Show simple item record

Analysis of the Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Disease in a Workplace Population over Time

dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Alyssa Belaireen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdington, Dee W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:22:51Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:22:51Z
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchultz, Alyssa B.; Edington, Dee W. (2010). "Analysis of the Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Disease in a Workplace Population over Time." Value in Health 13(2): 258-264. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75375>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-3015en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4733en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75375
dc.description.abstractObjectives:  While research has confirmed an association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and diseases such as heart disease and diabetes, none of these studies have been conducted in a worksite population. Because corporations are often the primary payer of health-care costs in the United States, they have a vested interest in identifying the magnitude of MetS risk factors in employed populations, and also in knowing if those risk factors are associated with other health risks or medical conditions. Methods:  This study identified the prevalence of MetS risk factors and self-reported disease in employees (N = 3285) of a manufacturing corporation who participated in a health risk appraisal and biometric screening in both 2004 and 2006. Health-care costs, pharmacy costs, and short-term disability costs were compared for those with and without MetS and disease. Results:  The prevalence of MetS increased from 2004 to 2006 in this employed population. Those with MetS were significantly more likely to self-report arthritis, chronic pain, diabetes, heartburn, heart disease, and stroke. Employees with MetS in 2004 were also significantly more likely to report new cases of arthritis, chronic pain, diabetes, and heart disease in 2006. The costs of those with MetS and disease were 3.66 times greater than those without MetS and without disease. Conclusions:  MetS is associated with disease and increased costs in this working population. There is an opportunity for health promotion to prevent MetS risk factors from progressing to disease status which may improve vitality for employees, as well as limit the economic impact to the corporation.en_US
dc.format.extent144193 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherDiabetesen_US
dc.subject.otherDiseaseen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth-care Costen_US
dc.subject.otherHeart Diseaseen_US
dc.subject.otherMetabolic Syndromeen_US
dc.subject.otherWorkplaceen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Disease in a Workplace Population over Timeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19818063en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75375/1/j.1524-4733.2009.00651.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00651.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceValue in Healthen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 539 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2  National Institutes of Health. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Executive Summary. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 2001 ( NIH publ. No. 01-3670 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1066 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt KJ, Resendez RG, Williams K, et al. San Antonio Heart Study. National Cholesterol Education Program versus World Health Organization metabolic syndrome in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation 2004; 110: 1251 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 683 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLakka H-M, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA 2002; 288: 2709 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNeill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, et al. The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 385 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutch SM, et al. NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1210 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation 2004; 110: 1245 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson PWF, Kannel WB, Silbershatz H, et al. Clustering of metabolic factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 1999; 259: 1104 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrundy S, Hansen B, Smith S, et al. Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Circulation 2004; 109: 551 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinomiya JK, L'Italien G, Criqui MH, et al. Association of the metabolic syndrome with history of myocardial infarction and stroke in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circulation 2004; 109: 42 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern MP, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, et al. Does the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease? Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2676 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosta LA, Canani LH, Lisboa HRK, et al. Aggregation of features of the metabolic syndrome is associated with increased prevalence of chronic complications in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 252 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLakksonen DE, Lakka H-M, Niskanen LK, et al. Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156: 1070 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanson RL, Imperatore G, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Components of the “metabolic syndrome” and incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 3120 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoevinger BL, Muller D, Alonso C, Coe CL. Metabolic syndrome in women with chronic pain. Metabolism 2007; 56: 87 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalci K, Utku U. Carpal tunnel syndrome and metabolic syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 2007; 116: 113 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner RA, Albers JW, Franzblau A, Armstrong TJ. The relationship between body mass index and the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1994; 7: 632 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Armstrong TJ. Influence of body mass index and work activity on the prevalence of median mononeuropathy at the wrist. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 268 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForbes L. Asthma and atopy: endocrine or metabolic conditions? Thorax 2005; 60: 793 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrmann DA, Liljenquist DR, Kasza K, et al. Prevalence and predictors of the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 48 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEssah PA, Nestler JE. The metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 2006; 29: 270 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrundy S, Hansen B, Smith S, et al. Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Circulation 2004; 109: 551 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference26  Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer price index summary. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm [Accessed September 9, 2009].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark Y-W, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, et al. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. JAMA 2002; 163: 427 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord ES, Giles WH. A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using two proposed definitions. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 575 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes. Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2444 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1263 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenkat Narayan KM, Jack L Jr, Laine C. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 945 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldana S, Barlow M, Smith R, et al. A worksite diabetes prevention program: two-year impact on employee health. AAOHN J 2006; 54: 389 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner D, Allaire SH, Reisine ST. Work disability resulting from chronic health conditions. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47: 253 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilette PC. Presenteeism in nursing: a clear and present danger to productivity. J Nurs Adm 2005; 35: 300 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiddaugh DJ. Presenteeism: sick and tired at work. Medsurg Nurs 2006; 15: 103 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitehouse D. Workplace presenteeism: how behavioral professionals can make a difference. Behav Healthc Tomorrow 2005; 14: 32 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference38  The Wellness Councils of America. The cost of wellness. Available from: http://www.welcoa.org/freeresources/pdf/goetzel_interview_cost.pdf [Accessed September 9, 2009].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaccarino V, McClure C, Johnson D, et al. Depression, the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. Psychosom Med 2008; 70: 40 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaikkonen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. The relationship between psychological risk attributes and the metabolic syndrome in healthy women: antecedent or consequence? Metabolism 2002; 51: 1573 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen J, Muntner P, Hamm LL, et al. The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 167 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003; 289: 3095 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMichael AJ. Standardized mortality ratios and the “healthy worker effect”: scratching beneath the surface. J Occup Med 1976; 18: 165 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Moual N, Kauffmann F, Eisen EA, Kennedy SM. The healthy worker effect in asthma: work may cause asthma, but asthma may also influence work. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 4 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadon K, Goldberg M, Becklake M. Healthy worker effect in cohort studies on chronic bronchitis. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002; 28: 328 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartvigsen J, Bakketeig LS, Leboeuf-Yde C, et al. The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the “healthy worker” effect: population-based cross-sectional and 5-year prospective questionnaire study. Spine 2001; 26: 1788 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBourgeois FT, Porter SC, Valim C, et al. The value of patient self-report for disease surveillance. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 765 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson CF, Boyd CM, Carlson MC, et al. Agreement between self-report of disease diagnoses and medical record validation in disabled older women: factors that modify agreement. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 123 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DR, Rogers WH, Kazis LE, et al. Patients' self-report of diseases in the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey based on comparisons with linked survey and medical data from the Veterans Health Administration. J Ambul Care Manage 2008; 31: 161 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorser W, Sikorskii A, Olomu A, et al. Concordance between comorbidity data from patient self-report interviews and medical record documentation. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 85 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWen CP, Tsai SP, Gibson RL. Anatomy of the healthy worker effect: a critical review. J Occup Med 1983; 25: 283 – 9.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.