Correlates of between-surgeon variation in breast cancer treatments. Med Care 2006; 44: 609 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in health care delivery: implications for academic medical centers. BMJ 2002; 325: 961 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, et al. Patient-physician concordance: preference, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. JCO 2004; 22: 3091 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNold RJ, Beamer RL, Helmer SD, McBoyle MF. Factors influencing a woman’s choice to undergo breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy. Am J Sur 2000; 180: 413 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006; 106: 1462 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandelblatt JS, Hadley J, Kerner JF, et al. Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: patient preference and clinical and physician influences. Cancer 2000; 89: 561 – 73.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1524-4741.2008.00668.x.pdf
Size:
283.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.